Can anyone code for betvoyager?

[albalaha]

Buddy twisteruk,
            There is a fact which gamblers either forget or do not know. The basic meaning of RANDOM is unorganised and unrelated to previous results. Always keep in mind that it is never necessary that all numbers will appear equally over any number of spins, be it 100 or 1000 or even one million. There is absolutely no rule, no law and no order in which number will be generated. Even if you bet 36 numbers in every spin, there will be a time when 1 spare number will come out against you. But when will it come, can not be said. This law of third, law of averages etc. are fake concepts. If there exists a true concept, is my LAW OF UNEVEN DISTRIBUTION   which says each and every number of roulette shall appear sooner or later but not evenly, sometimes certain numbers will override others and and sometimes some numbers become sleeper. Never test genuineness of any random number generator this way. A manipulated RNG can generated your anti numbers whenever required, but betvoyager is a nice casino.

[Fripper]

Twisteruk, this looks very weird. It should go up and down but not so much down..

[Bayes]

Well, if you were betting 18 numbers per spin that's only an offset of 22 (ie; you lost 22 bets, 22 x 18 = 396u). That isn't anything unlikely over 1000 spins (or even less), so I wouldn't be too quick to accuse BV of anything fishy.

[Twisteruk]

Oh, ok guys 

Thanx for clearing that up 

[Fripper]

Yes you are right Bayes, now when I gave it a thought.

[Anima-t3d]

Twisteruk do the same test but cover everything except 11 black...
Besides you can also just bet $0.01 

[Twisteruk]

Twisteruk do the same test but cover everything except 11 black...
Besides you can also just bet $0.01  

Yes, thanks I know  

I made a mistake with my reply to Bayes  

I was betting 0.10 Stake (was thinking of a different Casino)



But I've made this thread go so far Off Topic I didnt want to add to that further....

[albalaha]

This result of yours is very normal. Even if u get abnormal results, you just cant blame an RNG, there is absolutely no predefined rule for number generation and any number can appear or turn sleeper for any number of time. There is absolutely no rule.

[Twisteruk]

This result of yours is very normal. Even if you get abnormal results, you just can't blame an RNG, there is absolutely no predefined rule for number generation and any number can appear or turn sleeper for any number of time. There is absolutely no rule.

True.

I just didnt expect to lose the whole Ã,£100 in 1000 Spins at Ã,£1.80 a Spin.....

I deposited Ã,£100

My Unit stake was .10p on 18 numbers so Ã,£1.80 a Spin

This gave me almost 56 Losin Spins to absorb

Ã,£100/Ã,£1.80 a Spin = 55.55


Oh well, live and learn as they say.....

[albalaha]

Let bygones be bygones. Never do such testings with real money. Had earning from roulette been so easy, it would have become a money minting machine. Leave this offtopic discussion and think of some creative ways to earn from no zero roulette.

[Twisteruk]

That's just it, I wasn't out to earn. I wanted to see if it would "break even"


Like you imply, its done now.


JUST for the Record, I HATE RNG and this was a one off.....NEVER to be repeated !