D-Day for roulette!

[Master_of_pockets]

"""So you show us the graph of a grail
Then you want people to code for you without knowing the grail
Then you will show us results of the grail
And that's it...

How much tormet do ya think we can take !"""

Exactly.

And yes I have a serious question....
Did the progression hit  the table limit?

[Master_of_pockets]

""you should know that on the system who is a long-term winner stop-loss WILL WORK"""

In theory yes....but still the downs according to the graph shows that u will lose a lot of times ur stop loss.....the downs are huge mate.

[speed]

So you show us the graph of a grail
Then you want people to code for you without knowing the grail
Then you will show us results of the grail
And that's it...

How much tormet do ya think we can take !

I do not know there are still some other way to get winning system, but now you know one way!

If any of you are so good to share this with the whole world for free, I must say that I am not.

dont hit table limit.

[Master_of_pockets]

""don't hit table limit.""

Ok now You have my attention ! 

Yes 700.000 spins is a very good test that can show that a system may have a potential to be a winner.
I hope u did everything correct.

[Still]

VLS, by deviation i mean on the positive and negative, in this particular case i use system against deviation on EC bet.

Ophis,MOP, I know that is not playable on this graph because i don't know yet how to code stop-loss, BUT you should know that on the system who is a long-term winner stop-loss WILL WORK(in theory)i hope. This is still the beta version of the system. And i not use minimal bet as starting.

I need somebody who is trusted to code stop-loss and some modification, and some to code this on dozens and columns. When I find someone i will put the results here. 

This graph looks like a good candidate for a moving average of sorts.  A moving average is a kind of stop-loss.  If the action is right, it may also be possible to make money when the graph is under the moving average by simply reversing your EC bets. 

If RX won't do this easily, i would be interested in coding it with a moving average of sorts.  A quick way to find out if a moving average would help would be for you to send me results in a spreadsheet, and i will apply the MA logic to it and spit out a new chart based on your other chart.

[haloBing]

If any of you are so good to share this with the whole world for free, I must say that I am not.

So you do like Nikola Tesla, but not his generosity

[speed]

 I just tested the system with some modifications that are supposed to prevent a large hole in the bankroll. It seems that the system still varies and is not safe to play.

[speed]

coder is finally finished with all the modifications I asked and system finally looks like its playable. With these new things profit is reduced but the hole in the bank too. Now i will try this for real money on some fast RNG and tell you what is the results.

[Master_of_pockets]

Yes the improvement is very nice.
But still it has a 7.000 chips down and a recover in approx. 15.000 spins. 
Hope it can get any better.
Good luck

2 advices and 1 question.
1)don't play RNG
2)test to reach 1M spins

Does the system include a betting selection or it s only money management?

[beretta28]

If I have well understood,your bkr balance is + 48000 units in 350.000 spins,i.e 13,71%.
A result like that must be sent to Norway Academy for math Nobel prize.


I must confess that with an exceptional positive deviation(in favour of the player I mean!) and a strong positive progression(up as you win!,never negative progression!) I have seen a method on pattern of four spins,called Cecil Swan system,still in positive bkr balance after 300.000 spins.It failed at 500.000
Never seen in my life rsults like yours,
Good suggestion of MOP:try to reach 1 million spins,but already 700.000 is fantastic!

[vile]

So you do like Nikola Tesla, but not his generosity

--If he was like Nikola Tesla,he wouldn't care about
money and would give his method to the world like NT
gave a light/not Edison as Amers believe/

[speed]

guys, I have to say that the test on RNG for real money for now not very well passed.

beretta28, you have the right to almost everything you wrote, it seems that you only understand what is a deviation and positive progression and how they are connected. For those who would like to know on what it is based my system they need to read your post.

Tonight I'll run another test with 37 millions spins, a result of the graphics and all the statistics I will post here. I hope that this will be enough to see what is the maximum hole in bankroll so I knew what the bank is required for play, and is there a need for additional modifications.

vile, I saw that you do not know anything about Tesla when you a few days ago denied his origin

[Master_of_pockets]

"""A result like that must be sent to Norway Academy for math Nobel prize."""

I agree . 1st go and make 10 M euros/dollars and then claim the Nobel prize 

"""guys, I have to say that the test on RNG for real money for now not very well passed."""

I already adviced you not to play RNG.
I also adviced you to run more tests.

[Drazen]

guys, I have to say that the test on RNG for real money for now not very well passed.

You gotta be kidding dear neighbour! Realy?


Cheers

[TwoCatSam]

I am going to agree with speed.  OK, maybe I'm dumb...........Been worse!

This is what I feel--have no proof.

I play a mechanical system on BV.  I see one thing happen.  When I use the bot--that is when it will work and not corrupt my computer--I see totally different things.  I feel BV knows full well I am running a bot for real money.

Ever see those video games with different levels of difficulty?  I feel BV simply goes to a level of greater difficulty when a bot is detected.

I'm done with the robot.  I'll try it as a tool for Dublin--which was all I wanted anyway--but not for BV.

Still, I've had a lot of fun and I'm not griping.

Sam