***TRILOGY***

[Johnlegend]

JAG Targets our often unrealistic, I rarely hav a day where I finish with less than I started, I will show you all this soon,

[Bayes]

John, I assume you're going to be only betting on the outside (ECs and Doz/Col) in this test? if so, I can make a cut-down version of the program which will be much quicker to write. Later I'll extend it but for now I'm keen to get this show on the road.

[Chauncy47]

Hit and Run doesn't work like that with say pattern breaker, I playing two even chances together, In 3830 games only twice have I Lost them both, Sam thinks I am dodging his offer, I'm NOT, I'm simply delaying it, I want to prove first I can win before I hand it to him, So if he can't make it win no one can say it fails, Because I've already done it, that's why I'm waiting for Bayes,

Hi JL, I am back after a week on the road....I will also share my results from Hit & Run style... along with the methods used.   Results remain solid....  another observation after watching so many people lose their BR ....greed is a killer....play hit and run, stick to the rules and then leave the casino ....  Ok, I'll pop in later.   

[TwoCatSam]

that's why I'm waiting for Bayes

While John is waiting for Bayes, perhaps we should coolly discuss something.

I feel we need to establish the definition of a win or loss concerning this test.  It needs to be fair to John and within reason.

Would someone hazard a guess?

TwoCat

[Johnlegend]

Hi Chauncy47 absolutely greed indeed, Another reason to do this test is to show short play will over the long run improve the strikerate,

[Chauncy47]

Hi Chauncy47 absolutely greed indeed, Another reason to do this test is to show short play will over the long run improve the strikerate,

I would agree.  Last night was the first night where I have ever seen all the tables at the casino set with a $10 min.  Regardless, results still the same but a first time for me at that level so enjoyed the moment.  It was a quick night and played D&C, Code 4, P4, D&C Hybrid and Code 4....and then making a quick exit.   Quite frankly, I feel a bit lonely when playing as I am the only person ever playing on the outside...LOL

[Johnlegend]

Being a smart player is a lonely business Chauncy47, 99% of playerr will uphold the usual thinking on the game through pure greed and stupidity, I was once one of them, You are playing hit and run exactly as its meant to be played, So your results are no surprise, Now imagine there was 10,000 players in North America playing EXACTLY like you, A message would be sent through the industrx,

[Johnlegend]

RESULTS UPDATE FOR TRILOGY FOR 07/07/2012

TOTAL GAMES PLAYED 500

TOTAL GAMES WON 493

TOTAL GAMES LOST 7

STRIKERATE APPROX 70/1

BALANCE 318 UNITS PLUS

STEP 1 WINS 255

STEP 2 WINS 221

STEP 3 WINS 17----LOSSES 7

The virtual trigger has proved its value over the last 500 game sample. Without it I would have suffered 17x26 in losses resulting in 500-442 giving me only 58 units profit. With it I have now secured 318 units profit. Its certainly worth the wait.

[woods101]

Does anyone here actually know something, other than an unverified/garbled/popularist quote, about a famous physicist's life and work?  Here is a bit about Einstein, the man... link:://:.neatorama.com/2007/03/26/10-strange-facts-about-einstein/ .

Anyway, here we go yet again with the proposed "testing" of the completely-baseless stuff.  I think that Bayes needs JL, as much as versa?

Did Einstein make even such-simple grammatical errors?  Egs, the mixed metaphor of "visually rewriting the thinking"; and the bad sytax of "very differently" rather than "as something different".  Does Bayes know the difference?

Sorry, Mr. Legend, but you sound like "a Wendel".  Remember him?  Except that Wendal came with also some kooky theories.  At least he tried, LoL, to "walk that sort of talk".

Sorry man but I can't resist- was liquor involved in the proceedings at all?
If ya gonna pull someone for grammatical error (when I assume you mean mis-quotation)
then ya can't pepper your statement with grammatical error and hope to get away with it.. surely?
We assume by 'versa' you mean vice versa.
We assume by 'Egs' you mean e.g., as an example?
We assume by 'sytax' you might mean...er...syntax. (I refuse to use the word ironic in this post, no matter what).
We assume that 'Wendal' and 'Wendel' who you refer to are actually the same person.
We assume that sh1t is at least 40% proof.
We assume you pull ya neck in a bit next time.
Obviously sometimes when we assume, we are wrong.

Woods.

[Robeenhuut]

RESULTS UPDATE FOR TRILOGY FOR 07/07/2012

TOTAL GAMES PLAYED 500

TOTAL GAMES WON 493

TOTAL GAMES LOST 7

STRIKERATE APPROX 70/1

BALANCE 318 UNITS PLUS

STEP 1 WINS 255

STEP 2 WINS 221

STEP 3 WINS 17----LOSSES 7

The virtual trigger has proved its value over the last 500 game sample. Without it I would have suffered 17x26 in losses resulting in 500-442 giving me only 58 units profit. With it I have now secured 318 units profit. Its certainly worth the wait.

Hola John

Do u still play 1 game in 20 spins frame? Anyway 1 game probably takes sometimes more than 20 spins. And virtual trigger is a 1stvirtual loss?  So u start betting after u lose 1st bet meaning that after 2 consecutive non matches there is a match? Then u play 3 step 1,3,9 prog?

Regards

[Johnlegend]

Hola John

Do u still play 1 game in 20 spins frame? Anyway 1 game probably takes sometimes more than 20 spins. And virtual trigger is a 1stvirtual loss?  So u start betting after u lose 1st bet meaning that after 2 consecutive non matches there is a match? Then u play 3 step 1,3,9 prog?

Regards

Yes hutt that's. Correct.

[Robeenhuut]

Yes hutt that's. Correct.

Thanks for clarification John.