37 back to basics

[6th-sense]

i know crystal....i would like to give you one more if you want or anyone who wants it ..with the base to work from..based on comment 1503 by alexlaf

[6th-sense]

i would also want dilshods permission to share some stuff....i think it goes in conjunction with the very basic stuff...

[Chrono]

Hey 6th - I did some investigating, I'm still working through the thread. You said somewhere around page 50 or 30 maybe that unhits will always equal the number of repeats by the end of the cycle. I am not finding that to be accurate. Perhaps a misunderstanding on my part?

Here's the ratios I've come up with for roughly 4000 cycles.

0.5882, 0.625, 0.75, 0.6923, 0.75, 0.7059, 0.75, 0.75, 0.7692, 0.6429, 0.7647

Obviously that's just a small sample. The mean ratio is 0.73.

What I am doing is excluding all the numbers that hit only once, and taking the count of the rest of the repeaters (so 2+) and dividing that against the missing numbers from that cycle. That was my understanding of what you had said.

Am I incorrect?

Here's the code(python), I don't see any problems with it.

repeaters_v_unhit = []
repeaters_v_unhit_ratios = []
for cycle in cycles_data:
    counts = Counter(Counter(cycle).values())
    missing = set(tableNumbers) - set(cycle)
    del counts[1]
    repeaters_v_unhit.append((sum(counts.values()), len(missing)))

for repeaters, unhit in repeaters_v_unhit:
    repeaters_v_unhit_ratios.append(round(repeaters/unhit, 4))

print(repeaters_v_unhit_ratios)

[d80]

i know crystal....i would like to give you one more if you want or anyone who wants it ..with the base to work from..based on comment 1503 by alexlaf

6TH Share more info please.

[MoneyT101]

well its 6 years ago and the anniversary of this thread...

Happy Anniversary 🎉🎈

[TRD]

I thought this forum has turned into a desert .. but seems the team is converging again.

[alexlaf]

6-th if for example with Lines our max is 6 spins is there a guarantee to catch  the win within this finite sett main + derived ?

[Tipman]

i jump in this topic every year or so to see whats been mentioned. I do alot of football betting and ive come across so many people who make a loss football betting. Some create this seperate fantasy life where they pretend they make a living and have cracked football betting.

Theres always one way to spot these fakers. ASK FOR A PROFIT AND LOSS SCREENSHOT OVER 12 MONTHS.

6th sense started this topic with a method of making a living from the bookies, skip to page 10 and that method has now changed, skip to page 20 and the method has changed again, skip to page 30 and the method has changed again. ask yourself this, if this "method" was a winner why has it been adapted so many times....

all these "clues" are given because there is no method, its all to feed an ego of somebody who likes to think they are succesful and 100 pages in to this "method" has fed the ego massively. the "clues" are when the topic starts to die and the ego isnt being fed anymore.

6th you've shared clues, you've shared excel sheets, you've shared tools. This is where i know you will get stumped, SHARE A 12 MONTH PROFIT AND LOSS SCREENSHOT FROM THE CASINO YOU ARE USING.

Everybody wasting their time trying to figure this out you'll notice this request will be ignored OR there will be excuses as to why he cant send a profit and loss screenshot. Theres no harm in sending it, so the avoidance will confirm you are all wasting your time feeding somebodys ego and its time to close this topic.

Until a 12 month profit and loss screenshot from a casino (not an excel sheet) or a 30 day Roulette simulator screenshot  is shown, i urge all of you to stop trying to figure this out.

6th here is your chance to really feed your ego and make me look stupid. I can only think of 1 reason why you wouldnt take that oppurtunity....

[MumboJumbo]

I'm not one of those who would play this, but I believe that it still helped someone, maybe you look too negatively at all that, but you're right, when someone upgrades the system, it means that the system is definitely not good.

[Tipman]

i dont think im negative, ive just spent years in the football/horse racing betting community to know that people who fail to make money, live a fantasy persona on the internet of being succesful to make them feel better about losing.

Everything ive seen in here just gives off huge red flags hence why im skeptical.

Tools shared
Hints shared
Spreadsheets shared
Info shared

Yet ask for a 12 month Profit and loss from the casino and this easily shareable information will be ignored or a list of excuses why it cant be screenshotted and shared.

[TRD]

The way I see it, someone has been more than generous providing readers with insights & working framework ..

It's up to a reader to take upon these pieces of information offered, peer into the insights & most importantly, develop something of their own .. IDK, English would say ropes are shown, now you are on your own to make something on your own that you own, externalize yourself.

But who the fuck are you to think that someone  owes  you anything .. 6th or anyone else.

If you have to satisfy overcoming your doubts, I think you'll get much further by pm-ing the relevant author about the system in question & perhaps, most likely get even more than what you requested.

[6th-sense]

Thanks TRD..as for tipman there are no methods shown of play on page 10...20...30..and as for the bookies I suggest you re read where ever that is...that was my son in law which I stated made the money from arbing...
This thread is a development over the years...not an ego statistical adventure..if it was I would not have shared so much stuff..

I personally think you are frustrated and not a very good tipman when you cannot read properly...you claim to be bookies gambling orientatated footbal. Etc.... yet you are here on a roulette forum ..

TRD has summed it up correctly...do not take his advice to pm though..

And please for the record for every reader point to and explain what betting method I actually shown on page 10. 20. 30...

And I mean actual method with explanations not guesswork you are referring to..

Like to know myself what they actually was

Not what you presume they was