• Welcome to #1 Roulette Forum & Message Board | www.RouletteForum.cc.

News:

WARNING: Forums often contain bad advice & systems that aren't properly tested. Do NOT believe everything. Read these links: The Facts About What Works & Why | How To Proplerly Test Systems | The Top 5 Proven Systems | Best Honest Online Casinos

Main Menu
Popular pages:

Roulette System

The Roulette Systems That Really Work

Roulette Computers

Hidden Electronics That Predict Spins

Roulette Strategy

Why Roulette Betting Strategies Lose

Roulette System

The Honest Live Online Roulette Casinos

Beating the even money

Started by Winner, Jan 23, 10:45 AM 2019

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Let Me Win


atlantis

Quote from: loukoumas on Mar 23, 04:59 AM 2019
Regarding Gr8 players prog:
LEVEL 1:  âˆ'1, 1, 1,âˆ'1, âˆ'1,âˆ'1.âˆ'1        âˆ'3 up next LEVEL
LEVEL 2:  2, âˆ'2, âˆ'2, âˆ'2, 2, 2, âˆ'2       âˆ'2 up next LEVEL
LEVEL 3:  3, âˆ'3. âˆ'3, 3.âˆ'3,âˆ'3,âˆ'3       âˆ'9  up next LEVEL what we do here? Go back to LEVEL 2 or continue?
LEVEL 4:  4, 4. 4 what we do here? Go back 2  LEVELS (start from  LEVEL2)? Or 1 back, start from LEVEL 3?


Here is how I might play your results, Loukoumas, using that progression:

-1; 1  = +0 level so restart level 1
1        =+1 new high so restart level 1
-1; -1; -1; -1; 1; -1; -1  = -4  in minus so up to 2u
-2; 2; 2; -2; 2; -2; -2    = -6  still in minus so up to 3u
3; -3; -3; -3; 3; 3; 3     = -3  improved so back down to 2u for next 7 bets

In the book LetMeWin showed each Level can have 10 bets or stages...

A.
Thru the darkness of Future Past the magician longs to see. One chants out between two worlds:
"Fire -- Walk with me!"

boyd30

As GLC showed best with not so high stake I continued the test. It is played the most dominant last 7. Must be thousands of numbers that Mr Eko provided. Well, a bit on the way at least.

ice789

Quote from: boyd30 on Mar 23, 10:07 AM 2019
As GLC showed best with not so high stake I continued the test. It is played the most dominant last 7. Must be thousands of numbers that Mr Eko provided. Well, a bit on the way at least.

pls share code drsgon ts2

boyd30

Quote from: ice789 on Mar 23, 10:27 AM 2019
pls share code drsgon ts2

I can't code. I'm doing it by hand.

loukoumas

-1; 1  = +0 level so restart level 1
1        =+1 new high so restart level 1
-1; -1; -1; -1; 1; -1; -1  = -4  in minus so up to 2u
Correct, but according GLC we havent to think for a level within a level, so we just track for at least -1 1st level  total to move up to next level.
-2; 2; 2; -2; 2; -2; -2 ?   
3; -3; -3; -3; 3; 3; 3.?   Those are different from my example.
Anyway i write what i think should be right according this old post:
LEVEL 1:  âˆ'1, 1, 1,âˆ'1, âˆ'1,âˆ'1.âˆ'1        âˆ'3 up next LEVEL
LEVEL 2:  2, âˆ'2, âˆ'2, âˆ'2, 2, 2, âˆ'2       âˆ'2 up next LEVEL
LEVEL 3:  3 (return to level 2 since we are +1plus, GLC is clear at this point,  meaning that in any stage of a level we are +1plus we have to go back to previous level)
LEVEL 2:âˆ'2,âˆ'2, 2,âˆ'2,âˆ'2,âˆ'2, 2 (instead of 4 from my example) âˆ'6 up next LEVEL
LEVEL 3: +3,+3 (if  next +3 again we have to go back at LEVEL 1 though, we always seek to return at "ville"1).
Note that is different approach  from cyclic 5 progression
11111
22222
33333
44444
55555
where always have to complete all 5 stages of a level.

