• Welcome to #1 Roulette Forum & Message Board | www.RouletteForum.cc.

News:

Odds and payouts are different things. If either the odds or payouts don't change, then the result is the same - eventual loss.

Main Menu
Popular pages:

Roulette System

The Roulette Systems That Really Work

Roulette Computers

Hidden Electronics That Predict Spins

Roulette Strategy

Why Roulette Betting Strategies Lose

Roulette System

The Honest Live Online Roulette Casinos

Does random have limits?

Started by MoneyT101, Feb 11, 02:23 AM 2019

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Person S

As I understand it, non-random events are cycles. Cycles have different lengths. Length is related to statistics. Is this the right way?

Frodo

Quote from: MoneyT101 on Feb 21, 02:52 AM 2019

If you read the article in the topic link I recommended, you will understand more of how to win.  But first understand non random events

non random events
1 2 3 = NO BET

how does that improve your prediction?

if you would have 1 2 (bet on 1 and 2 hoping for a repeat) and shows 3, you are -2

sorry i don`t follow.

MoneyT101

Quote from: redhot on Feb 21, 12:17 PM 2019
In this example, we know the repeat will come at spin 12 (it has to, unless a zero comes)

But how is this useful? You would need to cover all 3 dozens.

Exactly did you catch what you just said.

“It has to”
Simple once you get it!  Chased all the pigeons away and they were already in their hole

MoneyT101

Quote from: Person S on Feb 21, 01:44 PM 2019
As I understand it, non-random events are cycles. Cycles have different lengths. Length is related to statistics. Is this the right way?

I think your getting a better understanding...

You should continue thinking some more and read my most recent post again.

Keep your thoughts private  :thumbsup:
Simple once you get it!  Chased all the pigeons away and they were already in their hole

MoneyT101

Quote from: Frodo on Feb 21, 01:57 PM 2019
non random events
1 2 3 = NO BET

how does that improve your prediction?

if you would have 1 2 (bet on 1 and 2 hoping for a repeat) and shows 3, you are -2

sorry i don`t follow.

Yes if that situation happens then it’s no bet!

Now take 36 numbers... 

How many times can you get to 36 and have no bet?

I think the maximum is 31 numbers without a repeat

For 1000 spins of dozens you have 20% that you will get this situation where all 3 show up

For 1000 spins of double streets you have 2% that all six will show up
Simple once you get it!  Chased all the pigeons away and they were already in their hole

MoneyT101

My last few post contain very important information to help you beat this game or any game based on random numbers.  I have said enough in a open forum.  I suggest everyone actually searching continue in private.  What I shared with what Priyanka shared to make things clear is enough.

Just think of why something should work and why, what you’re doing shouldn’t work.

Don’t use to many computer data to look.  Go over it slowly and think of what is happening
Simple once you get it!  Chased all the pigeons away and they were already in their hole

MoneyT101

Here are my final hints and it will help you not go around in circles like I did for so long might save you 1 or 2 years.  I’m done with this topic!  If you find the secret   :-X

-you CANT bet on all numbers until a repeat

-you CANT bet on all numbers that haven’t showed up until the repeat

-numbers win/numbers lose.... who cares?

Quote from Dyksexlic-

“The 'secret' is that ALL gambling systems produce winning spins (EVENTually),

Just as ALL gambling systems produce losing spins (EVENTually)”
Simple once you get it!  Chased all the pigeons away and they were already in their hole

Person S

MONEYT101, thanks for the valuable posts they inspire to move on!!!

MoneyT101

Quote from: MoneyT101 on Feb 21, 02:32 PM 2019
Yes if that situation happens then it’s no bet!

Now take 36 numbers... 

How many times can you get to 36 and have no bet?

I think the maximum is 31 numbers without a repeat

For 1000 spins of dozens you have 20% that you will get this situation where all 3 show up

For 1000 spins of double streets you have 2% that all six will show up

Sorry I said it wrong... 20% of the 1000 spins will have all 3 show up

2% of the 1000 spins for double street will have all 6 show up
Simple once you get it!  Chased all the pigeons away and they were already in their hole

MoneyT101

Quote from: Person S on Feb 21, 02:47 PM 2019
MONEYT101, thanks for the valuable posts they inspire to move on!!!

:thumbsup:
Simple once you get it!  Chased all the pigeons away and they were already in their hole

redhot

MoneyT101 - Using dozens as an example, would you be able to win against the following sequence?

1|2|3|0|1
2|3|1|2|0
3|1|2|3|0

Each line has a repeat within the 15 spins as you stated, does this session end at +1?

Person S

With the permission of Moneyt, Red, look at this topic not as a ready-made system, but as an idea that requires cutting. This is not true !!! This is an example of what is happening. Read messages thoughtfully !!! Slowly look through the topics that Money recommended, and be a little creative, and perhaps an understanding will arise in your head and a thought will flare up, as it was with me. Of course, I’m not completely sure if I understood everything that’s written here, it needs some work and a quality check. But while the results are fine with me, good luck!  Sorry for my english :question:

Person S

Here, if you have not noticed the answer to your question


non random events
1 2 3 = NO BET

how does that improve your prediction?

if you would have 1 2 (bet on 1 and 2 hoping for a repeat) and shows 3, you are -2

sorry i don`t follow.

Yes if that situation happens then it’s no bet!

redhot

No bet from spin 10 onwards is fine except for the fact that you would have already lost on spins 4-9 where you were betting. How then does this scenario end in +1?

This can be extended out to double streets, streets, splits etc... still the same situation can occur


poobear

This is not a method, he's just showing an example of a limit to randomness.

-