• Welcome to #1 Roulette Forum & Message Board | www.RouletteForum.cc.

News:

WARNING: Forums often contain bad advice & systems that aren't properly tested. Do NOT believe everything. Read these links: The Facts About What Works & Why | How To Proplerly Test Systems | The Top 5 Proven Systems | Best Honest Online Casinos

Main Menu
Popular pages:

Roulette System

The Roulette Systems That Really Work

Roulette Computers

Hidden Electronics That Predict Spins

Roulette Strategy

Why Roulette Betting Strategies Lose

Roulette System

The Honest Live Online Roulette Casinos

PROMISED CONSTANT WINNING BET

Started by F_LAT_INO, Jun 25, 03:19 PM 2010

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 37 Guests are viewing this topic.

vile

I also went there..whou, can't understand much,any help mr.Flat.would be welcome.

vundarosa

Quote from: Amazin on Feb 21, 10:49 AM 2012
This is certainly the longest thread i have seen on a roulette forum. I still don't understand it but i will do some more reading. For now i just want to know if its still a winning system before i go head and read every single page on here

--------------
yes this is mostly a winning system. mind you that Flatino recommends a 1000u BR. I've played with 200u in the past and still made some good profit. However you need to find a table that allows you enough time to place all bets if playing online and with a progression.

funny is, when i try the same approach on 2 dozs/2 cols it doesn't work, even thou we're still betting 24 numbers at a time........


vundarosa

vundarosa

Quote from: vile on Feb 21, 01:51 PM 2012
I also went there..whou, can't understand much,any help mr.Flat.would be welcome.

--------------
@Vile, what exactly you don't understand?, maybe i can somehow help....

vundarosa

vile

Been unsuccessfull getting ih touch with mr.Flat...but there are many different
approaches,which do you find the best mr.vundarosa.

nayan007

Hi F_LAT_INO,

This is very useful. Thank you for sharing it with us

vile

And finally after long studies I got it.
It is incredible.With a tweak I found
version 8 a solid winner.Thanks mr.Flat.

jarabo002

Quote from: vile on Apr 20, 04:08 PM 2012
And finally after long studies I got it.
It is incredible.With a tweak I found
version 8 a solid winner.Thanks mr.Flat.

I guess the winner with a system is infinite bankroll.

I have tried it in many ways with Mr. Ophis tracker, but I continue to study the system.

Try with a prigresión type Oscar Grind
Uno de Badajoz que pasaba por aquí.

Drazen

Quote from: vile on Apr 20, 04:08 PM 2012
And finally after long studies I got it.
It is incredible.With a tweak I found
version 8 a solid winner.Thanks mr.Flat.
I am very glad mr. vile you found it. And new tweak also to be even better? Nice.


You remembered me to say something that  i wanted to post few weeks ago, lol. I Didnt heard that anyone who was playing this for real was in minus longterm.  I know that definitely mr. Flat was winning on every day basis and i assure you that he even doesnt remeber when he lost with it.
Also the guy jon86 (was posting in the thread, you had to see him) was playing that for real. Although he has gone from forum long time ago i managed to ask him about his playing of this bet before i totaly lost contact with him.
He played excatly as mr. flat reccomended and after more than a month i asked him how is he doing. He said that to me that he had lost session but he was about 3000-4000 thousands units in plus, which is excatly as 3/1 win ratio as mr flat said he had with this bet.
Maybe he found his golden egg with this and run away from forums... I honestly hope he did.


Good luck and congratulations


Drazen

pedro

Yes a big thanks to Mr Flat ,I have attempted to contact him but without success.
Could someone please update me with how version 8 is played ?

Many thanks Pedro

GamblerMickey

This thread is long and getting confusing but is the following still considered as version 8 ?


Quote from: ophis on Jun 12, 03:09 PM 2011


-----
PCWB mod8
1. Wait until in last 4 spins 1 sector did not appear.
2. Bet last 2 different sectors.
3. After LOSE wait for 4 spins in which one sector did not appear.
4. Start betting last 2 different sectors.
5. GOTO 3.

Drazen

No, i am afraid ophis didnt grasped that full correct here..


You observe last 3 spins in which you must have 2 or 1 different sectors, not all 3.


In other words you dont bet when you have i.e. this (ABC,BCA,ACB.. and all other combinations with last 3 diferent sectors)


Once again, i ll show you how this should look in a session. Real play example.


Good luck


Drazen

jarabo002

Then, Is the system correct in Mr. Ophis tracker?

I am left with doubt. :question:

If not, then I have not been playing fine until today.
Uno de Badajoz que pasaba por aquí.

Drazen

I am afraid it is so. This is correct way of playing as i show you.


I dont use MST for any system and i didnt saw this earlier because i relly only in my eyes and mind.


This bet has about 15 versions, several havent been published and i have been working with mr. flat on all of them...


When one knows this bet  so good he cant avoid longterm profits, that is all i can say to you.


Also, you can find mr. F_LAT_INO-s attached session when he published version 8, so you will see that is difference than in Ophises MST. Obviously it was misunderstanding beetween coder and system maker, which happens sometimes...


Dont be lazy, study all attached sessions and versions, wrong way is just to use MST without thinking and not knowing what are you doing.





If still is something unclear, shoot.







Regards




Drazen

jarabo002

I fully understand that you do not want to give more details.

Anyway, there are still many hours learning, maybe one day I discovered the secret.

Thanks for answering.

Gracias.
Uno de Badajoz que pasaba por aquí.

ophis

Quote from: drazen_cro on Apr 30, 08:29 AM 2012
In other words you don't bet when you have i.e. this (ABC,BCA,ACB.. and all other combinations with last 3 diferent sectors)

This is a Tweak for PCWB8.

And it is implemented in to MST:
"Numbers of spins without chops"

Quote from: drazen_cro on Apr 30, 01:59 PM 2012
Also, you can find mr. F_LAT_INO-s attached session when he published version 8, so you will see that is difference than in Ophises MST. Obviously it was misunderstanding beetween coder and system maker, which happens sometimes...

Some of the attached FLAT sessions had errors in them. And it was confirmed by him.
Multi Systems Tracker
➨ [url="//rmst.forumer.com"]RMST.forumer.com[/url]

-