• Welcome to #1 Roulette Forum & Message Board | www.RouletteForum.cc.

News:

Every system can win in the short-term. It just depends on the spins you play.

Main Menu
Popular pages:

Roulette System

The Roulette Systems That Really Work

Roulette Computers

Hidden Electronics That Predict Spins

Roulette Strategy

Why Roulette Betting Strategies Lose

Roulette System

The Honest Live Online Roulette Casinos

Kimo Li's Matrix - The Eclipse

Started by waterbenjamin, Aug 14, 02:26 AM 2010

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

albertojonas


iggiv

Waterbenjamin gave some good food for thoughts and ideas here. I can't brag I found a solution on a long run, but on short runs different matrix approaches can give you good results.

all you have to do is to draw a matrix (maybe even a few with different number order), get see-through holder and mark/analyze hits. you can check {hit (once or twice) pies/stars} intersections, you can check {unhit p/s} intersections, you can wait for different number of spins, you can even try betting pies or stars. But you need some time to practice and analyze it.

in roulette every fixed strategy fails on a long run, but you can try multiple approaches/patterns/matrices. you can also use other Kimo Li's ideas like nuke and bow together with matrix. It is impossible to give here fixed solution to beat a roulette I think. but if you find a few multiple approaches for yourself you may be lucky (or successful?).

I myself did not win any considerable money with matrix yet, but analyzed some patterns and came to conclusion that multiple approaches with matrix to roulette may be useful.
So having Waterbenjamin's results here helps and encourages.

but for God's sake don't :
don't run to casino with big cash right away after series of results like WaterBenjamin's
don't try long progressions with big dawndraw.

Remember it took Kimo Li long long years to come up with what he did

chrisbis

Here-here to that.

Im studying the Pie's and the Stars too.

(Im am resisting the urge to crack a joke about what I have just said,
for the sake of my sanitificationally-well-being.

Now check that will U, Mr Spell checker!!

There's more to the Matrix ideas than first meets the Pixel Eye!

GLC

Thanks a lot guys.

Replys #25-28 are the funniest sequence I've read/seen in a long time.

I'm still laughing.

Can we elaborate a little more?

;D ::) ;D :lol:

George
In my case it doesn't matter.  I'm both!

albalaha

Dear All,
             I have read Kimo's both books. Nothing special and works averagely only with wins and losses. Good only theoratically

albertojonas

Quote from: albalaha on Nov 14, 10:09 PM 2010
Dear All,
             I have read Kimo's both books. Nothing special and works averagely only with wins and losses. Good only theoratically

what system do you applied?
There are no systems suggested in those books...  ??? :question:

albalaha

It is all about system. Have a look again. Clover system, global star system, pendulum system and many more.

JA

Hi guys,
I have Kimo's book Predict the Exact Number.
Since I have spent so many hours testing other roulette systems which have failed miserably, is there a point in investing time learning Kimo's strategies?

Can someone advise that they are consistently winning at roulette using Kimo's strategies?
My fear is that i will be wasting my time again on something that breaks down in the long runs. . thanks for the feedback.

I notice waterbenjamin has lots of screen shots. . .

Twisteruk

Quote from: JA on Dec 08, 02:56 AM 2010

I notice waterbenjamin has lots of screen shots. . .



Yes. Look at those screen shots.

As Ive posted before in this Thread, look at the chips down on the table. Look at their value on the winning number then look the amout they are being paid out....


72 on the winning number ??

Hmmmmmmmmnnnnn  :yawn:
Its Set In Stone =)

chrisbis

Paul.
His winnings, would be 72 minus the 8 bet chips on the table= 64

Must be the way the casino annouces the actual winnings R.O.I style.

The 72 should really be 70 (at 35:1 ratio), but they must add back the stake money.

Strange it is mate.

Twisteruk

Quote from: chrisbis on Dec 08, 03:33 AM 2010
Paul.
His winnings, would be 72 minus the 8 bet chips on the table= 64

Must be the way the casino annouces the actual winnings R.O.I style.

The 72 should really be 70 (at 35:1 ratio), but they must add back the stake money.

Strange it is mate.


Thats not how I saw it  ???


On his Screenshots he has 72 chips on the winning number but only 2 chips on the other 3 losin numbers


Or maybe I misunderstood what Im seeing  :-\
Its Set In Stone =)

weddings

Quote from: Twisteruk on Dec 08, 03:38 AM 2010

that's not how I saw it  ???


On his Screenshots he has 72 chips on the winning number but only 2 chips on the other 3 losing numbers


Or maybe I misunderstood what I'm seeing  :-\

Hey twister you have misunderstood, he bets 2 units per number and when a number wins in that casino, the number will flash showing the amount he won on that number. For 2 units he won 72 units. Hope it makes things clear.
-----

Twisteruk

Quote from: weddings on Dec 08, 03:51 AM 2010
Hey twister you have misunderstood, he bets 2 units per number and when a number wins in that casino, the number will flash showing the amount he won on that number. For 2 units he won 72 units. Hope it makes things clear.

Ah most helpful weddings, thank you  :)

I didnt realise that   :thumbsup:
Its Set In Stone =)

JA

Thanks Guys. . .
so just to be crystal clear, it seems from your posts that it is worthwhile looking into Kimo Li's book?
I will assume this until anyone else tells me otherwise.
I am in between contracts and won't be working till January or so.
I plan to start reviewing his material very very soon.
Simply yell out is you feel its a total waste of time. . . anyways, looks like it can be worthwhile. . . rest assured i will report any great results should i find one.
Cheers,

Jose

Compa

All i can say is that Kimo Li's material is the Holy Grail. If You study it carefully and know how to apply it.

Cheers!

-