0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Steve

• 7113
• Top Bloke
• Rated: +522
Re: mi presento
Nov 05, 07:37 PM 2020
Lol, martingale and cold streets...you are a genius! Congrats!

We've all been there before. We've all thought we had it figured, only to be wrong.

Venere, respectfully you're wasting everyone's time. If you have real proof, please show it. But considering what you've posted so far, you're still very new to roulette.

Richard Meisel

• 100+ posts Member
• 142
• Member
• Rated: +12
Re: mi presento
Nov 05, 07:50 PM 2020
In your video, you use progression upon losses. You increase the bets until you get a hit and then you go back to the starting bets.

This video proves the opposite: You actually don’t have an edge. Your 6 numbers on video actually did worse than radom bets would.

Next time, only use flat betting.
Also you'll get the same betting 6 on a line, then 12 on a line, then 18 on a line, etc.

Steve

• 7113
• Top Bloke
• Rated: +522
Re: mi presento
Nov 05, 09:19 PM 2020
Venere, you've really got no idea what you're talking about. You've got the kind of theories that brand new players have. And very poor understanding of how things really are. I'm sorry you're wasting people's time here.

VENERE98

• 50+ posts Member
• 69
• Member
• Rated: +7
Re: mi presento
Nov 06, 04:11 AM 2020
In your video, you use progression upon losses. You increase the bets until you get a hit and then you go back to the starting bets.

This video proves the opposite: You actually don’t have an edge. Your 6 numbers on video actually did worse than radom bets would.

Next time, only use flat betting.

Actually I made this video, not to show that I win, but in order to make you understand that, if you are sure that a prediction comes out, I can increase the bet as I like, and sorry, maximum on the table and you can enter 1000 euros, I did more 4600, and anyway it's not the method of six takes, it's a visual way of mine, I could very well go upright not with martingale, but with coverage of 26 shots, always having a useful, and it's not a game of chance of a single day, now comes the good thing you'll see the next videos, in which I decide and command the random, you'll see a game both rng to the processor, and both the game live, but made with the right way of betting, my rule says, if I win every day 100 euros for 360 days in a year, my method is winning, everyone's dream and be able to win at least 100 euros a day, but let's make you understand the way,
luck is a matter of one day, and not 360 days in a year, look, but I see only chatter and suppositions, I at least enter the facts

https://imagizer.imageshack.com/img924/858/AmbArB.jpg
https://imagizer.imageshack.com/img922/5346/V8Qq4e.jpg
https://imagizer.imageshack.com/img923/255/oOSpaQ.jpg

VENERE98

• 50+ posts Member
• 69
• Member
• Rated: +7
Re: mi presento
Nov 06, 04:26 AM 2020
We've all been there before. We've all thought we had it figured, only to be wrong.

Venere, respectfully you're wasting everyone's time. If you have real proof, please show it. But considering what you've posted so far, you're still very new to roulette.
this and for you, promote winning programs but giving them at exorbitant prices, I have mine but that wins in every casino whether it's live, whether it's terrestrial, whether it's randomized, attention I do not sell and I have no intention, to give, when in 21 shots you can win with bets of 1 euro and maximum exposure of 28 euros, and have a profit of 346 euros look at photos, should make you think, I have you believe that only you have found the winning solution, but I have its difference, I enter the evidence, I can also make a demo video and prove to win 100 thousand euros, to be a true thing, I would say to open the casino live and make a demo video and prove that you win, I must point out that you talk about hybrid at exorbitant costs, you talk about a 2500 usd version, but you say that it is not like the hybrid version, sorry and also say that in case the player loses, it is not the program's fault, ahahaha and who would be to blame, steve listen, I have finished believing donkeys that fly, a long time ago.

https://imagizer.imageshack.com/img924/858/AmbArB.jpg

VENERE98

• 50+ posts Member
• 69
• Member
• Rated: +7
Re: mi presento
Nov 06, 04:42 AM 2020
Verne, in your video you go from about \$4500 to \$5500. On RNG.

Is that supposed to be special? It's supposed to make us "drool"? Keep in mind there are many just as useless results posted here daily, like the endless barrage of short-term bankroll trend charts.
Of course I've seen Mr. steve, but it's not my case, I've entered real winnings, and it's very different from demo videos, and graphics, the system must be tested playing for real,

VENERE98

• 50+ posts Member
• 69
• Member
• Rated: +7
Re: mi presento
Nov 06, 05:37 AM 2020
Also you'll get the same betting 6 on a line, then 12 on a line, then 18 on a line, etc.

Dear, but you know what you're talking about, but have you ever seen 18 randomized numbers not come out for 20 shots, I have, so as you can see from the picture, and we're talking about random RNG, there is a way to beat them, and I always do, with maximum exposure of 36 euros in 16 boule have a profit of 216 euros and have it every day, not 'by all, but as I have already' written, I will enter what 'you want, I enter facts and not words, and do not come to tell me, in 30 days will see, I play for 8 years, and study for 13 years, in my way, and the earnings are seen,

https://imagizer.imageshack.com/img924/6360/ovrwNO.jpg

VENERE98

• 50+ posts Member
• 69
• Member
• Rated: +7
Re: mi presento
Nov 06, 07:29 AM 2020
Venere, you've really got no idea what you're talking about. You've got the kind of theories that brand new players have. And very poor understanding of how things really are. I'm sorry you're wasting people's time here.

You're wrong STEVE, I know very well the random, and also the ballistics, watch the video, below, and then pull the sums, I show in the video, that with accuracy you can take in certain shots, and at the end of the video if you notice I entered the time, well and at a stroke and 'out forecast, start studying the cycles, I did it for many years, this is my way of seeing roulette, simple but effective and winning, 360 days a year, and not 1 day yes and 100 no, however, a typical example what you see in the program and 'a typical setting on cycles, but there are 1000 combinations of cycle, which lead you to win, there is nothing to explain, make a program, and try and you'll prove me right, you're very good at programming, so for you and your staff, it would be a very simple thing, and certainly you have designed something you were looking for to really fight roulette, attention we do not come now to say, but you made a video in fan, of course, to make you understand, as on the other hand someone else has shown that you can easily win 30 thousand dollars in 2 hours ahahahahah but I can also do one live while I play, both in processor and live, no problem, beware the forecast is dictated by the average of the outputs, if in 12 shots the average remains, at low levels, you expect a delay of that forecast of 6 shots, and as you can see takes it immediately hello

Popular pages: