Huskerdu,
It is widely known,
that worst ever recorded bm EC data, is 387hit/1000spins.

It is well
over 33.34% needed for labby to closed.
Can we think out, a good mild progression to win ?

You have absolutely right SWEET.
What I'm working on,  those days is that a winning system is not a system that wins in every session,  but a system that:
1. Wins more sessions than loses
2. The total units from the winning sessions are more than the total lost units from the lowing sessions.
And it is not  important only  the number of the winning sessions but what we earn and what we lose in every session.
If in 100 sessions, a system wins in  99 sessions and it loses in only 1 session all the money we have earned from the previous 99 sessions it doesn't work.
Anyway even if  there is not a winning system, it doesn't prevent us from keep searching and exchanging ideas and experiences in this forum
The goal is mutual

The problem with the soft progressions is that even if they are safer, we may play for hours just to win 1 single unit, if we have to to recover from some big previous losing streaks (if we ever manage to recover).
On the other hand, agressive progressions like Martingale may give us many and quick wins but, in case of big losing streaks, we lose all the money we have earned previously (in the best scenario).
Daedlock ?

Progression for 2 consecutive Wins to Win 1 unit: 1-1-1(1-2)-2-3-4(4-5)-6(6-7)-9(9-10)-14. Suggest you stop at 5 consecutive Losses and Double the progression, then if 10 consecutive Losses, double again.

Hi, Sweet, here is another interesting progression: continue with 1 Unit flat bets. If you reach -4 to -8 divide by 2 for next Bet, if you reach -9 to -27 divide by 3 for next Bet, if you reach -28 to -100 divide by 4 for next Bet, if over -100 divide by 5 for next Bet.

Quote from: Richard Meisel on May 12, 11:04 AM 2020Hi, Sweet, here is another interesting progression: continue with 1 Unit flat bets. If you reach -4 to -8 divide by 2 for next Bet, if you reach -9 to -27 divide by 3 for next Bet, if you reach -28 to -100 divide by 4 for next Bet, if over -100 divide by 5 for next Bet.

Richard, when you say reach -4 to -8  what exactly do you mean ?
-4 or -5 or 06 or -7 or -8 whatever we like ?