TWO UNCLES ON DIFFERENT TABLES BOTH WON--and still winning

[Wally Gator]

Looking at "uncle results 13", it appears you are playing 5 sectors at a time, but on a loss are subtracting only 8.  Here's an example (beginning on Line 50 of the spreadsheet)


#     Sector     Trigger     Win     Loss     Units Amount
29       8
19       4
04       1
33       9
20       5          59148
15       6          23678               8- (why is this 8- ... should it be 10-?) .. this is the case for the rest of the spreadsheet
02       2                                   8+
04       1          12659       10-   10-      10-   1  end cycle attack

[F_LAT_INO]

Thanks for correction WG,was thinking 5/5 and doing 4/5...too hot mate,wouldn't change anything anyhow,if it would you would inform us...good that you study it as you might find it very good.

[Wally Gator]

Thanks F_LAT.  Wanted to make sure I'm playing it correctly with all the various options.  So far, I've yet to have a bad session.  Some longer than others, but none have gone beyond the parameters of 100+ stop-win within 300 spins and a BR of 1000.  Good of you sharing ....

[F_LAT_INO]

Thanks F_LAT.  Wanted to make sure I'm playing it correctly with all the various options.  So far, I've yet to have a bad session.  Some longer than others, but none have gone beyond the parameters of 100+ stop-win within 300 spins and a BR of 1000.  Good of you sharing ....

Iknow mate as have tested 62 by now all won.....in casino/just going/easy 100 chips every night,
except there you got to be full/more then 1000/for aiming 100

[Wally Gator]

Here's an example of a typical session for me so far.  I've done about 30 sessions .... real wheel, real casino.  Waiting for the sequence from hell .....

[GLC]

Here's an example of a typical session for me so far.  I've done about 30 sessions .... real wheel, real casino.  Waiting for the sequence from hell .....

Wally,  Have you been playing for +100 each session?

Do you mind giving us a breakdown of your sessions?

Any losses or are they all wins?

Average number of spins to reach +100.

Largest draw down.

Largest bet.

Also, are you playing this on double zero or single zero?

This is looking like the cat's meoooo:ww.

I just have to figure out where I can play it.

George

[F_LAT_INO]

George mate,
Wally is playing double zero.Me tested 62 Wiesbaden sessions all won aimed 100 or more chips.
Also tested those same sessions in continuation 53 won 9 lost/but neither required BR of 1000/
Wins versus Loses
W=23652 chips
L=   1926 chips........tells you how strong this is.Relays on sector repeats which inevitably are
happening throughout the game,mostly at the start and some in the second part of the game.
Haven't lost in casino as yet,but only problem is that several nights in the row am folling asleep
on the table.May be sun and high temp.or may be years LOL

[Robeenhuut]

George mate,
Wally is playing double zero.Me tested 62 Wiesbaden sessions all won aimed 100 or more chips.
Also tested those same sessions in continuation 53 won 9 lost/but neither required BR of 1000/
Wins versus Loses
W=23652 chips
L=   1926 chips........tells you how strong this is.Relays on sector repeats which inevitably are
happening throughout the game,mostly at the start and some in the second part of the game.
Haven't lost in casino as yet,but only problem is that several nights in the row am folling asleep
on the table.May be sun and high temp.or may be years LoL

Flat

By loss did you mean that you ended in negative territory but you neither hit 100u nor lost your BR? 

[F_LAT_INO]

Exactly RH,


And this 63th. sssion from yesterday very similar to these 9 losing ones....
Didn't hit aimed 100 but at the end of session still won 50 with continual play.


And aiming 100 in most sessions won much more as playing untill the strike lasts,
but for showing sake don't bother going further after 100 won.
Once was on 5 chips 120 - and after 18 wins x 40=720 min.100=620 min.120=500
and many sssions like that after long strikes.

[Robeenhuut]

Exactly RH,


And this 63th. sssion from yesterday very similar to these 9 losing ones....
Didn't hit aimed 100 but at the end of session still won 50 with continual play.


And aiming 100 in most sessions won much more as playing until the strike lasts,
but for showing sake don't bother going further after 100 won.
Once was on 5 chips 120 - and after 18 wins x 40=720 min.100=620 min.120=500
and many sssions like that after long strikes.

!8 in a row will always get you out of the hole.     My longest streak was only 10.

[F_LAT_INO]

don't bother testing with RNG numbers...that's fallacy,not roulete.

[Robeenhuut]

don't bother testing with RNG numbers...that's fallacy,not roulette.

I never test or play on RNG  Flat. Have lots of live wheel data.

[roulettefan]

@Rob
can you post results of your own test
so we can compare
thanks a lot

[GLC]

George mate,
Wally is playing double zero.Me tested 62 Wiesbaden sessions all won aimed 100 or more chips.
Also tested those same sessions in continuation 53 won 9 lost/but neither required BR of 1000/
Wins versus Loses
W=23652 chips
L=   1926 chips........tells you how strong this is.Relays on sector repeats which inevitably are
happening throughout the game,mostly at the start and some in the second part of the game.
Haven't lost in casino as yet,but only problem is that several nights in the row am folling asleep
on the table.May be sun and high temp.or may be years LoL

May be the years, mate.  I notice that I have no trouble falling asleep.  The problem is staying asleep long enough to get fully rested.  I suppose the double zero I have to play on will have some negative effects.  Evidently not so much as to hurt the system.

[Wally Gator]

Wally,  Have you been playing for +100 each session?

Do you mind giving us a breakdown of your sessions?

Any losses or are they all wins?

Average number of spins to reach +100.

Largest draw down.

Largest bet.

Also, are you playing this on double zero or single zero?

This is looking like the cat's meoooo:ww.

I just have to figure out where I can play it.

George

Hey George,


Sorry for the delay in responding.  I'm crazy busy right now for the next few days (other than roulette, unfortunately).  Yes, double 0 wheel is all I have access to unless I get to the point of playing with $10 chips per bet .... hopefully will be there soon.  Haven't played this enough yet to have the confidence to play over the $1 chip level.  Have played a total of 31 sessions so far and, unlike F_LAT, I've always made it to 100 chips.  So, I'm up a few bucks.  If I loose a BR or 2 back to back I'd stop this strategy and take the 1000 chips and say thank you.  If I get to the 100 session win level I'll move to the $10 chip single 0 table (it has a minimum inside bet of $50).


Here's something interesting that I've not tested, but have noticed.  Let's say you take F_LATs strategy here and apply Prof. Winkel's fibo prog strategy to a single win per sector.  You'd play less, but I can't see that losing very often.  Even a +1 -1 doing a single win per sector.  Like I said, I've not tested it, but just looking at F_LATs results you can see that it would work on all that he's provided.  I'll try to test it in the next few weeks.  Right now my spare time is being spent at the casino as my time is limited and tuition is due for the upcoming semester for my kids