• Welcome to #1 Roulette Forum & Message Board | www.RouletteForum.cc.

News:

WARNING: Forums often contain bad advice & systems that aren't properly tested. Do NOT believe everything. Read these links: The Facts About What Works & Why | How To Proplerly Test Systems | The Top 5 Proven Systems | Best Honest Online Casinos

Main Menu
Popular pages:

Roulette System

The Roulette Systems That Really Work

Roulette Computers

Hidden Electronics That Predict Spins

Roulette Strategy

Why Roulette Betting Strategies Lose

Roulette System

The Honest Live Online Roulette Casinos

What does a Grail look like?

Started by Proofreaders2000, Feb 27, 09:49 AM 2012

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Proofreaders2000

I'm think the Grail looks like: chips on one number, should hit within 10 spins 90% of the time.

Any thoughts on this?

ego


I believe if some one like Kim Larsen understand how to capture favorites or repeaters or imbalance on regular basis using some kind of periodic present state - you would have the Grail.

Assumptions with the following statement above is that why would Kim Larsen disappear with out any way to find any material about him or buy hes book.
Conclusion is that eitherway so was he as successfully as the storeys goes or he end up poor where all hes methods would be regarding as a joke or him as clown.
Denial of gamblers fallacy is usually seen in people who has Roulette as last option for a way to wealth, debt covering and a independent lifestyle.  Next step is pretty ugly-
AP - It's not that it can't be done, but rather people don't really have a clue as to the level of fanaticism and outright obsession that it takes to be successful, let alone get to the level where you can take money out of the casinos on a regular basis. Out of 1,000 people that earnestly try, maybe only one will make it.

maestro

ego what are stories about this kim larsen never heard of him...can you please tell as..or can i read somewhere...thanks :thumbsup:
Law of the sixth...<when you play roulette there will always be a moron tells you that you will lose to the house edge>

ego

Quote from: maestro on Feb 27, 01:08 PM 2012
ego what are stories about this kim larsen never heard of him...can you please tell as..or can i read somewhere...thanks :thumbsup:

Search Kim Larsen and Roulette - all you will get is how he turn a small amount of money to 5k during a few hours witch was shown on TV and stories that he had developed hes own chaos theory witch seem to work out pretty good.
Denial of gamblers fallacy is usually seen in people who has Roulette as last option for a way to wealth, debt covering and a independent lifestyle.  Next step is pretty ugly-
AP - It's not that it can't be done, but rather people don't really have a clue as to the level of fanaticism and outright obsession that it takes to be successful, let alone get to the level where you can take money out of the casinos on a regular basis. Out of 1,000 people that earnestly try, maybe only one will make it.

soggett

If you mean the Holy grail, it should look something like this:



:D
Joke aside

Shouldn't the grail win every bet you make? you bet on number 1 it hits, you bet on high it hits, you bet on street 6 it hits...
I imagine it that way, thats why it does not exist, there are only bad, good and better systems
Thats what I think
To beat the game you first have to realise you can't beat the game - then comes the hard part

superman

QuoteI imagine it that way, that's why it does not exist

LOL you would be banned the same day if you had that.

The grail in my opinion is when you win more than you lose in every session, the odds are more in your favour, you hit more than 50% of the time, that's all we need, 3 to 5% better than we are at now.
There's only one way forward, follow random, don't fight with it!

Ignore a thread/topic that mentions 'stop loss', 'virtual loss' and also when a list is provided of a progression, mechanical does NOT work!

frost

a 'grail' should win every session. not every bet. that is impossible.

soggett

Quote from: superman on Feb 29, 03:51 AM 2012

LoL you would be banned the same day if you had that.

The grail in my opinion is when you win more than you lose in every session, the odds are more in your favour, you hit more than 50% of the time, that's all we need, 3 to 5% better than we are at now.

Yes,
imagine, You just sit down, place a max limit bet on whatever and you're done for today  :)

I agree with you, as long as you win more than you lose you have a winner, call it a grail or whatever you want

What if you have a system that uses a progression and always ends the session in plus?how would that be considered? Like a 35 step progression on a dozen? (that's just for an example - I know the table limits, bankroll, etc but I can't think of anything else at the moment ;D )
You lose and lose but when you win you are in plus - thus every session is positive, no negative sessions
Would that be a grail?
Like frost said - win every session and not every bet


P.S.
If you have something like that feel free to PM me  :D :D
To beat the game you first have to realise you can't beat the game - then comes the hard part

Tamino

Sometimes it is better to forgo a win than to create a loss. ( quote by C. Kaisan  )

Nathan Detroit

niksa

Quote from: soggett on Feb 29, 03:09 PM 2012



What if you have a system that uses a progression and always ends the session in plus?how would that be considered? Like a 35 step progression on a dozen? (that's just for an example - I know the table limits, bankroll, etc but I can't think of anything else at the moment ;D )
You lose and lose but when you win you are in plus - thus every session is positive, no negative sessions


Uh,that looks like famous,this as I have seen somewhere?? lol  :twisted:

Steve

"The only way to beat roulette is by increasing the accuracy of predictions"
Roulettephysics.com ← Professional roulette tips
Roulette-computers.com ← Hidden electronics that predicts the winning number
Roulettephysics.com/roulette-strategy ← Why most systems lose

Steve

Seriously though, that is pretty much the answer to your question. Everything exists as a result of harmonic vibrations / waves. Understand and tracking the relationship between them is what you want. See :.genuinewinner.com/waves.pdf

But there are plenty methods to beat roulette that dont require you to understand how the primordial universe works.
"The only way to beat roulette is by increasing the accuracy of predictions"
Roulettephysics.com ← Professional roulette tips
Roulette-computers.com ← Hidden electronics that predicts the winning number
Roulettephysics.com/roulette-strategy ← Why most systems lose

GARNabby

It's as hard to figure out as it is self-evident afterward.  Ie, the faster you could realize that it's the solution, the longer it would take for you to figure it out.

Quote from: Steve on Feb 29, 05:26 PM 2012
Everything exists as a result of harmonic vibrations / waves. Understand[ing] and tracking the relationship between them [those] is what you [are] want[ing]. See :.genuinewinner.com/waves.pdf
What of also the basic particle-state of nature?  The problem with String Theory is that by the time every thing, including the particles, has been mathematically described in terms of only the waves, every thing which was knowable will have already became known.  It's the theory which isn't meant to be any more than a theory, there's no way to test any of it out in practice... certainly not in the overall sense, by which the thing could confirm itself.

Quote from: Steve on Feb 29, 05:26 PM 2012
But there are plenty methods to beat roulette that don't require you to understand how the primordial universe works.
Every player is beating the game.  Why else would each continue to play?  What must change is their definition of "a beating".

Iggy

QuoteBut there are plenty of methods to beat roulette.

PLEASE name one. I have never found one yet ...............

iggy

frost

he has got a point (steve). i think we over complicate roulette and so we find it even more difficult to win.


i went to the casino the other day. first time as i used to play on-line. i was amazed to see they actually display percentages on the marquee.


i made 6 bets. i lost 2. the only reason i lost two was cos i was getting carried away (i was getting excited cos i was winning. forgot to remain calm)


that's one method you could use.


if your interested i was only playing outside bets. minimum bet 5 units. I started 10. I left with 50.


I think Steve once said the best way to win  a roulette is to increase the accuracy of your bets.


trust me. he was right.

-