• Welcome to #1 Roulette Forum & Message Board | www.RouletteForum.cc.

News:

Odds and payouts are different things. If either the odds or payouts don't change, then the result is the same - eventual loss.

Main Menu
Popular pages:

Roulette System

The Roulette Systems That Really Work

Roulette Computers

Hidden Electronics That Predict Spins

Roulette Strategy

Why Roulette Betting Strategies Lose

Roulette System

The Honest Live Online Roulette Casinos

Too much good to be true ?

Started by Lulloz, Aug 22, 04:44 PM 2010

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Side B

No you won't because you're likely to make another loss whilst trying to recover. So you'll be doing the opposite of what you wanted to achieve: you'll be making a loss based on $2 units when you're trying to get back to playing with $1 units. That's how the casinos get you!  :(

Anima-t3d

Quote from: Side B on Aug 24, 01:12 PM 2010
No you won't because you're likely to make another loss whilst trying to recover. So you'll be doing the opposite of what you wanted to achieve: you'll be making a loss based on $2 units when you're trying to get back to playing with $1 units. That's how the casinos get you!  :(
Yes that's when you use a normal martingale betting reds. But if you have a proven system that profits for over 2 million spins, wouldn't doubling the bets on a loss lessen the impact of the loss?
E.g. you are betting singles which makes 1000 units every 1000 spins when running good, but occasionally you make a loss of 750 units every 1000 spins, netting 250 for every 1000 spins. Now if you know this 750 unit loss happens 0-5 times every 1000 spins. You'd need about 375 spins to make up the previous loss, by doubling up on a loss. Whereas if you bet the same unit you need 750 spins. But in those 750 spins it's quite possible to hit a loss of 750 units... The "worst" (because it's very unlikely, but not impossible to get 6 in a 1000 spins) it gets is 5. That'd mean 5 steps in the progression so that's 16-32 units betting.

The way I see it... instead of betting 10 base units flat, you bet 1 unit knowing a loss might occur but 6 in a 1000 spins is like once in a lifetime. So you kind of wait for the bad to happen before betting what you want (which in this case is after step 4 -> 8 units). Therefor you minimized the risk & reduced the spin count by 50% to recover. And improved return when on a loss.
If you flat bet 10 base units, you keep going  about breakeven when hitting a loss. You are more prone for the bad to happen, so it's more like a hit and run if you are lucky.
Of course you need to have a longterm winning strategy in the first place, not just a luck one.
I'm always willing to help, just ask me!
Skills: 2D/3D/Flash/(X)HTML/CSS/Js/PHP/MySQL/Multimedia/Interior Design & Design in general/...

Compa

Jordan is the Roulette Expert here. He is the One that knows Everything but got Nothing. He probably lost all his money in the Casino. So now he tells everybody how to play.always very positive statements..lmao


Cheers!

F_LAT_INO

Quote from: Compa on Aug 29, 09:05 AM 2010
Jordan is the Roulette Expert here. He is the One that knows Everything but got Nothing. He probably lost all his money in the Casino. So now he tells everybody how to play.always very positive statements..lmao


Cheers!
Compa mate,
You really don't know Jordan/J.Claude,Wipper/very well.
He is only provoking,hopping that somebody give him
a winning strategy that he can not find as yet,even thought every
of his threads are winning methods,until he finds/by other testers ofcourse/
it is complete fiascos.Ilike his persistence,thought.

You can always get me on  
ivica.boban@ri.t-com.hr

vladir

Quote from: F_LAT_INO on Aug 29, 01:34 PM 2010
Compa mate,
You really don't know Jordan/J.Claude,Wipper/very well.
He is only provoking,hopping that somebody give him
a winning strategy that he can not find as yet,even thought every
of his threads are winning methods,until he finds/by other testers ofcourse/
it is complete fiascos.Ilike his persistence,thought.


LOL xD funny comment

And... the only way to get a winning system with only 40 units bankroll is if you have paranormal abilities and can predict with extreme accuracy (like 70% or more) where the ball will land... wich is science fiction, until someone proves I'm wrong. But please, prove me I'm wrong here xD
"In God we trust; all others must bring data", W. Edwards Deming

Timo

Hi! Worth of reading Numeris Titanus I think...  >:D




Timo

woods101

Hi,

I have been playing around with something similiar. 4 numbers is a good way to go. At the moment I don't think bet selection matters that much but out of interest, how do you select your 4 numbers?

I favour waiting for a number to repeat within the last 5 numbers and then playing those 4 numbers (last 5 drawn). I feel that there may be an advantage to this based on either the law of the third or some type of 'dealer signature' type of affair. I haven't bothered to try to work out why this seems to work quite well but it does. When I play, I play live wheel, and if I am not getting a result on one wheel I will switch wheels and continue progression. I play for 9 spins before upping the progression. After this the numbers become more distant from the last number drawn and the predicted freq of repeats drops of quite a lot (law of the third) after that so I reset and increase at that point.
Are you still playing/testing your idea?

Woods

-