Then let me be very specific. We're talking about roulette, not the universe in general.

So I would like to inform you very specifically that

**ROULETTE IS PART OF THIS UNIVERSE** and you will not change this fact.

What I'm saying is that if there is some pattern of numbers or statistical event A which has occurred (such as 12 numbers unhit in the last 37 spins, aka LOTT), there is no correlation between it and what occurs in the following sequence of spins, which you can call event B. For example, if it turned out that one of those 12 numbers were to hit sooner, on average, than a randomly picked set of 12 numbers, that would be a correlation.

There are countless other events A and B which could have been used. The thing they all have in common is that for there to be dependence, some pattern or distribution of numbers which has already occurred DOES affect the probability of outcomes which haven't yet occurred. It doesn't matter if the probability is increased or decreased, just that it changes.

I already mentioned in one of the posts that what I am saying

**DOES NOT MEAN** that the next spin must be dependent on the previous spin, but that

**DOES NOT MEAN** that the correlation between the numbers does not exist and it

**DOES NOT MEAN** that the numbers are independent, because I have explained many times where the dependence comes from and the correlation is simply a consequence of the existence of this dependence.

I'm not the one who is saying there is dependence, you are. Where is your evidence for it?

My conclusions is based on

**COMMONLY KNOWN FACTS**, but you don't want to accept this facts, because they don't speak DIRECTLY about roulette.

As I already mentioned, there is a huge amount of evidence that independence is the reality for roulette

There is much more evidence that roulette cannot be independent of reality.