Dynamic Differential Betting

[marivo]

Hello

It does not work. It won't load.

Regards

It works. It goes down very consistently. Does it mean we should play it opposite?

[jarabo002]

It works. It goes down very consistently. Does it mean we should play it opposite?

Well, I recommend to play in the short run, never in the long run.

For example:

stop-win:  5 units
Stop-loos: 20 units

[Colbster]

You can't play with those limits or this concept is pointless.  The only way for this to work is to let the trend in one direction or the other correct itself.  According to the post that Boatran put, he is swapping at level 5.  I'm ok, but not thrilled, with that change.  I prefer level 10 for the swap because it gives you a ton of time for the chopping to help you gain profits at the lower levels to offset whatever losses you might have in those sessions that do go south.  A stop loss that low doesn't allow you to work up the progression anywhere near enough to swap with any sort of recovery time.  A stop loss of 20 is completely antithetical to my approach and cannot/will not work.

[eureka]

Hello

In my LAST VERSION of the RX code I posted, the swap is at ten... It plays strictly conforming to the original rules. You can compare with the Excel tracker.

[marivo]

Hello

In my LAST VERSION of the RX code I posted, the swap is at ten... It plays strictly conforming to the original rules. You can compare with the Excel tracker.

Did you see the chart i posted?

[eureka]

It works. It goes down very consistently. Does it mean we should play it opposite?

I have tried with the opposite. It goes down as well.

My advice is that you learn RX coding to be able to make the tweaks you want...

Or request my coding skills into RX for a particular system, as I can't code all the systems of the forum (cf Sniper's request).

[marivo]

I have tried with the opposite. It goes down as well.

If you bet on EC as it is the case in this system and if you bet according to RX code suggestion and the chart goes down consistently, isn't it logical it would go up if you bet the opposite what RX code is suggesting? Or i don't understand what this chart is actually showing...

[Robeenhuut]

If you bet on EC as it is the case in this system and if you bet according to RX code suggestion and the chart goes down consistently, isn't it logical it would go up if you bet the opposite what RX code is suggesting? Or i don't understand what this chart is actually showing...

It shows you that like most of the systems posted here its long time loser.  But if you incorporate win goal and stop loss smartly you have a shot at making some profit long term.
Software testing will tell you only part of the story.
For me its just another tool.  Nothing will replace pen and paper because some dynamic systems can not be coded period.  But it takes lots of time and most people are not willing to do it.

Regards

[Colbster]

I wonder if we can apply the same scheme to dozens or columns for instance.
What would it look like then ?

You could use a Win/Loss differential bet on the dozens or columns, I suppose.  You would have to code the spreadsheet to move up after 2 losses and down 1 on a single win.  Then, the various bets would have to be bet differentially against one another.  Fascinating idea, but it would take some might complex rules.