Destroying RNG

[Interceptor]

For the last few years, I've been fighting rng roulette exclusively, so I don't play live roulette, only rng simulation roulette. Its main advantage is that it has the ability to play quickly and I did the testing myself for real money. The ultimate goal was to find a system that can beat it and prove that rng roulette is not fake as many say. So far my results are satisfactory, so I'm wondering if anyone else is playing against rng roulette and what are your experiences?

[nottophammer]

Interceptor
Before UK gov: stopped £100 max spins on FOBT in UK bookmakers, that's what I played.
I was collecting 60 spin results. But unlike the math crew i collected 1st 40 spins in blocks of 10 spins.
Don't know how long was using them. But I was wanting to know how many spins non-hits take to show. Now, with the bookies data and the General's 10'330 spins and airball results from channel ITV showing jackpot joy spins, plus Live German results posted by Ignatus.
It showed those 40 spins usually has 24 of the starting 37, so 16 repeats. Then at 60 spins non-hits were 29.5, round up to 30. 30 of the starting 37 have hit once and these 30 give 30 repeats.
The average has been posted so many times. 9-7-5-3&30. Repeats must be the reverse 1-3-5-7&30
 
Read the excel.

[Interceptor]

I also initially relied on the history of the last 100 numbers, but it always turned out that the history of numbers doesn't mean much and that the law of thirds simply doesn't mean anything and that it leads me in the wrong direction, it all seemed like the rng wanted to trick me and avoid my bets, but it was just a coincidence with a system that is losing.

[Interceptor]

It seems nottopharmer that you and I are the only ones researching rng, that's why we succeeded in that mission, we went to a higher level of roulette playing, and that's a big advantage over other players because the future is rng.