• Welcome to #1 Roulette Forum & Message Board | www.RouletteForum.cc.

News:

WARNING: Forums often contain bad advice & systems that aren't properly tested. Do NOT believe everything. Read these links: The Facts About What Works & Why | How To Proplerly Test Systems | The Top 5 Proven Systems | Best Honest Online Casinos

Main Menu
Popular pages:

Roulette System

The Roulette Systems That Really Work

Roulette Computers

Hidden Electronics That Predict Spins

Roulette Strategy

Why Roulette Betting Strategies Lose

Roulette System

The Honest Live Online Roulette Casinos

DNA OF ROULETTE SYSTEM: Your opinions, please

Started by esoito, Sep 11, 07:52 PM 2010

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

albalaha

Hey Guys,
          There are few good and bad news. Good news is Don Colonne has launched his new research and software and he has linked this topic in his site as discussion forum. So, we are official discussion forum for Don Colonnel's roulette research.
              Bad news is that the downloads are not working properly. If anybody could download it successfully, please provide the system book+ software in a zip or rar file and upload in this topic or in downloads section of this forum, so that it can be accessed freely by our community.

albalaha

I think Mr. Don A.R. Colonne should be cordially invited to this forum by Victor or Paul to opine on this.

malcop

Quote from: albalaha on Mar 23, 12:05 AM 2011
Hey Guys,
         There are few good and bad news. Good news is Don column has launched his new research and software and he has linked this topic in his site as discussion forum. So, we are official discussion forum for Don Colonnel's roulette research.
             Bad news is that the downloads are not working properly. If anybody could download it successfully, please provide the system book+ software in a zip or rar file and upload in this topic or in downloads section of this forum, so that it can be accessed freely by our community.

Hi All,

Sorry this is my fault I was aware of the problem contanting Dons site, and was hoping that it would have been resolved by now but it has not, this is what Don sent met.

-----------------------------

Dear Philip,

We have completed the work but we cannot upload as the hosting server in the US is disconnecting us owing either because of the entire bandwidth is occupied by the users or there is a denial of service attack on the specific applications. We are unable to either use the software or download or upload tbe books and the sofware, as of  6.00 pm today for the past seven hours. .

Let us update you with the finalized development. We removed the M1AP2A strategy after a rigorous testing and then we incorporated the conversion from the INV/P1AM2A to P1AM2A after a net spin loss of -4 on INV/P1AM2A.

The best approach would be to use only the P1AM2A upon getting activated with the GDI criteria.

Attached herewith is the latest RCLV book for your information and necessary action.

Best Regards

Don

-----------------------------------

Now the problem of access Don's site has baught up an potential issue that has been bothering me for some time, and I have voiced that to Don in an email, to sum up I think the software should be a stand alone application, we should have two choices:

1) use the software from the site.
2) use a stand alone version of the software.

I hope Don will provide use with a stand alone version so these sort of access issues to his site will not be an issue for us in the future.

Thanks

mlacop

malcop

Hi All,

I notice that Don's site is up and running again, but please do not use the software until I get the go ahead from Don that he has uploaded the latest version of System RCLV for your use.

Thanks

malcop

albalaha

The tool is working. I played my first session which reached stop loss. Not very impressive in first attempt.

albalaha

Second session recovered a bit of loss but not entirely. The best thing about this tool is its money management with an excellant exit. Let's see further. I will keep reporting.

albalaha

In third session,after playing 29 steps a loss of 6 units again and game stops. So far, so bad. I don't feel like playing it anymore.

malcop

Quote from: albalaha on Mar 23, 04:26 AM 2011
In third session,after playing 29 steps a loss of 6 units again and game stops. So far, so bad. I don't feel like playing it anymore.
No the tool is not working with the most up to date configuration, I did say do not use the tool until I have told you that Don has uploaded it, you are using the old version not the newer version.  Please read my next post!

malcop

Hi All,

I am still not advising that we use the tool till Don has uploaded the newer version.

Here are some recent emails between Don and myself.

-----------------------------------------------

Dear Philip,

We have completed the work but we cannot upload as the hosting server in the US is disconnecting us owing either because of the entire bandwidth is occupied by the users or there is a denial of service attack on the specific applications. We are unable to either use the software or download or upload tbe books and the sofware, as of  6.00 pm today for the past seven hours. .

Let us update you with the finalized development. We removed the M1AP2A strategy after a rigorous testing and then we incorporated the conversion from the INV/P1AM2A to P1AM2A after a net spin loss of -4 on INV/P1AM2A.

The best approach would be to use only the P1AM2A upon getting activated with the GDI criteria.

Attached herewith is the latest RCLV book for your information and necessary action.

Best Regards

Don


----------------------------------

My reply to the above email.

-----------------------------------------

Hi Don,

I have always thought this would happen at some point, I think the way forward it to make your software stand alone, that can't be that big a job for Dulan.

This is the only way forward, whoever has attacaked you knows your software only works from your website, so to stop them in their tracks all you need is a stand alone version, please make this your priority.

Thanks

Philip

-------------------------------------

Once again I will inform you all when Don has managed to upload the software until then DO NOT USE THE SOFTWARE!!!!!

Thanks

malcop

malcop

Hi All,

Latest update from Don.

