Random.org vs actuals

[Turner]

Sorry, but Im getting carried away with this.
Just been getting some numbers from Random.org and to quicken things up I selected integers at 3 per selection .
I felt each group of 3 were disjointed so I did 40 numbers so it was a nice line. It looks like a marque.

why do I feel more comfortable seeing it in a line of 40 than 3 at a time. They are completly individual random numbers that have no idea about the last or the next.

Is this a clue to bias against actuals vs random.org?

[Skakus]

Skakus,

Could you expand on this? not sure I understand what you mean but it sounds interesting. If after every spin you generate a new wheel order, then how do you know which sections are 'hot'?

A short example might help. 

Hey, sorry for the slow response, I've been busy with life.

You would need a circle numbered 0-36 around the perimeter then inside those numbers would be a second circle of numbers that changed after each spin. This way you would always know what section is hitting but never know what the numbers might be before each spin.


This is just another form of random number generating and I’m certain you would get similar results betting hot sections on the basic French wheel as you would betting hot sections on the blarney Skakus wheel.

In my estimation it would prove the wheel/number relationship is as random as the number streams.

You could do it with red and black too. A different red/black mix around the wheel after every spin should make no difference to the results.

So for the purposes of roulette random.org numbers are as good as any, in my opinion.