• Welcome to #1 Roulette Forum & Message Board | www.RouletteForum.cc.

News:

Every system can win in the short-term. It just depends on the spins you play.

Main Menu
Popular pages:

Roulette System

The Roulette Systems That Really Work

Roulette Computers

Hidden Electronics That Predict Spins

Roulette Strategy

Why Roulette Betting Strategies Lose

Roulette System

The Honest Live Online Roulette Casinos

Standard Deviation math formula please!

Started by Master_of_pockets, Jul 15, 09:33 AM 2012

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

amk

Amazing contributions Ego, many thanks.


Always enjoy your info.


Right on the ball :)

albertojonas




*****
   B
R
R
   B
R
   B
R
   B
   B
R
   B
R
R
R
R
   B
R
   B
R
   B
R
   B
   B
   B
R
   B
R
   B
R
R
   B
   B
   B
   B
   B
   B
R
   B
   B
   B
   B
   B
R
R
R
R
   B
R
R
R
R
R
R
   B
R
   B
   B
   B
   B
   B
   B
R
   B
R
   B
R
   B
R
   B
R   <= 3 SD Singles vs Series
R
R
R
   B
   B
R      -1
   B   -2
R      
   B
R
R
R
   B
R
R
   B
   B   w-1
   B
   B
R
R      w 0
   B
*****
R
   B
R
R
   B
R
   B
R
   B
R
R
   B
R
   B
R
   B
R
   B
   B
R
   B
R
   B
R   <= 3 SD Singles vs Series
R
   B
R
R
   B   -1
R
R      0
   B
   B   1
R
*****
R
R
R
   B
R
   B
R
   B
R
   B
R
R
R
   B
R
   B
R
   B
R
R
R
R
R
   B
R
   B
   B
R
   B
R
   B
R   <= 3 SD Singles vs Series
R
   B
   B
   B
   B
   B
   B
R      -1
   B
   B    0
R
R      1
*****
   B
   B
R
   B
   B
   B
R
   B
   B
   B
   B
   B
   B
R
   B
R
   B
R
R
   B
R
   B
   B
   B
   B
R
R
R
   B
R
   B
R
R
R
   B
R
   B
R
   B
R
R
   B
R
   B
R
   B
R
   B
   B
   B
   B
R
   B
   B
R
   B
R
   B
R
   B   <= 3 SD Singles vs Series
   B
R
   B
   B
R      +1
R
*****
   B
R
   B
   B
   B
R
   B
R
   B
R
   B
R
   B
   B
R
   B
   B
R
   B
R
R
R
R
   B
R
   B
R
R
   B
R
   B
R
   B
R   <= 3 SD Singles vs Series
R
R
R
   B
R
R
   B
   B   +1
*****
R
R
   B
R
   B
R
   B
R
   B
   B
   B
R
   B
   B
   B
R
   B
R
   B
R
   B
R   <= 3 SD Singles vs Series
   B
   B
   B
R
R
   B
   B   +1
*****
   B
   B
   B
   B
   B
R
R
R
   B
R
R
R
R
   B
   B
R
R
R
   B
   B
   B
   B
R
R
   B
   B
R
   B
R
R
R
R
   B
   B
   B
R
   B
   B
R
R
R
R
R
   B
   B
R
   B
   B
R
   B
   B
   B
R
R
   B
   B
R
R
   B
   B
R
R
   B
   B
   B
R
R   <= 3 SD Series vs Singles
R
   B
R
   B   +1


R
*****
   B
   B
   B
   B
   B
   B
   B
   B
   B
   B
   B
   B
R
R
   B
   B
R
   B
R
R
R
R
   B
   B
R
R
R
   B
R
   B
   B
R
   B
   B
R
   B
   B
R
R
R
R
   B
   B
R
R
   B
   B
   B
   B
R
R
R
R
R
   B
   B
R
   B
   B
   B
R
R
   B
   B
   B
   B
   B
   B
R
   B
   B
   B
R
R
R
   B
R
R
R
   B
   B
   B
   B
R
R
R
R
   B
   B
   B
   B
R
   B
   B
R
   B
   B
R
   B
   B
   B
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
   B
R
R
R
   B
   B
R
R
R
   B
   B   <= 3 SD Series vs Singles
R
   B
R
R      -1
R
R
R
R
   B
   B   -2
R
   B
R      -1
   B   0
R
*****

monaco

Quote from: albertojonas on Jul 18, 12:47 PM 2012

That is the core of Marigny theories. The point being made is that he applied it to the Law of series.

