PCWB-FINALLY ACCOMPLISHED INTO LIFE BET

[Timo]

@ Vile
I already tested your privius method and I posted the results of 300 spins that lost Huge!!!Atlantis confirmed because I had posted the spins.....

What U did was deleting my post at least 10 times (like u did in this one too so I am copying/pasting  it again)
and also u claimed that the numbers weren t real and that I on perpose posted fake spins numbers to show that your unbeatable method can lose....
UNREAL!
So thanks but I don't have the mood to do it again , as I already know how You are gonna react!

Ps... the proof that Vile is Casinopitbull is that he deleted this post .

If you are so fu+king smart, so show it.


Regads Timo

[Timo]

Vile have something but Brutus not.


Regards Timo

[TwoCatSam]

To whomever deleted my post:

Why?

I am telling the truth.

Sam

[unre4lbg]

Just as an interesting idea. Can't see all the angles, but what if 10 players sat around the roulette table with a 1000 BR each. They all played different methods. At the end of +-2 hours play they divided the winnings amongst themselves and continued....  At some points they would increase their betting amounts and some players wouldn't?

i was thinking something alike too.. what if 2 or more players play two systems that when one system loose the other breaks even with the loss, and all the way aroung. BUT when the 2 systems win, the players make profit  Sounds like sci-fi right?

[malcop]

i was thinking something alike too.. what if 2 or more players play two systems that when one system lose the other breaks even with the loss, and all the way aroung. BUT when the 2 systems win, the players make profit  Sounds like sci-fi right?

It a bit strange last night, I was discussing the very same subject with a forum member on Skype, checked in the forum and saw AMK's post!  It seems a lot of us have been having the same idea of team play 

[malcop]

To whomever deleted my post:

Why?

I am telling the truth.

Sam

Sam, I never saw your post what was in it?

[malcop]

no didint start yet. waiting for some donations... and suggestions...
what should be next casino implemented...

BV will be for 100 euro... but implementing other casinos takes time...  and time is money.

Hi ophis, I know you will do BV first, and that is not a problem that way we can see how the system works with the tracker/bot.  Once we are happy then we can request diffrent casinos, you already know that I wan't William Hill and will pay for that if the system pans out.

As far as requests are concerned I would like a clicker like MST so that the software can place bets for you when you are using the software in manual/tracker mode, that is crucial for me because trying to get all my bets on in under 30 seconds is not always easy.

I will send you my payment toninght when I get back from some business I have to tend to, hopefully by then you would have received a few more payments and can start coding.

BTW do you have Neteller?  Would rather send payment that way if I can, not paypal it is.

Thanks

malcop

[vile]

To whomever deleted my post:

Why?

I am telling the truth.

Sam

Sam,
I did as the subject was on your own thread,discussed with other members/there are more then
100/that downloaded Ophis bot and nobody reported virus except you.Some even try to help you
how to solve problem,but you are convinced it come from Ophis bot.Why posting it again in my thread..only you know it.Try to scan it to other/wife computer/and you will find the truth...or you can scan it to me and I will download it and report back.

[TwoCatSam]

OK, Vile, no problem.

[xxlakis]

Ophis mate,
Only few suggestions about stakings level;

--Any los under 10 ch.in individual cycle attack---bet same next cycle attack

--Any los over 10 ch. in individual cycle attack---rise 1 ch. next cycle attack.

--Any los over 10 ch.in dual cycle attack --rise 1 ch.next cycle attack.

--Any los over 10 ch.in triple cycle attack--rise 1 ch.next cycle atack.

--Any win from 10 -20 ch.--in individual cycle attack--reduce 1 ch.

--......................20-40................................................reduce 2 ch.

  .......................40-60...............................................reduce  3 ch.

.........................60-80...............................................reduce 4 ch.

.........................60-100.............................................reduce 5 ch.

-You get the idea....any suggestion from you.

Just a clarification.The +1 chip on single,dual or triple cycle attack when we have -10 loss adds up?Exmaple:


100 chips
next cycle
88 chips (-12 so we raise +1)
next cycle
66 chips (-22,so now we raise only +1 for the 88-66 loss or +2 for the 100-66 loss and 88-66 loss?)

[vile]

Just a clarification.The +1 chip on single,dual or triple cycle attack when we have -10 loss adds up?Exmaple:


100 chips
next cycle
88 chips (-12 so we raise +1)
next cycle
66 chips (-22,so now we raise only +1 for the 88-66 loss or +2 for the 100-66 loss and 88-66 loss?)

--On any lose over 10 ch.rise 1 ch.......but on winnings is only my suggestion how to pla
  /it is how I presently play by head,no spreadsheet/--and am waiting for any other suggestion
that may arise regarding this matter...think that Ophis will have some suugestion also.
As when you play this without bot you have control of what is happening as chips are in front
of you and you see what's going on...any suggestions from you xxlakis.

[malcop]

I think the bot/tracker if it ever gets created should by default play exactley the way vile lade out in his spreadsheets, that's the only way to prove that viles system works long term as per his inctructions, anyother progressions should be options for the user to select if they wish to use them.

Thanks

malcop

[Shogun]

Hi have played this system for two sessions.

I think a big bank roll is required. First session was a bit up and down but finished up after 1.5 hours at about 12 units. The second seession which was also for about 1.5 hours i finished 18 units up but i had been down almost 500 units. But at least it recovered.

The bet where we bet on 8 sectors which then gives us the 4 sectors to bet on, do we really need to do this? I lost 3 in a row. We are betting a lot of chips to win so few. I think it would be better to take the free spin and you will have the result to bet on your 4 sectors. What do you guys think or do?

Hope this does not sound too newbie 

Cheeers.

[Robeenhuut]

Hi have played this system for two sessions.

I think a big bankroll is required. First session was a bit up and down but finished up after 1.5 hours at about 12 units. The second seession which was also for about 1.5 hours i finished 18 units up but i had been down almost 500 units. But at least it recovered.

The bet where we bet on 8 sectors which then gives us the 4 sectors to bet on, do we really need to do this? I lost 3 in a row. We are betting a lot of chips to win so few. I think it would be better to take the free spin and you will have the result to bet on your 4 sectors. What do you guys think or do?

Hope this does not sound too newbie 

Cheeers.

Not at all. I would do it virtually.  Nobody wins in roulette risking 8u 2 win 1u. Ok its still a qualifying sort of bet but in my opinion not necessary. And 2 recover losses when 0 or middle sector hits?  I think that PCWB  would  be a better bet without it but what do i know?

[33]

Shogun and Rob,

You both are right.Testing it individually 8 sectors against mid sector in the rolling
way,over 30000 spins,8 sectors come out as a winner,therefore why I put this
as a opening bet instead of virtual.Last night in casino was doing well,222 ch.plus,
and 33/sectoe 9 was 5th.sector/......first bet 33,second 33,third 30,4th 30,5th 36,
6th.33.......lost all that was winning plus 90 chips.......that's why my new name 33,
and when I come home this morning lost myself on the forum also...therefore is 33.
We must here go on 4 last,when lose switch to 5 furthest.Vile---now 33....
gee wish it was true........LoL