atlantis

Quote
Regarding Gr8 players prog:
LEVEL 1:  âˆ'1, 1, 1,âˆ'1, âˆ'1,âˆ'1.âˆ'1        âˆ'3 up next LEVEL
LEVEL 2:  2, âˆ'2, âˆ'2, âˆ'2, 2, 2, âˆ'2       âˆ'2 up next LEVEL
LEVEL 3:  3, âˆ'3. âˆ'3, 3.âˆ'3,âˆ'3,âˆ'3       âˆ'9  up next LEVEL what we do here? Go back to LEVEL 2 or continue?
LEVEL 4:  4, 4. 4 what we do here? Go back 2  LEVELS (start from  LEVEL2)? Or 1 back, start from LEVEL 3?

At the end of Level 2 you have got -2 - but it should be -5
At the end of Level 3 you would be -14 overall

A.
Thru the darkness of Future Past the magician longs to see. One chants out between two worlds:
"Fire -- Walk with me!"

-Katalyst-

Quote from: boyd30 on Mar 23, 10:07 AM 2019
Must be thousands of numbers that Mr Eko provided. Well, a bit on the way at least.


**14605 sets
- so prbly around 28500 numbers (0s inclusive)

@ Jono - the dominant 3 mechanically doesn’t hold up, having said that - there’s still money to be made with this set up - I guess that’s where intuit & experience also comes into play

-Best-
-there is no off switch for the genius button -

“envy is ignorance, imitation is suicide”

loukoumas

  We say same thing Atlantis, I just make the addition separately for each level.You add the total sum. ;)

atlantis

Quote from: loukoumas on Mar 23, 11:06 AM 2019
  We say same thing Atlantis, I just make the addition separately for each level.You add the total sum. ;)

Yes you are right! :)
All I'm saying is that at the end of level 3 you are -14
If u check the way I do it using your wins and losses it is only -3 at the end of level 3!

Agree that main idea is to try and keep as long as possible in "1-ville".

Regards,
A.
Thru the darkness of Future Past the magician longs to see. One chants out between two worlds:
"Fire -- Walk with me!"

atlantis

Hi Loukoumas,

You w/l register  = LWWLLLLWLLLWWLWLLWLLLWWW

-1; 1  = +0 level so restart level 1
1        =+1 new high so restart level 1
-1; -1; -1; -1; 1; -1; -1  = -4  in minus so up to 2u
-2; 2; 2; -2; 2; -2; -2    = -6  still in minus so up to 3u
3; -3; -3; -3; 3; 3; 3     = -3  improved so back down to 2u for next 7 bets

LW
W
LLLLWLL
LWWLWLL
WLLLWWW

A.
Thru the darkness of Future Past the magician longs to see. One chants out between two worlds:
"Fire -- Walk with me!"

loukoumas

Yes , right, just now your approach flashed into my mind! :thumbsup:
So you propose a slight modification to GLCs only for level1. IF we reach +1plus within 1st level we track the level back from the start and we do it until conscecutive loses  lead us to step up.Clever!

boyd30

Quote from: -Katalyst- on Mar 23, 11:03 AM 2019

**14605 sets
- so prbly around 28500 numbers (0s inclusive)

@ Jono - the dominant 3 mechanically doesn’t hold up, having said that - there’s still money to be made with this set up - I guess that’s where intuit & experience also comes into play

-Best-

28500 numbers! So if I count it right I have passed 500 spins ( as there is no need to type down every number on RX).

jono1167

Quote from: -Katalyst- on Mar 23, 11:03 AM 2019

**14605 sets
- so prbly around 28500 numbers (0s inclusive)

@ Jono - the dominant 3 mechanically doesn’t hold up, having said that - there’s still money to be made with this set up - I guess that’s where intuit & experience also comes into play

-Best-

All good Katalyst. I’m going to test some of the other methods but with different progressions.

Mister Eko

Quote from: jono1167 on Mar 23, 01:07 AM 2019
Toughest session yet..... see results below....

