NitriX's solution

[nitrix]

Hi everyone.

I hope you guys arn't too tired because if you're open-minded enough, you might find what I have to say interesting.

Ehm.. I know I'm new here, but I read this forum since a very long time as a Guest. There is one big thing I noticed: We all have the same goal, yet everyone is arguing on which way is better to achieve that goal.

You know what? That's freaking brilliant (:

No I'm not crazy, it's just the fact that I noticed I didn't learn much from any systems here (even tho I did a bit unconsciously), but I did learn from reading arguments exchange between members!

Today I want to thank iggiv for his stubbornness, I admire you man. We all think differently and, when confronted, react differently. Well this guy said:

"Yes, I understand, but sorry, you will sail your boat -- all of you, and maybe hundreds and thousands guys like you, and I will sail mine with your kind permission." - It wasn't dedicated to me, but hey, I liked it.

I think that's how the famous people that were previously tagged "Insane" before are now-a-days remembered as "Genious". All thinkers, no matter on what side they are, have something to teach to the opposites.

Iggiv, I think I just found the solution right now to Roulette and I would like to thank you for that, and also share the basic idea behind it with the forum. I warn you guys, because I'm human, I'll keep the real solution a secret, but I swear I'll use the money it earns to help as many people as I can. I'm not someone greedy on money, simply on secrets.

Here we go.



I remember saying if there was something that'd work with roulette, it wouldn't be agaisn't the odd, nor a progression... and I think THIS is it! I got it!

These are what I learned from Roulette (might be different from one person to another):

- Don't bother with Zero, if you can make money without, you can also make money with.

- Always think of Roulette as a perfect game, everything break even in the long run.
Say you're betting on the even chances. 2 ideal spins, red and black.
Once you win. Once you lose. You break even.

Playing dozens, 3 ideal spins would be D1, D2 and D3.
Say you're betting on two dozens. Once you win 1 unit. Then you win 1 unit again. And finally you lose your previously earned 2 units. You break even.

Say you're betting on 35 straight numbers.....
You'll win 35 times, the 36th you'll lose your previously earned units. You again break even.

You get the drift.

- Bet selections simply change the rate at which you'll eventually, break even.

- Money management is a rather complex topic, use wisely
I studied it and most likely everyone here. It should be used wisely because that too change the rate... but you'll again eventually break even.

It just substitute your money into more rounds.

- Sessions

Everyone who don't realise that multiple sessions is just a bigger one divided into multiple days got it wrong. The odds are still the same as playing one session non-stop! It's just easier on your brainz.

link:://rouletteforum.cc/index.php?topic=7482.75#msg68267



That being said too, what I my plan? Get ready, it's condensed!

You can't evade odds. So we all try to push further the inevitable with systems. All systems are betting against a specific pattern they expect to never happen or nearly never. Truth is it's gonna happen at some point after X many spins. Therefore what can you do?

Don't play more than X spins; yes in your entire life.

Whaao, that's insane? I don't think so. I designed a system that can win 100'000 spins. Yes it's very easily do-able, there's a lot of good systems on here. What happens is (for example: Martingale) once you lose a certain amount of times, then you're fucked. But that kind of lost is expected only once whitin X many spins. If you designed your system, it should be easy to calculate what the odds are, and therefore, never play more than that many spins... in your entire life.

Because the system only start to fails past that.

If you were lucky enough to not hit a pattern that is being due. Put the money in your pocket and stop betting that pattern.

People are mad because they don't have a system that is consistently a winner, like forever.
Well I'm gonna teach you something: 1 unit can be just about ANY size you want.

If you can manage to make a single unit, that's maybe 10k you just make, or 1million, tell me about it? Which one do you prefer?

Well with a system, the awesome part is that you're "ALMOST" guaranteed to make a certain amount of units before the system is being "risked", thus, past 100'000 spins in my case.

So:
- Money management will take care of the up&downs before 100'000 spins.
- I won't play past 100'000 spins.
- I'm left with say 2000 units.

Okay that sucks if that's all you'll make in a lifetime.
Maybe not....

Because I decided the size of my units are going to be exponential.

And then the bank will take care of giving me my annual share without me doing any gambling at all.

[RouletteExplorer]

I am very exausted now to explain to you that all ur thinking is completely WRONG but unfortunately it is.
Let me just tell you that you are not the 1st one that came up with this wrong thinking...others did it as well and they are crying about their lost money even though they never passed the spins that their system won in their tests....

Anyway I wish to you all the best my friend and happy furure winnings with ur idea.

[iggiv]

well, thanx for being nice, Nitrix, but i did not get the idea. yes, be able to win just one unit would be nice, but it is not always possible...how can u make it possible most of the time? i don't get it

[Proofreaders2000]

Of course I could lose everything, I have the exact same chances as betting 20M on 5 double street. You could still lose on the 6th. Well except you don't start with 20 million of course xD

But the final, overall odds are still 5/6 of this strategy working.
(Or greater, depending on your system).

It's safer than betting you entire life earnings on RED ............... *cough* ...

At some point you shall just leave gambling..

Well said.  I would even suggest bettors refrain from gambling if it is viewed as anything other than entertainment.  Too many people have their hard earned money for retirement at risk in mutual funds (note the U.S. Stock Market lately).

[nitrix]

That's how i'm planning to play. A progression like you mentioned is needed for the system to work of course. The system is strong, but I expect big losing bets at some point. I'm very rational, it have to lose. I like to think it'll a winner but maths tells something else.

As far as I can remember, maths never failed for me. Odds are what they are and yeah.

I just think even if it earns in the short/middle term, it'll not do so forever. Then I better quit before it tank. Going past 100'000 spins would be taking risks the system wasn't planned for (EVEN if it can handle very bad runs with progressions, and betting small units, I prefer to stay safe)

[darrnyf]

i just play at betvoyager no zero(no house edge)adn i don't even know roulette has a zero..LoL..and i think is completely random...am earning that's y am saying..no its just my opinion though i may lose

hey y don't u disclose your bet that has passed 1 lac spins graph...with 50000 profit...u said this forum is family to u..then y the hell..your doing such nonsense..just showing the graph and profits at betvoyager..at skype and not disclosing the system

[Chrisbis]

What is  " 1 lac spins graph" ?

[darrnyf]

What is  " 1 lac spins graph" ?

past one lac spins with profit...smells like a shop window

[superman]

What is "lac" I think is the question

smells like a shop window

All shops are the same darrnyf, get a refund fella, the customer is always right

[darrnyf]

it means lakh (100000)