GLC,which part of system is not clear?? In thread Drazen's all beautifully written and I strongly hold that, just depends how much bank you have and what is the size of chips.
Hope You read the thread carefully and and finally play at the tables!! 
Niksa
I have been looking at it again. There's quite a lot of reading to do all over again. As I was reading, I had the thought that separating the numbers by dozens doesn't really make that much difference since we bet on the single numbers. Why not just take the numbers that haven't hit in the 37 spins and divide them into 3 groups as evenly as possible to keep our progressions equal even if it meant having 4 or 5 groups with 4 or 5 progression lines.
If we had the bank roll we could bet each number individually with a separate bank roll. That means that we would have to have about 900 units for as many numbers as we are willing to bet at one time. Let's say we track until we have 12 unhit numbers. Then we start betting all 12 numbers at 1 unit each with their own progression line. As soon as we have a set number of hits, say 6, we take our winnings and re-track. We could say as soon as we reach a certain win target amount or a certain number of hits we re-track and reset everything to 1.
I know, Drazen_cro said many times that there are a lot of ways to apply this idea and he's right.
A 5000 unit bank is a pretty substantial bank roll. I've often thought that a 5,000 unit bank roll should be a benchmark to test all systems with. In other words, if you can win on one system with a 5,000 unit bank, how many other systems might be viable when played with a 5,000 unit bank? That way, when someone posts a system it can be ranked next to other systems because they are all graded against the same parameters.
Okay, enough comments. I know this is changing this topic, so if you think all this is verbiage is distracting from your original intention for this topic, please delete this.
GLC
