Progressions 401 for Atlantis

[xxlakis]

GLC i coded it and it looks VERY promising,but i always ended each step on 3 attempts and used my gain to step back to the progression.Well i'll try it your way too and we see how it goes.

[Tomla021]

nothing to do about the mm as perfection should not be altered too much but a nip and tuck is def ok especially in LA.....
just something i noticed when testing icemans theories months ago on roulette and baccarat....might not be a winner as promised but it is very consistantly clumpy as in 3-6 hits in a row a lot

[jarabo002]

Many thanks. Is the code for RX?

[GLC]

Further testing is leading me to believe that this is a decent progression, but you can get caught in the hole and find yourself taking forever to work your way back out.

Most of the time you can win your 20 units fairly quickly.  So really this is the way all long progressions work: we play in the upper 25% of the progression most of the time and the last 75% of the progression is to prevent losing sessions as much as possible.  I think the advantage of a long progression is that as we go through a prolonged losing stretch, our unit sizes increase and when we have the inevitable clump of wins (we hope) we can recover in just a few wins relatively speaking.  We we to take a stop loss at the 25% point in our progression and try to recover the loss starting at 1 unit bets, it would take many, many more wins to recover losses.

That's the trade-off between short progressions and long progressions.  A short example.  We are moving 1 step to the right on a loss and staying at the level until fully recovered.  The progression is  1-2-3-4-5-6-7-8.  Let's say we lose 8 bets and win the next 5 bets, and our stop loss is 35 units.  Since we are at -36 after the 8th loss, we start over at 1 and win 5 bets at 1 unit, we are still down 31 units.

If this is our progression, 1-2-3-4-5-6-7-8-9-10-11-,  after losing 8 bets we are down 36 units.  If we win the next 5 bets that's 9 X 5 = +45 units which fully recovers plus some.

There are other factors to consider when using a long progression, the main one being a large loss when we lose the entire progression.

Pros and cons both ways.

G