• Welcome to #1 Roulette Forum & Message Board | www.RouletteForum.cc.

News:

Odds and payouts are different things. If either the odds or payouts don't change, then the result is the same - eventual loss.

Main Menu
Popular pages:

Roulette System

The Roulette Systems That Really Work

Roulette Computers

Hidden Electronics That Predict Spins

Roulette Strategy

Why Roulette Betting Strategies Lose

Roulette System

The Honest Live Online Roulette Casinos

More PB testing

Started by mattymattz, Jun 21, 02:22 PM 2012

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

amk

I just look at it like this.

If a trusted friend told me they had been playing several methods with great success for several years I would say thanks for sharing that with me. I would not discredit him or her. I would seriously consider playing as they advised. Might I not have the same success ofcourse, nothing is for sure but it will most likely give me the best chance for success.

There are several players on the forum who have shared their winning methods, even though a million spin test might show their method to fail. They don't seem to care and the months keep passing by.

Hows your EC method going warrior? can you drop us any hints?

TwoCatSam

amk

If it weren't for you and Warrior and a few others who seem to be fair and rational people, I wouldn't even consider that any JL method or matrix might work.  If I had a trusted friend who told me something I would listen.

winkle was a man who could teach for hours and never change a word in his original thesis.  No tweaks; no new-and-improved version.  Just taught the same old stuff.

With systems posted today, you read the original rules and go away for a month to play.  When you get back, you find you were playing by the wrong rules and here are the new ones.

Mistakes happen, like flukey's 12 street not being explained, but most systems are almost 100% different from the first idea.

You are such a good representative of PATTERN BREAKER that I find it hard to let the idea go.

That is a compliment.

Sam
If dogs don't go to heaven, when I die I want to go where dogs go.  ...Will Rogers

Johnlegend

Quote from: amk on Jun 23, 07:41 AM 2012
Hello Robenhuut,

Sorry to bring up Einstein but his name does seem to be connected to roulette. If we listen to Einsteins conclusion then it does not make any sense to play or research roulette and by that logic the nature of the universe. I for one believe that Einsteins theory will not be upheld anymore within the next few years or even months. Is it not strange that only a few great minds are promoted by the system? We have never seen Nikola Tesla being promoted by the system except as a name for a car, which is really a slap in our faces. Nikola Tesla is not promoted because the world will change for the better. It is best to keep us at Einstein level so to keep us in place.

Is the universe random, I don't think so due to the phi ratio. Is roulette random? Can we discover something new about roulette and its randomness that has been overlooked by even a great mind such as Einstein?
Beautiful post AMK. I could never have written that any better. Next few months absolutely. Im ready.

Johnlegend

Quote from: TwoCatSam on Jun 23, 07:43 AM 2012
John

Don't recall I've ever said that roulette can't be beaten.  Like Rob, I question your methods.

If I told you all I had to do to win was walk the dogs exactly a mile, drink one bottle of water and bet red as soon as I could log on--would you think red had a better chance of winning.  That is how dislocated you ideas are from each other.

I'm certainly waiting with eager anticipation for PATTERN7, but I'll not try to bribe you for an early peek.

Sam
Sam will you please drop the bribe line already. Its getting old. I don't believe my ideas are dislocated. I believe some peoples minds are too steeped in math law to allow for them to really go for them with an open mind. That's where I differ from you Sam. Everything you do has to have a reason. Random has no reason it just is. And what I've been saying since day one. Is the only two ways you truly beat this game. Are to A, identify a virtual Limit. something random is poor at performing. And B, maximizing that finding with a multi-level staking plan.

That's all there is to it Sam, no fancy math equation or code supreme to unlock the mystery of random. What maths did in my opinion was confuse and over-complicate the whole business of beating this game. Its like too many people are trying too hard. When the two afforementioned aspects of winning are what you REALLY need to focus on. I've identified recently two things that random really can't do. It doesn't want to know. That's all. And I've forged them into playable methods that's all. And I'm ready to show them in action.

TwoCatSam

John

I sincerely hope you beat the test.  I doubt there's a soul on the forum who's truly against you.

Someone drag Bayes out of the hills and make him get to work.

Sam
If dogs don't go to heaven, when I die I want to go where dogs go.  ...Will Rogers

mattymattz

JL,

my doubts aren't "steeped in math" but the fact that it takes forever to even get a trigger (atleast with PB).  And I hear you always saying you must be patient, which is fine, but you'd be at the casino all day just to place 1 bet... that might lose! 

MM

Johnlegend

Quote from: mattymattz on Jun 23, 11:27 AM 2012
JL,

my doubts aren't "steeped in math" but the fact that it takes forever to even get a trigger (atleast with PB).  And I hear you always saying you must be patient, which is fine, but you'd be at the casino all day just to place 1 bet... that might lose! 

MM
Matty I take it you can't bet online?? Well I don't wait for a losing trigger. I don't have AMKs patience. But I have enough. I play High and Low and Odd and even SIMULTANEOUSLY. If the first one loses. I treble stakes on the second that's ALL. Playing hit and run my overall strikerate is anyway from 10/1 to 12/1 at any given time in the month. The rock solid double loss rule boosts the profit margin.

Another thing you guys aren't thinking about is tracking. I don't track virgin spins never have. I walk into a casino or go online. And the first thing I do is write down all the numbers on the marker board. Form them into matrices for my various methods. And get to work. So I can have for example 4 patterns for Pattern breaker INSTANTLY. All this talk of waiting all day. Is over-exaggeratted. Get on with it.

Johnlegend

Quote from: TwoCatSam on Jun 23, 11:18 AM 2012
John

I sincerely hope you beat the test.  I doubt there's a soul on the forum who's truly against you.

Someone drag Bayes out of the hills and make him get to work.

Sam
That's the best thing youve said in ages Sam. Yeah get that Bayes back here NOW LoL.

superman

QuoteThat's the best thing youve said in ages Sam. Yeah get that Bayes back here NOW LoL

LOL, agreed, good man Sam ..... Bayes is on his way home, where's your patience now? ROFLMAO
There's only one way forward, follow random, don't fight with it!

Ignore a thread/topic that mentions 'stop loss', 'virtual loss' and also when a list is provided of a progression, mechanical does NOT work!

Johnlegend

Lol it left town with Bayes, Superman,

TwoCatSam

I said to the Lord, "Give me patience--right now!"

I got Johnlegend instead....

>:D

You da boogeyman, John..

TCS
If dogs don't go to heaven, when I die I want to go where dogs go.  ...Will Rogers

Johnlegend

Quote from: TwoCatSam on Jun 23, 04:58 PM 2012
I said to the Lord, "Give me patience--right now!"

I got Johnlegend instead....

>:D

You da boogeyman, John..

TCS
Thanks three times the charm Sam.

-