• Welcome to #1 Roulette Forum & Message Board | www.RouletteForum.cc.

News:

Test the accuracy of your method to predict the winning number. If it works, then your system works. But tests over a few hundred spins tell you nothing.

Main Menu
Popular pages:

Roulette System

The Roulette Systems That Really Work

Roulette Computers

Hidden Electronics That Predict Spins

Roulette Strategy

Why Roulette Betting Strategies Lose

Roulette System

The Honest Live Online Roulette Casinos

Repeaters SectorBET

Started by ignatus, Nov 02, 05:20 AM 2018

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

ignatus

Alright, the show must go on!  :P Tried a new bet this morning;

-Look for any repeater from the last 10, IF found, BET that single repeater (with a sector of 5); That number and it's 2 Neighbours. Progressionline 1,1,1,1,1,1,1,2,2,2 STOP... (I tried Flatbet and longer progressions, that didn't work so this 10-numbers prog seemed to be the best) IF another repeater is found within the last 10, also STOP/Remove bets and Begin anew/Repeat procedure and bet that new repeater with a sector of 5...IF Hit, also remove all bets, and wait for a new repeater from the last 10...and so on.

Seems to work pretty good? Again, it's not a long-term winner, it will not always win etc.....

Did 5 tests (Live-spins) 3 First 1u bets, last 2, 5u bets.


RX-code

system "Repeaters-SectorBet"
// © ignatus 2018 ©

method "main"
begin
  while starting a new session
  begin
       Set List[5,5,5,5,5,5,5,10,10,10] to Record "progression" Data
       Set List[1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16] to Record "Spin Counter" Data
  end

   while on each spin
  begin

  if any inside bet won each
  begin
  clear Record "repeater" layout
  clear Record "neighbors" layout
  put 1 on Record "progression" Data Index
  put 1 on Record "Spin Counter" Data Index
  set flag "Bet" False
  end
 
  if flag "Bet" true each
  begin
  Put 100% of Record "progression" Data to Record "Repeater" layout list
  end

  If total inside bets count = 0 each
  begin

  end

  copy last Number to Record "last1" layout

  IF Record "last1" layout is found within Record "last10" layout each
  begin
  set flag "Bet" True
  clear Record "last10" layout
  put 1 on Record "progression" Data Index
  copy Record "last1" layout to to Record "Repeater" layout

  Put 2 on Neighbor Count

   Copy Neighbors of Record "last1" Layout
   to Record "neighbors" Layout

  Put 100% of Record "progression" Data to Record "Repeater" layout list
  Put 100% of Record "progression" Data to Record "neighbors" layout list
  put 1 on Record "Spin Counter" Data Index
  end

  if any inside bet lost each
begin
  add 1 on Record "progression" Data Index
  Put 100% of Record "progression" Data to Record "Repeater" layout list
  Put 100% of Record "progression" Data to Record "neighbors" layout list
  add 1 on Record "Spin Counter" Data Index
end


if Record "Spin Counter" Data = 11 each time
begin
  set flag "Bet" False
  clear Record "Repeater" layout
  clear Record "neighbors" layout
  put 1 on Record "progression" Data Index
  put 1 on Record "Spin Counter" Data Index
end

if total bankroll >= 2000 each time
begin
stop session
end

if total bankroll <= -2000 each time
begin
stop session
end


  If Record "progression" Data Index >
  Record "progression" Data Count
    Begin
   clear Record "Repeater" layout
   clear Record "neighbors" layout
   Put 1 on Record "progression" Data Index
   put 1 on Record "Spin Counter" Data Index
   End

Track last Number for 10 spins to
Record "last10" layout


  end
END
[/font]
If you like to donate link::[url="//paypal.me/ignatus1"]//paypal.me/ignatus1[/url]

"Focus on predicting wheel sectors where the ball is expected to land" ~Steve

Maui13

I've been doing something similar....I think

I check the last 4 numbers hit... and I bet as per the screenshot. Run it for only 20 spins, then start again.

Flat betting

Somehow pulls itself into profit everytime?!?!?!?!
Trust the timing of your life!

6th-sense

Reminds me of the sector bet I posted quite a while back

-