Check the last 4 results

[Tomla021]

im thinking more like this: on gr8 --after 4 LLLL play a 4 step marty--at a 2 unit start....so LLLL =-4 , you theoreticly pick up 2 units===- =-2 loss instead of possible 7 unit loss and go back into your gr 8 progression (7 step)...........

[Jeromin]

I was thinking the same thing yesterday and checked some losses in the mentioned 3 Wiesbaden sessions. Again, I used my 3 spins bet selection, not the one presented by GLC. I'm used to it and can check results by hand quite quickly. Not sure how much this bet selection will differ by.

number of losses
                 Sesion 1               Session 2             Sesion 3

1:                 34                         30                          29               
2:                 10                         13                          13
3:                  11                          6                            8
4:                   3                           2                            1
5:                   2                           1                            2
6:                   2                           4                            2
>6*:               1                           2                            1

* 8,7,8 and 11

Jeromin

[Tomla021]

im using the same 3 as you J ,, i think it ends up the same as Glc 4 .....not sure what your results mean?

[Tomla021]

ahhh relooked , now i get it thanks
tom

[Jeromin]

Number of losses meant number of consecutive losses. These are Wiesbaden sesions, over 300 spins some of them. Waiting for a LLLL would be impractical. Betting only on L would incur a maximum of 6 losses ( 2,3,3,2,6,3; session 3); betting on L, LL, LLL with a 1 2 4, with a 2 4 8 recovery ( 3 steps ) would lose twice, twice and once.

Jeromin

[Jeromin]

Ok, here's how the losses ( LLL and up ) come up in 6 recent Weisbaden sessions.

2/X, Table 4

3 3 3 3 3 6 3 3 6 8 5 3 4 3 3 3 4 4 5

3/X Table 3

6 3 3 6 3 6 8 3 4 7 3 6 3 5 3 3

1/X Table 4

3 3 5 6 3 3 3 3 3 3 6 3 11 5 4

2/X Table 3

3 3 3 3 4 5 4 4 3 3 4 5 3 4 3

3/X Table 3

3 3 5 6 3 4 4 3 7 5 4 3 4 3 3 6 3 7 8

3/X Table 1

4 3 3 3 4 4 8 3 3 3 5 6 4 4 3 4

The patterns are short and have potential to be exploited with progression, but it must be noted that these are 300 plus spin sessions, so the average betting oportunity is 1 or 2 per hour. Obviously you get many more opportunities by including LL, provided the progression can manage it.

Jeromin

[Jeromin]

10 steps might be a bit short, actually. 15 spins before checking might be better [...]

That's why I think going up after 15 spins will get you less deep.
Would be great to test it thoroughly.

Jeromin

Well, the minute you get optimistic the wheel dashes your dreams.
Table 4, 03/X, Wiesbaden

15 spins before going up. went al the way to step eleven, lost 258 units.Best recovery was from -120 to -93 at some stage, betting 9 units per spin.

Playing the LLL game as above, I get:

6 3 3 6 3 6 9 3 4 7 3 7.
So a tough session either way, but more manageable with a trigger strategy.
Betting let it ride ( WW to WW ) I get:

7 5 5 3 8 2 5 7 1 10 5 1 0 11 1 1 2 0 5 14 1 12 7 2 4.

All these variations need RX testing, only way to know.

Jeromin

[Tomla021]

i believe your right , but it is amazingly pretty solid even flat betting

[Tomla021]

ive been playing this bet with a regular labby and it seems ok w drawdowns

[GLC]

I've been playing this bet with a regular labby and it seems ok w drawdowns

Tom,  Here's an idea that I had for this system and it's been working pretty darn good.

We will pick a number that's multiplied by 3.  I've been testing with 9.

What that means is that we are trying to win a 2 step parlay.  That means bet 1 and if it wins, we bet 2.  If that wins we are up 4-1=3.  Thus 3 X 3 = 9.

We start betting 1 using the last 4 results to determine our bet selection.  We continue to bet 1 unitl we win, then we let it ride.  If the let it ride bet wins, we drop back to 1.  If we find ourselves at 0  after winning a 2 unit bet, we drop to 1 on the next bet.  If we find ourselves at 0 after winning a 1 unit bet, we bet the 2 units before dropping  back to 1.

If we find ourselves at -9 or higher, we increase to starting our parlay with 2 units.  That means that 2=4 and 4=8 and 8-2 = +6 units on a double parlay win.

Since we're using 3 as our multiplier, when we get to 6 X 3 = -18 +-9 = -27 we move to starting our parlay bet with 3 units.  Thus 3= 6; 6=12-3=+9 on a win.

Stay at a level until you recover all previous losses.

If you want more of a grinder, you can do the progression +1-1 style meaning that if you win enough at a level, you can drop back just 1 level and play there until you win at that level etc...  The problem with this method is that even though it keeps the bet lower, you can get stuck in the hole for a long time trying to claw your way out.

Or, for more safety, you can play it with 3 step parlay instead of a 2 step.  A 3 step parlay nets us 7 units for each triple win.  So 1=2=4=8-1=7 or 3=6=12=24-3=21 etc...  You stay at each level longer, but you have to win 3 times in a row to make any money.

The following is for a 2 step parlay.

Base bet        Move to next level
                    if this much down
1                          -9
2                          -18+-9=-27
3                          -27+-27=-54
4                          -54+-36=-90
5                          -90+-45=-135
etc.....

P.S.  You can play this at the 1st level only.  Or at levels 1 & 2 only.  Or at levels 1,2 & 3 only.  You decide.

Try it and see what you think.

GLC

[GLC]

  I just took it for another test drive and it ran off the cliff.  When it starts heading south, it can keep going with a vengeance.

Can't recommend the bet progression unless I was just having a really horrible series.

[Tomla021]

its very consistant as far as getting a back to back win---3 in a row can be a struggle