2,2,2 - 1,1,1  LLL  (+40) -7 fb
2,2,2 - 2  W  (+44) -6 fb
2,1,2 - 0,1,2  LLW  (+42) -7 fb
1,0,1 - 1  W  (+46) -6 fb
1,1,2 - 1  W  (+47) -5 fb
2,1,2 - 1,1,1  LLL  (+41) -8 fb
2,2,1 - 1,1,2  LLW  (+38) -8 fb
1,1,2 - 1   W  (+43) -7 fb
1,2,1 - 2,2,1  LLW   (+40) -8 fb 
1,2,2 - 1,1,1  LLL  (+22) -11 fb
1,1,1 - 2,2,1  LLW  (+15) -12 fb
2,2,2 - 1,2  LW  (+16) -13 fb
1,1,2 -,2,2,2  LLL. (-14) -16 fb
1,1,1 - 1    W (-2) -15 fb
0,1,2,2 - 2  W (+9) -14 fb
1,2,0,1 - 1  W (+19) -13 fb
2,1,1 - 2,1  LW (+20) -13 fb
2,1,1 - 2,1  LW (+21) -13 fb
1,1,0,0,1 - 1  W (+30) -12 fb
1,1,1 - 1  W  (+38) -11 fb
0,1,1,2 - 2,2,1  LLW (+32) -14 fb
1,1,1 - 2,2,1  LLW  (+25) -15 fb
2,2,2 - 2  W (34) -14 fb
1,1,2 - 2,1  LW (+26) -14 fb
2,2,1 - 1,1,2  LLW (+29) -15 fb
2,1,2 - 1,1,2  LLW (+21) -16 fb
1,1,2 - 1  W (+31) -15 fb
1,1,1 - 2,1  LW  (+30) -15 fb       
2,1,0,1 - 2,2,2  LLL  (+0) -18 fb
2,2,2 - 1,2  LW (+1) -18 fb
2,2,2 - 1,1,1  LLL. (-40) -21 fb
1,1,1 - 1  W. (-25) -20 fb
1,1,2 - 2,2,1  LLW  (-28) -21 fb
0,1,1,2 - 1  W  (-13) -20 fb
1,1,2 - 2,1  LW (-12) -20 fb
0,1,2,1 - 0,1  LW (-11) -20 fb
1,1,1 - 1  W (+3) -19 fb
1,1,1 - 2,2,1  LLW (-9) -20 fb
2,2,2 - 1,2  LW (-8) -20 fb
1,1,1 - 1  W  (+6) -19 fb
1,2,2 - 1,1,1  LLL. (-36) -22 fb
1,1,1 - 1  W (-20) -21 fb
1,1,2 - 1  W (-5) -20 fb
2,2,1 - 2  W (+9) -19 fb
1,2,1 - 1  W (+22) -18 fb
1,1,1 - 2,1  LW (+23) -18 fb
2,1,1 - 1  W (+35) -17 fb
2,2,2 - 2 W  (+46) -16 fb
2,1,1 - 2,2,2   LLL (+40) -19 fb
2,2,2 - 1,1,2  LLW (+37) -20 fb
1,2,2 - 1,2  LW  (+38) -20 fb
2,1,1 - 2,1  LW (+39) -20 fb
1,1,1 - 2,1  LW (+40) -20 fb
1,1,2 - 1  W (+45) -19 fb
1,1,2 - 0,1  LW (+46) -18 fb
1,2,2 - 2  W (+50) -17 fb
1,1,1 - 1   W  (+53) -16 fb
2,2,1 - 1 W (+55) -15 fb

Total profit: +55 units (This session +9)
Flat bet -15 (This session -11).

I won’t be able to salvage the flat-bet but that’s ok.... I plan to use a conservative progression.

No more testing the ‘Dominant 3’. I’m happy the system has proved itself against a tough set of numbers.

I’m now going to test some of the other systems against Mr Eko’s numbers.
😊

Jono, I said I have incredible hard numbers. 99% of systems will fail on this.

Anyway, I worked on my against, and same switching method. I not revealed yet now, because not was the best results, but I kept to work on this, amd I think I found a way that kept me to positive after thousands of numbers. Even this is very very small numbers, an maybe the next 2000 numbers will lose more.

I wanna go thorough all my numbers, whick killed the dominant 3 method too, killed the Atlantis best of five, and now killing GLC method too.

Please guys, downllad my numbers, and try to discover something against them !  ;) :thumbsup:

Cheers
Eko

-