Simple System, Low bankroll, One bet selection.

[Herby]

Hi Nimo,
if you post the spin data I will work out and post results of the math shown in the link from luckyfella.
Tnx

P.S.: my rating button never worked, same problem like ignatus

[Nimo]

Turner you may as well put me on moderation as I was trolling for the naysayers to come and give their negativity.

Luckyfella is correct.  It doesn't matter what is posted, they will come in with a condescending tone and blatantly say it's wrong, it will lose etc etc. 

Luckyfella is also correct regarding TG's random has limits.  In every case I have played this method I know that I will be at so many units within so many spins like clockwork. 

Also having posted it, a friend of mine saw it and gave me a suggestion that I implemented increasing the win rate to 15% instead of 8%.  If I didn't post it, I wouldn't have seen what he saw and now we both earn more from it.  That is why the negativity should not be here at all.  Why should anyone post anything that could possibly be improved upon when it's it's shot down right from the start. 

Here is the chart from this morning's play, REAL MONEY RNG William Hill.  I'm using $10 units.  I wanted to make $1000 for this session.

[Shogun]

Turner you may as well put me on moderation as I was trolling for the naysayers to come and give their negativity.

Luckyfella is correct.  It doesn't matter what is posted, they will come in with a condescending tone and blatantly say it's wrong, it will lose etc etc. 

Luckyfella is also correct regarding TG's random has limits.  In every case I have played this method I know that I will be at so many units within so many spins like clockwork. 

Also having posted it, a friend of mine saw it and gave me a suggestion that I implemented increasing the win rate to 15% instead of 8%.  If I didn't post it, I wouldn't have seen what he saw and now we both earn more from it.  That is why the negativity should not be here at all.  Why should anyone post anything that could possibly be improved upon when it's it's shot down right from the start. 

Here is the chart from this morning's play, REAL MONEY RNG William Hill.  I'm using $10 units.  I wanted to make $1000 for this session.

Have to agree with everything Nimo has said here.
We all want to discuss roulette and systems. Isn't that what the forum is for. All the same negativity from one or two guys spoils this forum for everyone else. We all no the risks etc and don't need someone to explain in every new system post.
I like reading all the old posts most of them unfortunately spoilt by the same few people.
This puts people off posting.  Me for one.

Nimo, thanks for your post and system. I will definitely have a play with it when I have time. Please don't be put off from posting. I for one want to learn from you more experienced guys.

[thelaw]

REAL MONEY RNG William Hill.  I'm using $10 units.  I wanted to make $1000 for this session.

Keep posting these every day. That's the only way (or closest way) to prove that your method works .

If it fails, at least you had the courage of your convictions, which is more than most members here.

[ignatus]

Hi I coded this one now,

and yes? it's good, for short hit-n-run sessions (less than 1000 spins or so) ...but eventually it will get into a hole, it can't recover from... (as you can see in the chart?) ..i *think* the code should be correct, otherwise, let me know, so i can correct it?

Cheers 

RX Nimo-Dozens

Code Select Expand

system "Nimo Dozen System"
// © ignatus 2018 ©

method "main"
begin
  while starting a new session
  begin
      put 0 to Record "Highest Bankroll" Data

       Set List[1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,
       26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,34,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,
       51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61,62,63,64,65,66,67,68,69,70,71,72,73,74,75]
        to Record "progression" Data

       Set List[1,2,3,4,5,6,7]
        to Record "Spin count" Data

       Copy List[2nd dozen] Record "doz" Layout
  end

   while on each spin
  begin


  if any dozen bet won each
  begin
    if Bankroll >= Record "Highest Bankroll" Data
    begin
        clear Record "Highest Bankroll" Data
        put 100% Bankroll to Record "Highest Bankroll" Data
        put 1 on Record "progression" Data Index
        put 1 to Record "Spin count" Data Index
      end
    else
    begin
      put 1 to Record "Spin count" Data Index
    end
  end

  if Record "Spin count" Data index >= 5 each
  begin
  add 1 on Record "progression" Data Index
  put 1 on Record "Spin count" Data index
  end

   put 100% of Record "progression" data to Record "doz" Layout list
   add 1 on Record "Spin count" Data index

If Record "Spin count" Data Index >
  Record "Spin count" Data Count
    Begin
   clear Record "doz" Layout
   put 1 to Record "Spin count" Data Index
   Put 1 on Record "progression" Data Index

   put 100% of Record "progression" data to Record "doz" Layout
   End


  If Record "progression" Data Index >
  Record "progression" Data Count
    Begin
   clear Record "doz" Layout
   put 1 to Record "Spin count" Data Index
   Put 1 on Record "progression" Data Index

   put 100% of Record "progression" data to Record "doz" Layout list
   End


{if total bankroll >= 300 each time
begin
stop session
end
}

if total bankroll <= -2000 each time
begin
stop session
end


  end
END

[ignatus]

Maybe i underestimated this method? Now, tested again, the drop came at 20 000 spins...

so i made the progression longer (now 100 steps), and put the stoploss at -5000u, see how far it can go.. 


