• Welcome to #1 Roulette Forum & Message Board | www.RouletteForum.cc.

News:

The only way to beat roulette is by increasing accuracy of predictions (changing the odds). This is possible on many real wheels.

Main Menu
Popular pages:

Roulette System

The Roulette Systems That Really Work

Roulette Computers

Hidden Electronics That Predict Spins

Roulette Strategy

Why Roulette Betting Strategies Lose

Roulette System

The Honest Live Online Roulette Casinos

TG Min Interval TESTing

Started by ignatus, Jan 16, 03:09 AM 2019

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Steve

And how did you feel when you finally understood the systems failed because the accuracy was still random?

For me it was waking up. Every AP has been there.
"The only way to beat roulette is by increasing the accuracy of predictions"
Roulettephysics.com ← Professional roulette tips
Roulette-computers.com ← Hidden electronics that predicts the winning number
Roulettephysics.com/roulette-strategy ← Why most systems lose

Firefox

I was lucky enough that my engineering degree had considerable advanced maths and statistics elements plus  I'd read a lot of books on gaming theory,so I already knew they would lose.

I got dragged into casinos by bridge playing friends, but at that time I wasn't  doing VB or playing roulette systems. I was collecting data on wheels for possible biased wheel play. And I also experimented with blackjack counting.

I made a bit short term from slightly biased wheels but found out data collection was not worth the hours due to casinos regularly changing wheels and positions or retiring crap wheels.  In the end, wheel technology like solid cast rotors reduced the chance of a rotor overcoming house edge, so even if there was a 1% bias you're still playing a -1.7% wheel. Better off playing basic strategy BJ without any hassle of data collection.

Steve

You are educated and understand the logic. The ones who don't know better think you're the slow one.

Anyway it's good to have you here.

Regarding wheel bias, it isnt my first choice but it's still viable with team play, and confirming bias visually. Some wheels are in such bad condition it's only the ignorance of most players that keeps the wheel on the floor.
"The only way to beat roulette is by increasing the accuracy of predictions"
Roulettephysics.com ← Professional roulette tips
Roulette-computers.com ← Hidden electronics that predicts the winning number
Roulettephysics.com/roulette-strategy ← Why most systems lose

Taotie

3 word sum up..


..a stupid progression

Firefox

@Steve. Cheers, well I haven't been around the net on the Roulette advantage scene since the days of Laurence's forum 2004, due to work comittment, but a bit more time now though.

With regard to testing, I don't know if it is possible , but from a basic programme similation I would always print out at the end, the number of trials, the total amount bet, the theoretical loss, and the actual loss/win on the given simulation.

As you say, it's difficult to grasp the amount of no betting or small betting taking place without more explanation.

Let Me Win

Quote from: Steve on Jan 16, 09:32 PM 2019
Ignatus, good work on coding it. I'm running a test now on rx.

It was coded by st0rm0r over ten years ago!

The General

Quote from: Firefox on Jan 16, 11:33 PM 2019
I was lucky enough that my engineering degree had considerable advanced maths and statistics elements plus  I'd read a lot of books on gaming theory,so I already knew they would lose.

I got dragged into casinos by bridge playing friends, but at that time I wasn't  doing VB or playing roulette systems. I was collecting data on wheels for possible biased wheel play. And I also experimented with blackjack counting.

I made a bit short term from slightly biased wheels but found out data collection was not worth the hours due to casinos regularly changing wheels and positions or retiring crap wheels.  In the end, wheel technology like solid cast rotors reduced the chance of a rotor overcoming house edge, so even if there was a 1% bias you're still playing a -1.7% wheel. Better off playing basic strategy BJ without any hassle of data collection.

Firefox,

I currently own two wheels as well.  I have a Huxley Mark Series 7 Starburst  and a Huxley Mark 7 with traditional frets.
I'm both a professional biased wheel player and vb player.   I started in VB and then went into biased wheel play as a combo over the years.

  I learned to defect spot biased wheels on sight by taking the wheels apart and by researching the various wheel defects/assembly flaws from various wheel designs.  I see you own a wheel well, so I'd be interested in sharing  intel and defect photos on the wheels.  I also have archives of numerous biased wheels from all over the world if you'd like to surf data for simulations.

-The General 
Basic probability and The General are your friend.
(Now hiring minions, apply within.)

Madi

Quote from: The General on Jan 17, 01:17 PM 2019
Firefox,



  I learned to defect spot biased wheels on sight by taking the wheels apart and by researching the various wheel defects/assembly flaws from various wheel designs.  I see you own a wheel well, so I'd be interested in sharing  intel and defect photos on the wheels.

-The General

Uncle tom
You sounds more like a salvage wreker rather than a roulette guru.

Have you worked anytime in your life in wrekyards? Entire roulette community wants to know.

-