My final answer is!!!

[speed]

I have read this topic and with all due respect to all I have to say that most of this is pure nonsense associated with gambling fallacy. If anyone thinks otherwise please let me correct in the following conclusions and give me proof that I'm wrong;

-in long run there is no difference in play every day 50 spins or 1000 spins (because we can't know when we get bad series and before that leave the table (this does not apply to people who can see the future  )

-in long run on losing system stop-loss and win can't help ( if u don't agree try to test some losing system with stop-loss and without, u will see, both are losing)

-in long run there are no better losing and worse losing systems, all is same, if u bet same unit, all get loss  approximately of 2.7% ( if some think that some system is beter then his system need to neutralize the advantage of house least for a 0.5 percent on 3 milion or more spins)

-in long run, you can know and combine 100 outside and 100 inside bet systems but there no difference u got same house advantage of 2,7% and 1.5% on outside bet for french roulette because u don't know when to change system and play another (this does not apply to people who can see the future  )

I know some of you think I have experience playing roulette  40 years and I can predict when to stop and leave the casino.. This is one of the largest gambling misconceptions, because roulette
is random in 95% cases!

For example why sports betting has the advantage of house7-15 percent and roulette 2.7? This is because on sport betting  players with knowledge and experience can affect and reduce the house advantage, while at the roulette it is hard to happen because we can not affect on the ball and the roulette wheel. I hope some understand this facts.


speed

[ego]

I have read this topic and with all due respect to all I have to say that most of this is pure nonsense associated with gambling fallacy. If anyone thinks otherwise please let me correct in the following conclusions and give me proof that I'm wrong;

-in long run there is no difference in play every day 50 spins or 1000 spins (because we can't know when we get bad series and before that leave the table (this does not apply to people who can see the future  )

-in long run on losing system stop-loss and win can't help ( if u don't agree try to test some losing system with stop-loss and without, u will see, both are losing)

-in long run there are no better losing and worse losing systems, all is same, if u bet same unit, all get loss  approximately of 2.7% ( if some think that some system is beter then his system need to neutralize the advantage of house least for a 0.5 percent on 3 milion or more spins)

-in long run, you can know and combine 100 outside and 100 inside bet systems but there no difference u got same house advantage of 2,7% and 1.5% on outside bet for french roulette because u don't know when to change system and play another (this does not apply to people who can see the future  )

I know some of you think I have experience playing roulette  40 years and I can predict when to stop and leave the casino.. This is one of the largest gambling misconceptions, because roulette
is random in 95% cases!

For example why sports betting has the advantage of house7-15 percent and roulette 2.7? This is because on sport betting  players with knowledge and experience can affect and reduce the house advantage, while at the roulette it is hard to happen because we can not affect on the ball and the roulette wheel. I hope some understand this facts.


speed

I can just glance at the wheel and reduce the house edge - not so difficult.

[speed]

I can just glance at the wheel and reduce the house edge - not so difficult.

And I also.. But not here talking about VB, DS and BIAS, this up only applies to roulette mathematical systems.