RX-code Nimo-dozens 2

Code Select Expand

system "Nimo Dozen System"
// © ignatus 2018 ©

method "main"
begin
  while starting a new session
  begin
      put 0 to Record "Highest Bankroll" Data

       Set List[1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,
       26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,34,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,
       51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61,62,63,64,65,66,67,68,69,70,71,72,73,74,75,
       76,77,78,79,80,81,82,83,84,85,86,87,88,89,90,91,92,93,94,95,96,97,98,99,100]
        to Record "progression" Data

       Set List[1,2,3,4,5,6,7]
        to Record "Spin count" Data

       Copy List[2nd dozen] Record "doz" Layout
  end

   while on each spin
  begin


  if any dozen bet won each
  begin
    if Bankroll >= Record "Highest Bankroll" Data
    begin
        clear Record "Highest Bankroll" Data
        put 100% Bankroll to Record "Highest Bankroll" Data
        put 1 on Record "progression" Data Index
        put 1 to Record "Spin count" Data Index
      end
    else
    begin
      put 1 to Record "Spin count" Data Index
    end
  end

  if Record "Spin count" Data index >= 5 each
  begin
  add 1 on Record "progression" Data Index
  put 1 on Record "Spin count" Data index
  end

   put 100% of Record "progression" data to Record "doz" Layout list
   add 1 on Record "Spin count" Data index

If Record "Spin count" Data Index >
  Record "Spin count" Data Count
    Begin
   clear Record "doz" Layout
   put 1 to Record "Spin count" Data Index
   Put 1 on Record "progression" Data Index

   put 100% of Record "progression" data to Record "doz" Layout
   End


  If Record "progression" Data Index >
  Record "progression" Data Count
    Begin
   clear Record "doz" Layout
   put 1 to Record "Spin count" Data Index
   Put 1 on Record "progression" Data Index

   put 100% of Record "progression" data to Record "doz" Layout list
   End


{if total bankroll >= 300 each time
begin
stop session
end
}

if total bankroll <= -5000 each time
begin
stop session
end


  end
END

[The General]

Luckyfella,

No answers?

[Turner]

Luckyfella,

No answers?

Give it a rest eh?
It may come as a great shock that he doesnt have to reply. You sound like a defense lawyer.
He has said in so many words that he isnt going to answer.

There is no one worse than you for ignoring questions you find uncomfortable.

[Turner]

We all want to discuss roulette and systems. Isn't that what the forum is for. All the same negativity from one or two guys spoils this forum for everyone else.

I agree to the point that it clearly isnt working. The "forumtard" and "gamblers fallacy" posts roll on, with no one taking on the "advice given"

Listen.....I also tend to agree with most of what Steve and Caleb say and in many ways it isnt negativity. Its just not having any effect so I really dont see the point of keep ramming it down peoples throats who clearly dont want to listen, like some roulette version of a door knocking Jehovahs witness

More often than not, they correct butI just think they are wasting their time and just winding people up

My 2 peneth

[The General]

Give it a rest eh?
It may come as a great shock that he doesnt have to reply. You sound like a defense lawyer.
He has said in so many words that he isnt going to answer.

There is no one worse than you for ignoring questions you find uncomfortable.

"Its easier to call it trolling instead of answering simple questions that lead to revealing blatant mistakes and misunderstanding." -Steve

[Turner]

"Its easier to call it trolling instead of answering simple questions that lead to revealing blatant mistakes and misunderstanding." -Steve

People dont have to answer, period....get over it - Turner

[The General]

Turner,

Trying contributing for a change instead trying to stir shit up.

[Turner]

Trying contributing for a change instead trying to stir shit up.

lol.....do you...Caleb, actually realise you just said that?

Thats made my night

[The General]

Sharing a little knowledge can save some newbies a lot of money. 

[Turner]

Sharing a little knowledge can save some newbies a lot of money.

newbies?, you mean forumtards?

You are talking to Uncle Turner now lol....give me a break!