PCWB-FINALLY ACCOMPLISHED INTO LIFE BET

[amk]

P.S.

I typed "F l a t i n o" connecting while writing. When I posted, it automatically became F_LAT_INO

Howd that happen?

[Still]

If Ophis makes a bot, i think what i will do is make another bot that controls ophis's bot using AutoIt3.  The purpose of this bot would be to mimic human behavior so as to avoid being kicked out and/or disqualified...so as to stay under the radar...in order to make money longer. 

What i would appreciate are some suggestions about what is considered normal human behavior...what is the signature of the average person who logs into an online casino on a daily basis.  For starters, i don't think the bot ought to be allowed to play more than four hours per day (at the same casino), and not too fast.    I'm sure it could also be set to play until a certain number of units were won...or lost.    Any suggestions?

link:://:.autoitscript.com/site/autoit/

P.S.~ I also think the whole thing could be set up on a server out in the cloud such as with Amazon Web Services Ec2...and that the location of the server can be a matter of choice to get around US problems with IP addresses.  But that's speculative as yet. 

[amk]

Still,

I think the bot would just have to play random amounts of time, ranging form 20 minutes to an hour perhaps 2. What is important is to never have a playing time end on rounded minutes, for example 20 or 40 ect. The times would have to be random, sometimes 22 minutes or 46, 128 etc never 20,30,40,50 etc

Just playing for a certain amount of units per session would do the trick I think. Sometimes 2,8,11 etc however never longer than say 2 hours. So on average the units won per game would not exceed perhaps 8.

I don't think you can prove that is a bot playing and in essence it is not. It is doing what is humanly possible, how you would actually play it. You would not play for 8 or 12 consecutive hours per day.

[Still]

@amk

Thanks very much.  I think all that is very doable; random start/stop (within a range of odd minutes); length of play; stop at a range of units won (example: 2-11) or lost; variable session lengths not exceeding 2 hours each.  Random rest periods (including a daily rest of at least 10 hours).   Only thing left is the rate of spins.  For sure, the rate of spinning cannot be constant.  That too must vary a bit, and must be on average x per minute.  Any suggestions on x per minute appreciated. 

Also, i don't think you are Winkle because it appears that American/English is your native language (same as mine).  His is German if i'm not mistaken.   

[amk]

I would only let the bot play live wheel Still.

Your right, Im not Winkel LoL.

He might be out there though?

Hello???

[Still]

I would only let the bot play live wheel Still.

The AutoIt bot could play either (it would just control the playing bot) so it would be up to the player and whatever Ophis' bot (or whatever bot) could handle/play.  I suppose it could also select between various casino accounts, whether live wheel or RNG. 

[vile]

F_LAT_INO can you explain us why u chose those 9 groups?

-
--Can....Last few years have been stydy and playing PCWB all sort of versions,
  some lose some win,and throughout this time noticed that these sectors have a tendency
of repeating,especially at the start of this journey,when playing 4/5 furthest sectors.
Also noticed that sleeping sectors once awakened do it in repeating fashion.Hence why
now created this method which btw relays on repeaters.

[vile]

@Ophis



@Vile
can you tell me if  the bot will be public
or only for those who have payed ?

--Wouldn't know mate,should ask Dr.Ophis

[vile]

I think you can read about it, if you want. I haven't but I think Flat have played "few" years of roulette and he is not lier. Sure about that.


Regards Timo

--And btw just come from night session of about 4 hours.
The method gents works superb,but without decent BR
you can't play this,nor any other method in live casino.

[vile]

 

Question: Is this bet considered better then PCWB (mod as previously laid out? Is there a difference?

There is a great difference.

[vile]

don't u think that to make such claims, the bet has to be tested 1st in a lot of spins?

--Man if you read my rules of play you will find out that testing zillion spins
is for these that don't play roulette,and am testing wiesbaden session one by one
that is how I do.And if you wish to test this do it also session by session and at the end
of hundreds session you will find if it works or not.....that's exactly how I did it.
Did you notice my excel date.Start from today and backwards and you will find out if it works or not.

[vundarosa]

--And by the way just come from night session of about 4 hours.
The method gents works superb,but without decent BR
you can't play this,nor any other method in live casino.

------------------

hi Flatino,  would you say 1000u BR should survive with this bet?!

vundarosa

[Robeenhuut]

Just 2 questions. Why do we win 2u betting 8u on 8 out of 9 sectors? In my math if we bet 1u on each sector its 0.5u bet on each split n it pays 9u.  And why don't we bet virtually 2 determine which sector 2 bet on? Risking 8 units 2 win 1u its not such a good idea in my opinion.

P.S

Never mind math, i got it wrong. Here where i live is basically always very hot.

[vile]

I don't bother about BR when going to play.
Here attached final score of started excel,
and if any typos,sorry.And you can see from
the session in excel how this behave and what's
the highest drawndown there was.

[vile]

"""-Man if you read my rules of play you will find out that testing zillion spins
is for these that don't play roulette,"""

But u said earlier that with this bet we can play continuously in as many spins as we want!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Did that change?

Continously per a session,now some sleep after hard night casino work.