• Welcome to #1 Roulette Forum & Message Board | www.RouletteForum.cc.

## News:

WARNING: Forums often contain bad advice & systems that aren't properly tested. Do NOT believe everything. Read these links: The Facts About What Works & Why | How To Proplerly Test Systems | The Top 5 Proven Systems | Best Honest Online Casinos

## mi presento

Started by VENERE98, Oct 28, 07:32 AM 2020

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

#### Steve

Quote from: stranger90 on Nov 05, 07:20 PM 2020Lol, martingale and cold streets...you are a genius! Congrats!

We've all been there before. We've all thought we had it figured, only to be wrong.

Venere, respectfully you're wasting everyone's time. If you have real proof, please show it. But considering what you've posted so far, you're still very new to roulette.
"The only way to beat roulette is by increasing the accuracy of predictions"
Roulettephysics.com â† Professional roulette tips
Roulette-computers.com â† Hidden electronics that predicts the winning number
Roulettephysics.com/roulette-strategy â† Why most systems lose

#### Richard Meisel

Quote from: winforus on Nov 05, 07:28 PM 2020
In your video, you use progression upon losses. You increase the bets until you get a hit and then you go back to the starting bets.

This video proves the opposite: You actually donâ€™t have an edge. Your 6 numbers on video actually did worse than radom bets would.

Next time, only use flat betting.
Also you'll get the same betting 6 on a line, then 12 on a line, then 18 on a line, etc.

#### Steve

Venere, you've really got no idea what you're talking about. You've got the kind of theories that brand new players have. And very poor understanding of how things really are. I'm sorry you're wasting people's time here.
"The only way to beat roulette is by increasing the accuracy of predictions"
Roulettephysics.com â† Professional roulette tips
Roulette-computers.com â† Hidden electronics that predicts the winning number
Roulettephysics.com/roulette-strategy â† Why most systems lose

#### VENERE98

Quote from: winforus on Nov 05, 07:28 PM 2020
In your video, you use progression upon losses. You increase the bets until you get a hit and then you go back to the starting bets.

This video proves the opposite: You actually donâ€™t have an edge. Your 6 numbers on video actually did worse than radom bets would.

Next time, only use flat betting.

Actually I made this video, not to show that I win, but in order to make you understand that, if you are sure that a prediction comes out, I can increase the bet as I like, and sorry, maximum on the table and you can enter 1000 euros, I did more 4600, and anyway it's not the method of six takes, it's a visual way of mine, I could very well go upright not with martingale, but with coverage of 26 shots, always having a useful, and it's not a game of chance of a single day, now comes the good thing you'll see the next videos, in which I decide and command the random, you'll see a game both rng to the processor, and both the game live, but made with the right way of betting, my rule says, if I win every day 100 euros for 360 days in a year, my method is winning, everyone's dream and be able to win at least 100 euros a day, but let's make you understand the way,
luck is a matter of one day, and not 360 days in a year, look, but I see only chatter and suppositions, I at least enter the facts

#### VENERE98

Quote from: Steve on Nov 05, 07:37 PM 2020
We've all been there before. We've all thought we had it figured, only to be wrong.

Venere, respectfully you're wasting everyone's time. If you have real proof, please show it. But considering what you've posted so far, you're still very new to roulette.
this and for you, promote winning programs but giving them at exorbitant prices, I have mine but that wins in every casino whether it's live, whether it's terrestrial, whether it's randomized, attention I do not sell and I have no intention, to give, when in 21 shots you can win with bets of 1 euro and maximum exposure of 28 euros, and have a profit of 346 euros look at photos, should make you think, I have you believe that only you have found the winning solution, but I have its difference, I enter the evidence, I can also make a demo video and prove to win 100 thousand euros, to be a true thing, I would say to open the casino live and make a demo video and prove that you win, I must point out that you talk about hybrid at exorbitant costs, you talk about a 2500 usd version, but you say that it is not like the hybrid version, sorry and also say that in case the player loses, it is not the program's fault, ahahaha and who would be to blame, steve listen, I have finished believing donkeys that fly, a long time ago.

#### VENERE98

Quote from: Steve on Nov 05, 06:49 PM 2020
Verne, in your video you go from about \$4500 to \$5500. On RNG.

Is that supposed to be special? It's supposed to make us "drool"? Keep in mind there are many just as useless results posted here daily, like the endless barrage of short-term bankroll trend charts.
Of course I've seen Mr. steve, but it's not my case, I've entered real winnings, and it's very different from demo videos, and graphics, the system must be tested playing for real,

#### VENERE98

Quote from: Richard Meisel on Nov 05, 07:50 PM 2020
Also you'll get the same betting 6 on a line, then 12 on a line, then 18 on a line, etc.

Dear, but you know what you're talking about, but have you ever seen 18 randomized numbers not come out for 20 shots, I have, so as you can see from the picture, and we're talking about random RNG, there is a way to beat them, and I always do, with maximum exposure of 36 euros in 16 boule have a profit of 216 euros and have it every day, not 'by all, but as I have already' written, I will enter what 'you want, I enter facts and not words, and do not come to tell me, in 30 days will see, I play for 8 years, and study for 13 years, in my way, and the earnings are seen,