• Welcome to #1 Roulette Forum & Message Board | www.RouletteForum.cc.

News:

Test the accuracy of your method to predict the winning number. If it works, then your system works. But tests over a few hundred spins tell you nothing.

Main Menu
Popular pages:

Roulette System

The Roulette Systems That Really Work

Roulette Computers

Hidden Electronics That Predict Spins

Roulette Strategy

Why Roulette Betting Strategies Lose

Roulette System

The Honest Live Online Roulette Casinos

2,565,726,409 to 1 ODDS - Number 8 hit 6x in-a-row!!!

Started by RP501, Mar 23, 03:14 AM 2020

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Joe

Quote from: Bebediktus3 on Mar 24, 09:43 AM 2020But this task is one of the best math tasks that are related to gambling.  Simply say which player will win in the long run...

I don't think you've been very clear in describing the problem, because your english isn't great. If one player bets for the sequence 4-5-6 and the other player bets for 6-6-6 it doesn't mean that the first player will win in the long run, assuming there was such a game. In fact it applies equally to roulette, and betting for #4 followed by #5 followed by #6 won't give you an advantage over betting for 3 consecutive #6's.
Logic. It's always in the way.

Steve

Are you serious?

Do the testing.

Who's in the stone age?
"The only way to beat roulette is by increasing the accuracy of predictions"
Roulettephysics.com ← Professional roulette tips
Roulette-computers.com ← Hidden electronics that predicts the winning number
Roulettephysics.com/roulette-strategy ← Why most systems lose

gorki

Quote from: Steve on Apr 03, 08:23 AM 2020Incorrect. All those sequences happen the same amount of times. Don't believe me? Do lots of testing.
show me a string of 32 black (or any EC) on live roulette and even rng
i will show you that the last 16 ec is repeated 13,14,15,16 times (32 spins in total) even on live roulette and "relatively" often

I have never seen 32 ec repetitions, not even on 145 000 live spins
CROATIA

Steve

Gorki, choose any sequence of 32 spins. Then see how long it takes to repeat. Its exactly the same as any other sequence.

Learn. It is so old. Its classic fallacy. Understand what im saying. It's not opinion. Its fact.
"The only way to beat roulette is by increasing the accuracy of predictions"
Roulettephysics.com ← Professional roulette tips
Roulette-computers.com ← Hidden electronics that predicts the winning number
Roulettephysics.com/roulette-strategy ← Why most systems lose

huskerdu

the odds of coming six same numbers in a row is : 1 / (37*37*37*37*37) = 1 / 69,343,957
So it is a mistake saying the generic theory that roylette don't see thew previous numbers so in every spin we have 1/37 chances to come up a number.
Yes it is 1/37 for every spin, but to come up specific numbers in six spins the statistics are : 1 / 69,343,957

Steve

Husker exactly what are you saying?

Are you saying some sequences are more likely?
"The only way to beat roulette is by increasing the accuracy of predictions"
Roulettephysics.com ← Professional roulette tips
Roulette-computers.com ← Hidden electronics that predicts the winning number
Roulettephysics.com/roulette-strategy ← Why most systems lose

huskerdu

Quote from: Steve on Apr 04, 05:34 PM 2020
Husker exactly what are you saying?

Are you saying some sequences are more likely?

The propability for specific numbers to come in a row is different from the propability for  any other random numbers from the rest of roulette numbers to come.
Lets say number 8 comes. The propability to come another nr. 8 is 1/37. But the propability to come any other number except 8 is 36/37. So we have 2,7% chances to come another 8 after the first 8 and  97,3% chances to come any other number except 8.
Lets say that two numbers 8 have come in a row. The propability for a third nr.8 in a row to come is 1/ (37*37) = 1/1.369  (0,073%). The propability for any other nr to come except 8 is 99,927.
And so on.....
So we may say that theoritically in every roulette has no memory, we may say that in every spin any number has a 1/37 propability to come, but there ara also statistics which give us different propabilities based on previeus spins.

