8 split system

[chrisbis]

i think the next step with this is to work out a progression and then keep a record of units won/lost.
as yet, this hasn't been done and so the testing doesn't mean as much.

Is there a tracker anywhere for that requirement?

[ewarwoowar]

there will be a tracker for this somewhere chris, but as yet we haven't worked out a suitable progression, so we don't have all the info.
it's relatively easy to track though. manually in a b&m casino wouldn't be a problem.

[GLC]

This came about as a result of testing droganson's six splits to win system.


of these 209 plays,

82 have hit on the first spin
55 hit on the 2nd spin,
32 hit on the 3rd spin,
14 on the 4th,
10 on the 5th,
6 on the 6th,
2 on the 7th,
3 on the 8th,
2 on the 9th,
2 on the 10th,
1 on the 11th.

so, I hope that's clear and a  suitable progression can be worked out. do we use a six leg progression and take any hit that comes , to recover later.
or do we go on and bet until a hit, still having to recover later?

One of the obstacles to overcome are these last 4 games where you didn't hit until the 8th -11th bets.  That means you had to lose 7 bets before hitting.  And it can and will go further than the 11th bet, so we have to have a bet method that only goes as far as the 3rd bet I think and then we just have to take the loss and hope that we win enough winning on the 1st 3 bets to stay ahead of the times we lose on the 4th bet thru infinity.  Otherwise, I think we should consider a D'Alembert type bet method like +1-1 or +2-2.

Of course this is not taking into consideration that triggers may be worth looking at.

Regards,

G

[ewarwoowar]

george, this is exactly the sort of input i was hoping for!

because the hits come quickly with this, i've thought that we should employ a limited progression and increase the unit size next time round, should we take a loss.
not sure about 3 steps though, if we could work out something that went to 5 or 6 steps, that would cover the majority of the hits.
so far, out of 235 games encompassing over 3000 spins, hits within the first six steps have occurred 224 times.
surely this could be factored into a progression?

thank you for your ideas.

[ewarwoowar]

getting down to brass tacks, i thought i'd better start applying a progression to some of the samples i've put this system through.
i picked two sample tests from the ones i've done, randomly, and applied a 3,5 and 6 step progression:- 1, 2, 3, 5, 9, 17.

the sessions were:-
1. 664 spins giving me 51 games
2. 880 spins giving me 72 games

results for session 1:-
3 step prog -136 units loss
5 step prog -70 units loss
6 step prog +132 units profit

results for session 2:-
3 step prog -16 units loss
5 step prog +308 units profit
6 step prog +36 units profit

i'll carry on testing and report back, meanwhile if anyone has any concrete ideas re another progression, please feel free to give your input.

cheers.

[chrisbis]

What are Ur riggers again for the 8 splits?

[ewarwoowar]

just track 8 unique splits and then use these to bet. 

[chrisbis]

Single entity Unique or have U tried repeater Unique?

This would formulate a different approach!

Longer tracking initially, but maybe a greater, wider 'Motorway Path' to travel along, picking up repeater hikers along the journey? ?

Its a transition from possible getting warm- to hot potato zones. 


(I know- its time for my medicine, I'm bonkers!)

[ewarwoowar]

no, i've just been tracking until 8 splits have hit.
sometimes a split may hit 4 times in tracking. i've thought about the possibility of disregarding splits that hit say, 3 or more times, but as yet i've not tracked that way.