PROMISED CONSTANT WINNING BET

[superman]

@ drazen, I am not insulting anyone, I was merely pointing out that over 88 pages the method has changed 3 times, by the time I get it coded it may have changed again, depending on other peoples results of course, you are taking it the wrong way fella

[Drazen]

Not at all my friend. You havent even read all these 88 pages right. If you did you wouldnt be saying that. There are several methods based on same principal in the thread, but ABC bet has only one tweak and that is the one with avoiding chops. Maybe ill got scold words from Flat for even stressing all this to you, but i know that even that wont change your attidue or anything about you just said and the way you are thinking and connecting things.


Regards


Drazen

[superman]

You haven't even read all these 88 pages right

Correct, I hate reading long threads but someone asked me if I could have a look and code it into the bot. So I wouldn't normally bother.

ABC bet has only one tweak and that is the one with avoiding chops

It's not possible to know whats coming or when you need avoiding actions, changes are made after the fact.

Maybe ill got scold words from Flat for even stressing all this to you

You'll be fine mate, he's a nice guy.

but i know that even that won't change your attidue or anything about you just said and the way you are thinking and connecting things

Yeah, you are probably right, let's just agree to disagree on this then, sorry to have upset you.

[Juiced91]

But why must we read through all the 88pages? If someone could just be kind enough and give us the "new" method so we can all have ago at testing it. The people that know it seem to ridicule those that dont but dont seem to give the light of day to anyone thats trying to understand what is happening. Many people are trying to understand and even those that have read still dont understand.

So if someone who could just explain the rules in basic terms then we can all try understand what is happening. Thanks

[superman]

So if someone who could just explain the rules in basic terms then we can all try understand what is happening

Maybe from someone who is actually winning with it rather than someone who just appears to know whats going on.

I have a quick question for drazen, on the spreadsheet in red at the top, did you read it? well incase you didn't, it says

 

SINCE YESTERDAY HAD A BAD DAY WITH MANY CHOPS LOSING 260 CHIPS TODAY HAVE PLAY AS SHOWN BELLOW

I rest my case, it changed AFTER a big loss

[Drazen]

You are same as all others... You are lazy to put the gold into your pocket. You want others to do that for you...I mean you dont even try to figure all this out, you are just looking in wrong way. Yes Flat before, and me now, pointed this on purpose, not to bother with people like your thinking... But again you wont figure why and what i said now.


Regards


Drazen

[superman]

I'm not going to get into a mudslinging match with you, your not worth it, you just hop from thread to thread telling everyone they are silly, its all rather sad, maybe you need to grow up a bit more, have they dropped yet?

I'll wait for the next loss and see what changes.

[Drazen]

Nothing will change i ll tell you straight. Why, beacuse most of people like you here are playing on RNG-s. That is first thing. Then because some other also. And you re definitely right. Not much bothering with stupid things from others . Not saying that about someones ideas or when someone is trying to understand something and maybe has problems at the start. I am saying about wrong/stupid attitudes about this game.
Regards


Drazen

[birdhands]

Maybe from someone who is actually winning with it rather than someone who just appears to know what's going on.

I have a quick question for drazen, on the spreadsheet in red at the top, did you read it? well incase you didn't, it says

 

SINCE YESTERDAY HAD A BAD DAY WITH MANY CHOPS LOSING 260 CHIPS TODAY HAVE PLAY AS SHOWN BELLOW

[/l]

[/q][/t][/t][/t] [/l] [/t] [/l] [/t] [/l] I rest my case, it changed AFTER a big loss I don't want to get too involved here, but I do want to point out that the system has developed over time, maybe even improved, but not changed too dramatically.  This loss of 260 represents less than 3 sessions worth of profit; relatively minor, really.

[Drazen]

@ birdhands. Yep my friend, good thinking. Apply something similar in your tests/sessions and conclude something. Or there is way you don't even have to bother with loss side on your count with this tweak in bet?? I don't know??
Regards


Drazen

[F_LAT_INO]

Maybe from someone who is actually winning with it rather than someone who just appears to know what's going on.

I have a quick question for drazen, on the spreadsheet in red at the top, did you read it? well incase you didn't, it says

 

SINCE YESTERDAY HAD A BAD DAY WITH MANY CHOPS LOSING 260 CHIPS TODAY HAVE PLAY AS SHOWN BELLOW

[/l]

[/q][/t][/t][/t] I rest my case, it changed AFTER a big loss --Well I just returned home from the airball session with 540 chips in plus,and whats more interesting never reach the fourth step.Well this is from someone that is actually winning with this method.......you believe or not I really wouldn't care......and my intentions here is to help ppl.for free as it would be self insulting to try to sell........its not my way of doing things thatway.

[F_LAT_INO]

Reply #1256 statedbrirdhands stateddrazen statedSo am I to assume we are playing the last 2 UNIQUE secotrs no matter how big the gap is between them?
In essence we could have a situation where we have
B
A
A
A
A
A
A
So would we play A B for the above?

Ofcourse after 3th. spin.

[Proofreaders2000]

Glad to see you back F_LAT_INO.

[F_LAT_INO]

Glad to see you back F_LAT_INO.

Thanks Proof.

[RouletteExplorer]

"""even though people would get a holy grail..still they would search for better methods...."""

Why is this method the holy grail?