It's fine to use singles v series as the example, but the principle should also be applicable to any selection, R/B, series of 2/>2 etc

For example, if you have 9 singles in a row (STD 3), not only have you got an STD of 3 in singles v series, you also have an STD of 3 in OLD v FTL, and you should be able to apply the march you are using to both.

If I'm wrong in this please let me know..?

Ego, thanks for uploading the software - it's very useful in testing.

In your results, after you obtain your +1, are you resetting & looking for a new STD3? Or is there some kind of continuous betting to take advantage of a medium/large swing of correction?

ego

Denial of gamblers fallacy is usually seen in people who has Roulette as last option for a way to wealth, debt covering and a independent lifestyle.  Next step is pretty ugly-
AP - It's not that it can't be done, but rather people don't really have a clue as to the level of fanaticism and outright obsession that it takes to be successful, let alone get to the level where you can take money out of the casinos on a regular basis. Out of 1,000 people that earnestly try, maybe only one will make it.

monaco

I've read & read & read this, & i got a light-bulb moment in understanding last night, though it's more of a dim glow in reality,

I think I've got an understanding of the basic singles contra series, the hovering, indications & tendencies, & even how they can be attacked,

but I'm trying to get to grips with the singles contra larger series idea, & have a question i hope you can help with..


Quote from: ego on Jul 18, 02:44 PM 2012
-

Illustration with real indications and tendency's and correction.

Singles contra larger series of singles.
Here can you see after 3.15 how larger series chop 3,4,5,6, and so on

Math value:

Singles has the value of 1
Series of two has the value of 0
Series of three has the value of 1
Series of four has the value of 2
Series of five has the value of 3
Series of six has the value of 4
And so on ...


say i have 17 singles (17), 2 series of 3(2) & 1 series of 4(2), which is 17/4 (STD 2.83), not quite STD3 but say it is ok for our purposes..

is the attack for a series of 2 to go to 3? If it doesn't go to 3, we have a series of 2(0), so we've lost a bet, but the score 17/4 hasnt changed.. I'm just not quite sure of the priniciple of attacking singles contra large series?

Also, in the example above, we would have 17/3 (STD 3.13) in singles contra series, so a joint attack could be made using both variations i suppose?



I would say that this method of play isn't quite as impractical as it may initially look.
If i am playing a shoe in baccarat, i would use this as a secondary selection (usually to recoup 1 or 2 units) once i reach about halfway through the shoe & i haven't reached my 2 units win-goal.

admittedly i don't always wait for the exact STD of 3, but if its getting that way as in the example above, I will look to play it if it's there.

ego


PM me

I am of to work now ...

Cheers
Denial of gamblers fallacy is usually seen in people who has Roulette as last option for a way to wealth, debt covering and a independent lifestyle.  Next step is pretty ugly-
AP - It's not that it can't be done, but rather people don't really have a clue as to the level of fanaticism and outright obsession that it takes to be successful, let alone get to the level where you can take money out of the casinos on a regular basis. Out of 1,000 people that earnestly try, maybe only one will make it.

Drazen

What do you think of idea to play Marigny like this:

As it actualy isnt important which EC we take or what odd actualy, but lets say we play with EC-s.

To maximize profits lets first play EC on straight. Half of the wheel. After +1 we can go lower to play with casinos money. So we go on splits. After that lower again on lines lets say. Then on dozens..

Something similar like 931 MM or 731..

Cheers

Drazen

monaco

Quote from: drazen_cro on Aug 24, 10:08 AM 2012
What do you think of idea to play Marigny like this:

As it actualy isnt important which EC we take or what odd actualy, but lets say we play with EC-s.

To maximize profits lets first play EC on straight. Half of the wheel. After +1 we can go lower to play with casinos money. So we go on splits. After that lower again on lines lets say. Then on dozens..

Something similar like 931 MM or 731..

Cheers

Drazen

I think I get the idea Drazen, but would be difficult to apply Marigny to splits/lines wouldn't it?

A lot of tracking involved?

Drazen

Well Monaco, with software of course. Not manualy.. :)

EC is EC. Marigny no cares how i get EC. lol

Actualy it doesnt has to be necessary EC. You can use any ratio, like 2:1 on dozens, but for that you have to adjust ratios, it wont be equal as on EC for example.

Cheers

Drazen

monaco

maybe i didn't get the idea after all  ;D

I thought you meant to play on splits/lines adjusting the ratios, not making new EC's out of them..

Beyond me I'm afraid, I'm paper & pens  :)

-