Steve

Quote from: huskerdu on Apr 08, 02:04 AM 2020Lets say number 8 comes. The propability to come another nr. 8 is 1/37. But the propability to come any other number except 8 is 36/37

If the probability of the next number is still 1 in 37, then WHY do you exclude previous numbers from spinning next?

The wheel doesnt give a crap what numbers you want to exclude and why. It doesn't care about your reasoning or expectations.
"The only way to beat roulette is by increasing the accuracy of predictions"
Roulettephysics.com ← Professional roulette tips
Roulette-computers.com ← Hidden electronics that predicts the winning number
Roulettephysics.com/roulette-strategy ← Why most systems lose

Joe

Quote from: Steve on Apr 08, 02:31 AM 2020If the probability of the next number is still 1 in 37, then WHY do you exclude previous numbers from spinning next?

He's not excluding any numbers, but IF a number is going to hit multiple times in a row, then it must mean that other numbers can't hit. That's just the logic needed to get the calculations correct.
Logic. It's always in the way.

maestro

QuoteIt doesn't care about your reasoning or expectations.

it does...else would keep banging number 8 all day long... :twisted: :twisted:
told you  to come out of the cave
Law of the sixth...<when you play roulette there will always be a moron tells you that you will lose to the house edge>

huskerdu

Let's do some.maths.
The propability to come Black or Red in the first spin is 1/2  (50%.)
Let's say RED comes.
In the next spin, the propability to  come Black or Red is again 1/2 (50%).
But the propability to come e.g.  RED after RED is 1/4 because of this reason:
For two spins all the combinations are RB, RR, BR, BB. So we have 1/4 of chances to come a RR.
So maybe for the second spin by itself the chances of the RED to come is 1/2 but the chances to come RED after RED are 1/4 (25%).
For 3 spins we have the combinations:
RRR, RRB, RBB, RBR, BRR, BBR, BBB, BRB,.
So for 3 spins we have 1/8 (12,5%) chances for the RRR to come.
So maybe for the third spin by itself the chances of the RED to come is 1/2 but the chances to come RED after two REDs are 1/8 (12,5%).
And so on..... for the next spins dor the RED to continue coming the propabilities are 1/16, 1/32, 1/64, 1/128, 1/256, 1/512 .....
So think of,  instead of Black and Red to have one number against the rest of the numbers...

Richard Meisel


Richard Meisel

Mixing 2 probabilities. After 2 consecutive REDS, if you take 3 as the unit, the chances are 1/8. But the real Odds of RED hitting on the 3rd Spins is 18/38 on the American wheel and 18/37 on the European. Just to add: on the American 38 number wheel the number of possibilities after 38 Spins is 2 to the power of 38 which is 274,877,906,944 and on the European 37 number wheel the number of possibilities is 2 to the power of 37 is 137,438,953,472. These are very big numbers, in the trillions. So mathematically the real Odds of getting, for instance, 37 or 38 consecutive REDS is the same as any other 37 or 38 number. This is why I don't trust in counting Hits and Rehits and 12-14 Doubles in 42 Spins and the like. I prefer running a progression on the so called Even bets, winning about 80 per cent, losing 1 and Winning 4.

Steve

If your theories were correct and had value, you'd be winning fortunes. But you're not. "The proof is in the pudding".

Enough said.
"The only way to beat roulette is by increasing the accuracy of predictions"
Roulettephysics.com ← Professional roulette tips
Roulette-computers.com ← Hidden electronics that predicts the winning number
Roulettephysics.com/roulette-strategy ← Why most systems lose

Richard Meisel

Don't know you, Steve. I'm new to the forum. Be nice. Is Martin Silverthorne a part of this forum? I took his Super Neural Strategy and tweaked his Betting Progression and changed his Targets and his Betting scheme, and am Winning around 80 per cent. I'm using a random generator which I don't really trust and can't wait to get to Vegas as you can't play craps and roulette in Arizona. If you reply to this, please be nicer with your comments and please don't take this as personal.

-