YOU can't BEAT ROULETTE

[Master_of_pockets]

if u think You have found a more flexible way to predict than VB and that its OK with the nowdays conditions then good for you....
But I personally don't believe that anything different than VB is better .....and even if there is something that it isn t VB , the accuracy (advantage) would be so low that it will still rely on luck....

But if You have found something strong then good for ya....its just not my way of playing anymore...

And all about "increase the accuracy of predictions" is very familiar to me because as i said  i have done it 1st hand.

[Steve]

I'll clarify the following: if done correctly with every variable possible, VB is as accurate as you can get. But the problem with VB is when you use all available data, it becomes impossible to do without electronic devices. That is why the most accurate can possibly get with a properly designed Roulette computer. The next best is a god-like vb Player, with which skills beyond imagination. Next best is a full analysis with the intention of Betting before the wheel is Spun.

Every method I teach and use is ballistic in nature.

As for system play being your choice, I'm just saying that it is literally impossible to win in the long term unless you first increase the accuracy of your predictions. The exception is if you are beyond lucky

[Master_of_pockets]

"""As for system play being your choice, I'm just saying that it is literally impossible to win in the long term"""

yes mate sure. and this is why i am testing everything.....

[speed]

Steve, is your lite roulette computer is better then VB, and why, or why not? (i believe that uber and hybrid yes, but they are too much for my standard)

[Steve]

Steve, is your lite roulette computer is better then VB, and why, or why not?

The lite RC is pretty much exactly the same accuracy as a VB player that uses a method that calculates where the rotor will be when the ball is in the last revolution. It doesn't calculate difference in ball bounce with different rotor speeds - only rotor position.

My basic computer uses the typical vb approach, but does not take rotor speed and end position into account. So it is exactly the same accuracy as most vb players.

The uber and hybrid do much more, including calculating scatter based on different rotor speeds, finding ball fall points where scatter is minimal, adjusting for ball bounce on different rotor speeds in combination with the ball fall points and more. Really they do everything possible. They can't get more accurate. They can only be easier to use and that is where development is going.

footnote: the basic computer is similar to mark howe's "radical" computer. It is very basic nonsense. I think he created that computer because his customers made his other computers available for free (hardware cant be downloaded like software, so he whipped up a microprocessor thumper and called it the best computer ever). Howe says his radical computer does air pressure adjustments, that its the best computer etc. He is absolutely full of it that clown. Forester's ffa is very similar to my lite computer.

[Ralph]

It is possible to win a lot on a game as roulette. There are many who had won. It is however not possible to play so you win 100%. The reason i do not test my methods millions times is I know it will not pas, and some tests has been done by others 100 years ago. Everything has risks, who simulate the driving to work in a computer millions of time, before they are sure the will drive safe. Why should just a game of all things in the world be without risk, everything else has. Looking for STD  may work, but takes a lot of effort, and here is a situation a computer can be handy.

In the game people use to be carefully and calculate risks then on plus, but go mad to very fast catch up a loss.

Last week I went up from a bankroll of  200000 units to 1800000 units, a lot of play, but steady up.
A few times risking a lot to recover, but it was never close to my start balance.
(by the way that made me look into this forum). The units is 1 cent, but still its sometimes 5000 and more on the table.

I have been checking German forums before and found some tips , and Herr Winkel I see is here sometimes.

You find tables online with fair odds, so I do not find reason to play with zeros online.

The main method I use, is I do not think a sleeping number is to trust, I can do it with doz, and cols, but not numbers. Numbers repeat, and i try to use that.

I use a similar way as Herr Winkle use with streets, fib until you win. He use sleeping streets, but I select 5 numbers with has shown about 10 spins back. Play it on a  table with one more balls than I got. That means the hitting is more often, and even if it needs more hit, they just  come more and give units for the next bet. I do changes methods, as the wheel changes the outcomes.

Methods with low risks, use to gain too low for recovering any loss. There are exceptions, like GUETTING  progression. Low risk to loose much, but  can take time to obtain a good streak. Every bust martingaler should regrett not have use this progression.

The best way to keep a good winning, is to play less until you spent it on other things than game.

So you can beat the wheel, and the wheel can beat you, as in all other way, we take match by match. In the long run we are all dead anyhow. A good winning make at least the day!