• Welcome to #1 Roulette Forum & Message Board | www.RouletteForum.cc.

News:

WARNING: Forums often contain bad advice & systems that aren't properly tested. Do NOT believe everything. Read these links: The Facts About What Works & Why | How To Proplerly Test Systems | The Top 5 Proven Systems | Best Honest Online Casinos

Main Menu
Popular pages:

Roulette System

The Roulette Systems That Really Work

Roulette Computers

Hidden Electronics That Predict Spins

Roulette Strategy

Why Roulette Betting Strategies Lose

Roulette System

The Honest Live Online Roulette Casinos

Smart Progression

Started by Kali49, Nov 18, 11:09 AM 2019

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Was this post helpful?

Yes
3 (75%)
No
0 (0%)
Show us something Better
0 (0%)
I don't understand your explanations
1 (25%)

Total Members Voted: 4

Voting closed: Nov 25, 04:06 PM 2019

Person S

Well, I say intuitively, not knowing the answer that the game theory will give that method 2 should be better.
But according to probability theory, method 2 and method 3 are equal.

Person S

I also noticed that sometimes 3 lines are not enough to complete the game, for example
1 LLLWLL
2 LLW0WL
3 LL000W
probably it makes sense to add more lines ...

You can also get under the LLLLLLL strip in one of the columns.
1 LLWLL
2 LL0WW
3 LL000
4 L
5 L ..... etc

quos

Quote from: Person S on Nov 21, 10:35 AM 2019
I also noticed that sometimes 3 lines are not enough to complete the game, for example
1 LLLWLL
2 LLW0WL
3 LL000W
probably it makes sense to add more lines ...

Hi Person, in your example, at least you should have played another 6 more spins. According to Kali, it must be close to equilibrium before moving on to line 2.
40% -60%. if you bet on red, before moving on to line 2, the number of reds must be close to at least 40%. Although I think Kali said his system wins with 30%. in your example you only have 16,6%

Regards!!

Person S

Quote from: quos on Nov 21, 10:43 AM 2019
Hi Person, in your example, at least you should have played another 6 more spins. According to Kali, it must be close to equilibrium before moving on to line 2.
40% -60%. if you bet on red, before moving on to line 2, the number of reds must be close to at least 40%. Although I think Kali said his system wins with 30%. in your example you only have 16,6%

Regards!!

Hi, but as we understand it, it will not always be so perfect, on the screen is an example of how much red and black can hit.

Roulettebeater

Quote from: GLC on Nov 18, 09:52 PM 2019
At one time members thought I was the progression master. 
I did have fun with them.
I have posted at least 30 different progressions.  And there were many others that I never posted because they all ended up at the same place.
I realized that there's always a sequence that can ruin you.  Maybe you won't ever see it in your lifetime or maybe it will show up the very next time you sit down to play.
I'm not trying to discourage you, I'm just suggesting that you do a lot of testing on this progression before you decide to swim out too far from shore.

It seems u have lost ur faith in progressive systems !

Btw, you look like George Clooney !!!  :twisted: :twisted:
A dollar won is twice as sweet as as a dollar earned

Roulettebeater

Quote from: quos on Nov 21, 10:43 AM 2019
Hi Person, in your example, at least you should have played another 6 more spins. According to Kali, it must be close to equilibrium before moving on to line 2.
40% -60%. if you bet on red, before moving on to line 2, the number of reds must be close to at least 40%. Although I think Kali said his system wins with 30%. in your example you only have 16,6%

Regards!!

Can you prove that this system wins with 30% ?

