Steve's computers claim about a 50% advantage. This would crush the casino. Betting just $5,000 straight up on a single number at a time would net you about $150,000 per hour. Does this sound realistic to you at all? And we're supposed to believe that the casinos aren't worried about this, but they're worried about card counters gaining a .5% edge (a 100X smaller edge than Steve claims)?

If Steve's computers were legitimate, he would be at least a multibillionaire by using these computers himself.

Nor read the actual explanations about the amount bet tbh..or his stuff only seen his video test with a fixed camera and stuff..Looks good with the fixed camera
Theory is sound but actual use with a hidden camera waving about I can’t see as you can’t know for sure if it’s actually aiming right..

So maybe be lower bets with higher wins than losses

And he did say it to win big but  so much and  move on

So for me the only stumbling block would be camera accuracy

Theory and his static camera proves in that environment set up it works

In the casino hidden camera I’m just not convinced myself but that’s only my personal opinion

And he did say it to win big but  so much and  move on

I meant win a certain amount not to be noticed and move on

Quote from: pepper on Jul 19, 03:13 PM 2020Steve's computers claim about a 50% advantage. This would crush the casino. Betting just $5,000 straight up on a single number at a time would net you about $150,000 per hour. Does this sound realistic to you at all?

No, it's not realistic. Which is why I constantly say "The only limit is what you can win, without being detected".

This is what happens if you just try to win as much as you can bet (you get noticed):



Also the Ritz team who won £1,300.000 in 3 DAYS.

Do you really think the media reports 100% of the cases?

So again, the limit isnt based on edge. Its about avoiding detection.

Quote from: pepper on Jul 19, 03:13 PM 2020If Steve's computers were legitimate, he would be at least a multibillionaire by using these computers himself.

That's what people say when they dont know better. Almost everyone says that at first. Until they understand the limitations are not to do with the computer. They're to do with casino surveillance.

I get emails from many boneheads who say much what you said. And they think that's their proof it's all a scam. And the smarter people actually read what is said on my websites, and do proper research.

And btw, computers are not legal where I live. So when I play, my teams are in casinos for me (where it's legal), streaming live video of the wheel. I dont even need to leave home.

If you really want to know how it works, the information is already on my websites. But actually read my websites, before giving misguided opinions.

Quote from: 6th-sense on Jul 19, 04:23 PM 2020I can’t see as you can’t know for sure if it’s actually aiming right..

If you're playing alone, without anyone watching the video, the computer has various features that automatically aims the camera for you. It partly uses digital zoom. So if you're back from the wheel, you need only face the camera in the general direction - its very easy. Then the computer automatically detects and zooms on the wheel.

If the aim isnt quite right still, the redundancy is the computer even tells you where to aim, like up,left,right,down - even if it only sees a fraction of the wheel.

Thats just if you're playing alone.

But if you've got someone watching the video live (the operator), they can talk to players live at the table with hidden earpieces.

My computers are not just a piece of programming code and some phones. They're a bit more sophisticated.

I've gotten heat from casinos for just getting lucky before.  Even cashing out a few hundred dollars ahead in a smaller casino, and they won't like it.  Do that consistently, and they will like it even less. 

You have to avoid detection, whether you have an edge or not.