Beating roulette with math..

[aleks06]

ok nice whats ur win target for a session ? u play on RNG ?

[Fripper]

I play at betvoyager.

I play until I get tired, after that you only make mistakes. Mistakes can be crucial sometimes, but in this progression we are very flexible, so we can just transfer some units to another bet if we miss some and so on..

My sessions have been from +22 to + 45.
I have played 6 sessions.


----
What do you guys think about instead of bet on 75/25 figures we can bet on 87/13 figures. Belgian plays with 87/13 figures he says. Not sure yet what he mean by it tho..
I have some ideas tho, that needs testing.

[aleks06]

so you trust RNG fripper ? I guess you are playing on the "no ZERO" wheel

I did my second session plz have a look on this

77 spins  +40

----
What do you guys think about instead of bet on 75/25 figures we can bet on 87/13 figures.  Belgian plays with 87/13 figures he says.  Not sure yet what he mean by it tho. .
I have some ideas tho, that needs testing.
:thumbsup:

when he/you say 75/25 and 87/13 u talk about the odds when u combine even chances like playing on black and low ? I never really understood what belgians means by this

[Fripper]

So you trust RNG fripper ? I guess you are playing on the "no ZERO" wheel

I did my second session plz have a look on this

77 spins  +40

I don't trust it with my life, but enough to play on it 
I haven't seen anything weird yet.

Your session was fine until spins 31, have a look there and I finished the spins after that.

when he/you say 75/25 and 87/13 you talk about the odds when you combine even chances like playing on black and low ? I never really understood what belgians means by this

No, Belgian talked about the odds when we play in pairs like 75/25 or 87/13, that is that you play in pairs like RB BR or RBB BBR and so on. 
I'm not sure yet how he means either..

Divide into more ECs and bet like Black and low at the same time is a precaution to keep the bets low.

[chrisbis]

Belgian means to play  FOR a pair of OUTCOMES. (Playing for a result to occur)

Like this. (Imagine U are talking to Urself...................)

"I am setting out to play for this result- RED, then RED

.....and then I am playing for this result to turn up- BLACK, then RED."

Do U get it now?

[aleks06]

thank you again fripper

do you ever have divided a bet into 3 figures ?

[Fripper]

I'm not sure I understand what you mean Chris 
I thought Belgian meant:
Play in pairs like RB or BB

We bet red:
R win, don't play next spin in that pair.
B
R win don't play next spin in that pair
R
B lost
R Win
R Win don't play next..

That's how I play it, doesn't mean I'm right.

[Fripper]

Thank you again fripper

do you ever have divided a bet into 3 figures ?

Yes, when you feel comfortable with it you can try one of Bayes horror sessions in this thread.

In that ones I divided bets into 3 figures.

[chrisbis]

We are both right.

It means the same thing.

to play FOR a pair of results. Red/Red is a pair, then play for Black/Red, is another.

Tho each event is singular, tho he(Belgian) combines them to accentuate the wins potential.

So U WERE right Marcus. Spot on.

[Fripper]

Great that we are on the same level here 

[aleks06]

how do you determine the pairs ? like RR RB BB BR BB RR . . .

[chrisbis]

That's all down to UR game plan..

In other words, it more to do with how U want to play the game.

Of course, past history MAY help U decide, such that, if U are in the middle of a choppy sequence, then maybe U play for direct chops.

If the marque/wheel is running a series of a certain colour, or EC, (ODD/EVEN, HIGH/LOW) then U will bet according to the type of play that U think might be on its way to U in the form of forthcoming results.

[Fripper]

You can play like Chris says but I don't do it.

I always bet on Red.
I always follow these rules, I don't care what pair that comes out.

1. If you win first bet in a pair, don't bet the last spin in that pair.

2. If you lose first and win the second bet, start another pair directly.

It's that simple.

Now, maybe I sound like an repeating machine 

[aleks06]

hey fripper

would u plz check this session I won t bother you again after this one :p

I think I got It now. 

The most interesting part start at cell#391

[aleks06]

cell #434 the "?" is a "->"