Imbalance Combination bets(flat betting)

[RouletteExplorer]

I beliave the best way is to play the session until we are + or until a loss stop(maybe 50 chips is ok)

until now I have played with this way 12 sessions and all came in profit.
Worst down -19
longest spin till a new profit 52

I would like to be tested like this and if it will fail then we can speak about other ways.
Maybe the Restart tracking thing after a + is the key...because we are trapping new imbalances

[nitrix]

don't go too far away from statistic average

@iggiv: It should be a basic rule for any systems posted

I'm glad you and I got the same thinking about this tho

[RouletteExplorer]

nitrix or iggiv can you please xplin to me what do u mean by this? ---->don't go too far away from statistic average

Thanks

[iggiv]

nitrix or iggiv can you please xplin to me what do u mean by this? ---->don't go too far away from statistic average

Thanks

simple. average dozens hits once in 3 spins. average number hits once in 37 (38 spins). Etc.

so when u go beyond this u bet a sleeper. which is not what u want

[RouletteExplorer]

Yes I also agree on that...

Update on the system:
After a lots of tests I have found out that the best stop loss is -30 chips.

So BR is 30 chips.
After any + we are finishing the session and we are tracking from the start.

[RouletteExplorer]

Tests with -30 or ANY + .

1)-30 IN 62 SPINS
2)+1  IN 6 SPINS
3)+3  IN 8 SPINS
4)+1  IN 1 SPINS
5)+2  IN 6 SPINS
6)+4  IN 27 SPINS
7)+3  IN 1 SPINS
8 )+3 IN  49 SPINS
9)+1  IN 1 SPINS
10)+3 IN 6 SPINS
11)+1 IN 34 SPINS
12)+1 IN 1 SPIN
13)-30 IN  21 SPINS

RESULTS = -37 CHIPS.

The system with those rules of stop-loss and end session in every new + is not working.

Any ideas?

[iggiv]

maybe reduce your session stop loss. your win goal could be small, but the stop loss should not be too big either. it should be proportional. for example win goal 10-20%, stop loss 20-50 %, no more than this. U make 1 unit, and  u r ok with it, but u bet till u lose 30 units. that's not good.

[RouletteExplorer]

Yes this was my thought too iggiv and you are right ofcource BUT I don t know if this will also make it win....
But I think its gonna be better with a smaller stop loss.
mayby around 15 chips.

[iggiv]

it's a "percentage game". those are not my words, rather Bret Morton's. u gotta have very strict rules and stick to them. if your session  win goal is only 1 unit, 15 units stop loss not good! it should not be more than 5 units.

[Jeromin]

We can t start betting on the blacks for the balance to come because there is a possibilitu that in the 1000 spins before , the Blacks were 700 and the reds were 300(excluding the zero for easier example)....so the reds can still be hitting more in the next 200 spins because they need the balance....

I don't think such long term large imbalances happen. Maybe somebody could test it with large samples, but I looked at over fifty sessions on Wiesbaden; it's easy because they give you the EC summary and sessions go on for some 300 spins most of the time. The differentials always lie at 43/57 to 48/52 ( excluding 0 ). Within each sessions there's always a point where the non dominant EC approaches or even passes the 50% point. At Bet365 there are stats available for the last 150 spins on some wheels. Again, rarely goes below 43/57 for EC. When it does, you come back an hour later and chances are it has balanced somewhat.

Jeromin

[Drazen]

My friends, imbalance is the key. But it should be observed as short sequence imbalance... It can give you good point to start the attack. When you hit your target, you stop and waiting for another chance. Applying this and observing several methods at the same time, you are getting your fabulous so called H G. I KNOW. End of discussion for me.


Regards


Drazen

[woods101]

Quote from RouletteExplorer:

"We can t start betting on the blacks for the balance to come because there is a possibilitu that in the 1000 spins before , the Blacks were 700 and the reds were 300(excluding the zero for easier example)....so the reds can still be hitting more in the next 200 spins because they need the balance...."

And the 1800 spins before that there were another 1500 blacks and 300 reds, and before that another 3000 reds and 1000 blacks possibly.
The truth is that most of the time we just don't know what happened 5000 spins ago let alone 10,000 or 50,000, therefore any retrospective view is of little use. It is better to observe what spins are about to happen and make a judgement on them as they come there and then. The zero point or starting point of measurement is the point at which you sit down and start to observe. As always all past events are irrelevant. By default all future results are the opposite.

Woods