• Welcome to #1 Roulette Forum & Message Board | www.RouletteForum.cc.

News:

Progression bets are nothing more than different size bets on different spins. You could get lucky and win big, or unlucky and lose even more.

Main Menu
Popular pages:

Roulette System

The Roulette Systems That Really Work

Roulette Computers

Hidden Electronics That Predict Spins

Roulette Strategy

Why Roulette Betting Strategies Lose

Roulette System

The Honest Live Online Roulette Casinos

Below is test of ten million trials to see when a repeat occurs ...

Started by ego, Oct 25, 04:12 AM 2011

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

birdhands

I think the idea is that 5 numbers will repeat in 8 spins.  Plus the high/low thing, which I don't understand.  It seems to me that if we have 5 high in a row then either the chances are 50/50 that high will hit again or they are in favor of low, since a run of 6 is less likely than a run of 5.


Sam

ego

Quote from: birdhands on Oct 26, 01:36 PM 2011
I think the idea is that 5 numbers will repeat in 8 spins.  Plus the high/low thing, which I don't understand.  It seems to me that if we have 5 high in a row then either the chances are 50/50 that high will hit again or they are in favor of low, since a run of 6 is less likely than a run of 5.


Sam

Sam the idea was that if we get repeats after previous five numbers with no repeat with regularity - then if i would only pick high/low numbers using previous five does should also with same regularity also get one repeat - then i ride two horses regarding probability - as one as follow the the previous five high or low to become a serie of 6789 witch is as you state a 50/50 situation - but we have one extra parameter in our favour - repeats appears at 6789 with regularity and is one reason why some one would not play against as follow the previous five high low with no repeats should be a better option.

The question is witch attack window is best - 3 or 4 attempts.
Let me illustrate this with out using high/low and just use regular numbers with previos five.
Today's file from random org ...

33
0
21
27
22 Previos five numbers with no repeat

6
28
11
7  Attack four times no repeat

7
35
23
10
5 Previos five numbers with no repeat

25
22
23 Attack three time one repeat one win

21
29
1
27
32 Previos five numbers with no repeat

23
9
15
27 Attack four times one repeat one win

6
10
22
25
35 Previos five numbers with no repeat

7
3
22 Attack three times one repeat one win

Now it should not be any difference if i add one extra parameter and only clustering high/low numbers with previos five with no repeats - witch then should apper with same regularity and give us two hourses to ride as we would only play high/low as previos five with no repeats.
Is like playing even money bets using two parameters of probabiltiy.

7 attacks with previos high/low had 3 with repeats among the next 4 attempts for attack.
6 won and one loss.

25
22
23
21
29 Previos five high numbers with no repeat

1 Low Loss
27 High Won
32
23 Repeat

8
9
4
18
6 Previos five low numbers with no repeat

21 High Loss
11 Low Won
7
22

13
4
14
5
10 previos

27
34
30
27

2
16
6
13
12 previos

22
12 repeat won
24
6 repeat

4
2
1
8
9 previos

35
25
21
12 won

18
1
15
3
12

8 won
23
19
15 repeat

32
36
35
22
34 previos

4
30 won
14
17

Maybe this that i show is not the ultimate way using two parameters - but i find it intressting  :twisted:
Denial of gamblers fallacy is usually seen in people who has Roulette as last option for a way to wealth, debt covering and a independent lifestyle.  Next step is pretty ugly-
AP - It's not that it can't be done, but rather people don't really have a clue as to the level of fanaticism and outright obsession that it takes to be successful, let alone get to the level where you can take money out of the casinos on a regular basis. Out of 1,000 people that earnestly try, maybe only one will make it.

-