• Welcome to #1 Roulette Forum & Message Board | www.RouletteForum.cc.

News:

Almost every system has been tested many times before. Start by learning what we already know doesn't work, and why.

Main Menu
Popular pages:

Roulette System

The Roulette Systems That Really Work

Roulette Computers

Hidden Electronics That Predict Spins

Roulette Strategy

Why Roulette Betting Strategies Lose

Roulette System

The Honest Live Online Roulette Casinos

Even Money Bets - Magical Nine!

Started by ego, Sep 27, 03:21 AM 2011

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

ego

 
1. You use the previous three.
2. If the first outcome is the same as the first outcome with your previous three - you play opposite twice.
3. If the first outcome is the opposite as the first outcome with your previous three - you play same twice.
4. You only play after two loses has appear - you only attack twice.
5. If two loses you wait for a new trigger/sequence.
6. Feel free to use any progression you like.

WWWWLWLWWLWWWLWWWWWW LL LWLW  :o  300 trails ...
Denial of gamblers fallacy is usually seen in people who has Roulette as last option for a way to wealth, debt covering and a independent lifestyle.  Next step is pretty ugly-
AP - It's not that it can't be done, but rather people don't really have a clue as to the level of fanaticism and outright obsession that it takes to be successful, let alone get to the level where you can take money out of the casinos on a regular basis. Out of 1,000 people that earnestly try, maybe only one will make it.

Jeromin

Just a couple of clarifications:
You only play after 2 lossess. but if you then get a W, do you wait for another trigger, or do you continue with the next set of 3?
Do you play 1-2, 1 and stop or 1-1? Because if you attack twice flat, you'd have a lot of "draws".

Thanks

Jeromin
The better the gambler, the worse the man.  Publilius Syrus

ego

 
Well i run some more trails and it is not working - i once got four loses in a row - that was not the main idea ...
I reacon play oppisite toward previos three after fictive win still is the best. I will post some more clear rules and illustration towards this kind of betting.
Denial of gamblers fallacy is usually seen in people who has Roulette as last option for a way to wealth, debt covering and a independent lifestyle.  Next step is pretty ugly-
AP - It's not that it can't be done, but rather people don't really have a clue as to the level of fanaticism and outright obsession that it takes to be successful, let alone get to the level where you can take money out of the casinos on a regular basis. Out of 1,000 people that earnestly try, maybe only one will make it.

catalyst

Quote from: ego on Sep 27, 06:27 AM 2011

Well i run some more trails and it is not working - i once got four loses in a row - that was not the main idea ...
I reacon play oppisite toward previos three after fictive win still is the best. I will post some more clear rules and illustration towards this kind of betting.

dear ego
will this system work for flatbetting?
please clarify the rules.
thanks
catalyst

Nasio

Quote from: ego on Sep 27, 03:21 AM 2011

1. You use the previous three.
2. If the first outcome is the same as the first outcome with your previous three - you play opposite twice.
3. If the first outcome is the opposite as the first outcome with your previous three - you play same twice.
4. You only play after two loses has appear - you only attack twice.
5. If two loses you wait for a new trigger/sequence.
6. Feel free to use any progression you like.

WWWWLWLWWLWWWLWWWWWW LL LWLW  :o  300 trails ...
You need around 1000 actual outcomes/results to have a good idea of how a system plays. Forget the number of spins or trails as it's misleading.

Your idea is worth a look though.

-