Give us facts, show us numbers ?!?
A dollar won is twice as sweet as as a dollar earned

Person S

yes it may be FTL will show a plus, but I saw R / B bands lasting 20-22 times. If we bet all the time for the previous one, that would be minus 22 as well.
Need a creative method

Roulettebeater

Okay,

i have found this sequence which seems to challenge your system

MISS   MISS   MISS   HIT       MISS   HIT
MISS   MISS   HIT       MISS   HIT       HIT
MISS   HIT     MISS   MISS   MISS   MISS
MISS   MISS   MISS   HIT    MISS   MISS
MISS   MISS   MISS   MISS   HIT       MISS
MISS   MISS   HIT       MISS   HIT       HIT
MISS   MISS   MISS   HIT    MISS   MISS
HIT       MISS   HIT    HIT       HIT    MISS

can you tell us how would you overcome it?
A dollar won is twice as sweet as as a dollar earned

Person S

RB, the easiest way to glue the first 6 spins and the next 6 spins - this will be the first line.
Instead of 6 games, you play 12.
Etc

Roulettebeater

Quote from: Person S on Nov 21, 02:16 PM 2019
RB, the easiest way to glue the first 6 spins and the next 6 spins - this will be the first line.
Instead of 6 games, you play 12.
Etc


Line1 |   MISS   MISS    MISS    HIT      MISS    HIT     MISS   MISS   HIT    MISS     HIT      HIT
Line2 |   MISS   HIT     MISS    MISS     MISS    MISS    MISS   MISS   MISS   HIT      MISS     MISS
Line3 |   MISS   MISS    MISS    MISS     HIT     MISS    MISS   MISS   HIT    MISS     HIT      HIT
Line4 |   MISS   MISS    MISS    HIT      MISS    MISS    HIT    MISS   HIT    HIT      HIT      MISS
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
LINE1>    -1    -1       -1     +1        -1      +1      -1     -1     +1     -1       +1       +1
LINE2>    -2    +2       -2               -2              -2     -2            +2       
LINE3>    -4             -4               +4              -4     -4                             
LINE4>    -8             -8                               +8     -8

TOTAL after 48 spins: -36!!!!
A dollar won is twice as sweet as as a dollar earned

Person S

It is clear that this will not succeed, in addition to smart progression, you need a smart bet, as Kali wrote.
Well, by the way, you can make the string even bigger.
See when you published the first version, where there were 6 spins in rows.
In line 5, you already had minus 50 if I'm not mistaken ... when they began to play 12, the loss decreased
Therefore, you need to somehow vary the length. IMHO

Kali49

PERSON your understanding is accurate.

Here is a basic bet selection, I wouldn't call it a smart one, but it delivers satisfying results.

Last two spins : RR
Bet : 2 units on Red.

Last two spins : RB
Bet : 1 unit on Red.

Last two spins : BR
Bet : 1 unit on Black.

Last two spins : BB
Bet : 2 units on Black.

This Betselection has smart progression integrated within it.

I encourage you try to integrate smart progression to your favorite bet selection strategy.
A collection of Roolet ideas
link:[url="s://roolet.flarum.cloud"]s://roolet.flarum.cloud[/url]

Kali49

I will move to different concepts.

This post is complete.
:thumbsup:

A collection of Roolet ideas
link:[url="s://roolet.flarum.cloud"]s://roolet.flarum.cloud[/url]

zooky88

Quote from: Kali49 on Nov 21, 04:39 PM 2019
PERSON your understanding is accurate.

Here is a basic bet selection, I wouldn't call it a smart one, but it delivers satisfying results.

Last two spins : RR
Bet : 2 units on Red.

Last two spins : RB
Bet : 1 unit on Red.

Last two spins : BR
Bet : 1 unit on Black.

Last two spins : BB
Bet : 2 units on Black.

This Betselection has smart progression integrated within it.

I encourage you try to integrate smart progression to your favorite bet selection strategy.

hi guys, glad to be here.

i started playing roulette by fun a few weeks ago and lets say that i had that beguinners luck with martingale until i blew it all.

so i started digging and investigating all different kinds of strategies and money management.

i will try the above progression method, so far im impressed with it. looks so simple but quite genius too.

tested on live account using small bets and made 25% in 10 minutes, got 10 reds in a row thats why i made that % so fast.

any advice on using the above since you have more spins than me on it?

thanks for sharing man, cheers from Portugal

-