• Welcome to #1 Roulette Forum & Message Board | www.RouletteForum.cc.

News:

WARNING: Forums often contain bad advice & systems that aren't properly tested. Do NOT believe everything. Read these links: The Facts About What Works & Why | How To Proplerly Test Systems | The Top 5 Proven Systems | Best Honest Online Casinos

Main Menu
Popular pages:

Roulette System

The Roulette Systems That Really Work

Roulette Computers

Hidden Electronics That Predict Spins

Roulette Strategy

Why Roulette Betting Strategies Lose

Roulette System

The Honest Live Online Roulette Casinos

Explain the fallacy

Started by Anastasius, May 19, 06:13 AM 2019

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Anastasius

Yes indeed fix fox.  But my question i wanted help with is hypothetical.  It could even be a rng with 37 numbers but 1/12 must hit within 24 spins.

So like i said in this unique situation if u wait 12 then bet 12 with martingale u wud ensure win.

My actual question is the maths on the same situation but 1 number is bet .. so for example 23 spins  could even hit the other number and miss the 12 but then hit your or another of the 12 on the last spin. But it must hit

Thanks  for every1 help.
Boom boom sir

Firefox

Same answer. Waiting or making hypothetical bets makes no difference to the odds. The maths is the same.

You can wait for 20 reds in a row and the probability of red (or black) is still 18/37 on the next spin. So waiting or hypothetical bets are totally useless to get an advantage with a martingale ;)

Anastasius

Of course ur right but not in a hypothetical  question. Was only asking probability math
Boom boom sir

Firefox

I'm answering from the point of view of probability in a hypothetical situation.

-