-------------------------------

Dear Philip,

What Dulan did was now the software is loaded on his personal website and we provided a link. At present it works. My software in my system is seriously hacked and now we have to sit and correct the situation, as it does not allow us either to delete the corrupt system or to upload.

The RCLV system was improved in regard to ROI and the failure rate yesterday and it will be greatly appreciated if the members could test and post the observations. I saw 200 visitors today alone onto the discussion forum. If it works reasonably well, we will allow the system to be downloaded and used. I feel that RCVL is more effective than DNAR and also easy to use and monitor.

Please inform the forum that it is working but I do not know for how long. The comments posted previsously are based on the older version of the software and the new version with a conversion feature appears to be more effective.

Best Regards

Don

---------------------------------

As Don said in the above email he dose not know how long this will be up for so test this while you can, I would suggest that you need at least 30-50 sessions tested to see if this could be a long term winner.

Thanks

malcop


sekuritati

RCLV Version test

each session played up till the program stopped it(stop loss or stop win)


Session   1   -15   
Session   2   10   
Session   3   -8   
Session   4   -11   
Session   5   -9   
Session   6   12   
Session   7   12   
Session   8   -1   
Session   9   10   
Session   10   22   
Session   11   -4   
Session   12   -9   
Session   13   20   
Session   14   5   
Session   15   -13   
Session   16   -12   
Session   17   -9   
Session   18   6   
Session   19   -9   
Session   20   -2   
Session   21   -8   
Session   22   -5   
Session   23   13   
Session   24   -12   
Session   25   19   
Session   26   7   
Session   27   15   
Session   28   6   
Session   29   -6   
Session   30   15   
Session   31   -6   
Session   32   6   
Session   33   8   
Session   34   -3   
Session   35   7   
Session   36   16   
Session   37   -5   
Session   38   10   
Session   39   -14   
Session   40   -4   
Session   41   10   
Session   42   -8   
Session   43   21   
Session   44   -8   
Session   45   -8   
Session   46   -8   
Session   47   0   gave no bets up till spin 60???
Session   48   7   
Session   49   -9   
Session   50   -8   
-------------------------
End profit +43

interesting...

malcop

Hi All,

Latest update from Don.

----------------------------------

Dear Philip,

I am highly pleased with Sekuritati's posting that he tested 50 samples and ended up with a +43. In other words, if anyone played with 100$ chips, he would have earned 4300$! Being encouraged by that posting, what I will now do is that I will sit with Dulan when both of us are a little free (hopefully in the weekend) and reduce the CIH (which is currently set at 15) one chip at at time and see whether we can cut the losses early and enhance the bottom line profit. Data testing is not that difficult now, as the program and its practical usage is quite simple.

Once we optimize the CIH with our data samples and upload the system, we request Mr. Sekuritati to use the same 50 data samples and see whether it enhances the bottom line profit. If so, we will make a copy of the software available to be downloaded that the members could use it as an offline product, undisturbed.

I always believe that patience, perseverence, determination and endurance pays off only in the long run. Let us gettogether and turn the tables around!

Best Regards

Don

-----------------------------------

Thanks

malcop

sekuritati

Mr. Colonne,

I am glad I could help and have to say that indeed 15 chips session bankroll seems rather high, because some sessions start in absolute loss and in those sessions it would be better to cut losses while it is time and not waste 7 or 8 more chips. If I have to be honest there were 1 or 2 sessions where from -8 or -9 the session recovered with a profit but those were just 1 or 2 and the majority of losing sessions hit the session stop loss anyway.

If I had a say in this i'd say that 10 should suffice for those sessions that reach the session stop loss, because as it is obvious from the results some sessions were exited at -1 or -2 because the program said so as per the exit rules.

What also made an impression to me was that the winning sessions were crazy which was very refreshing to see because for example from session 19 to session 22 there were only losses then the next session made above 20 units in no time, although it dropped little by little to 17 then one total loss of 4 units and the program shut the session down as per the exit rules. That was nice to see.

albalaha

My message for Mr. Don Colonne
Dear Sir,
      I am very impressed with your researchwork and its generous free distribution. One thing that impresses me most is your flat betting (always with 4 chips) coupled with a sensible exit. But, I still doubt that it can win 20 out of 30 sessions (meaning thereby a net profit at last). I most humbly request you to join this forum and enlighten us all. I sincerely wish that your this great research will benefit the entire roulette system players community. I hope that you would be able to launch the final software soon.

malcop

Hi All,

I'm glad you are pleased with what Don has managed acheive so fare, and we all look forward how far he will be able to take this, but I want to clear something up, to me this is a flat bet and it is not, let me explain the way I see things.

You risk 4 chips at each round, the following could happen.

1) You win 8 chips.
2) You Win 6 chips
3) You Win 4 chips
4) You Win 2 chips
5) You Lose -1 chips
6) You Lose -4 chips

I think I got that right I'm sure someone will correct If I have got this wrong, just got in from a long day at work  ???

But either way each round we have 6 outcomes, 4 positive and 2 negative, and because of the various outcomes you can get from placing your four chips on the table, I don't think of this method as strictly a flat bet method.

Well that's what I think anyway, please feel free to comment, disagree ect.

Thanks

malcop

-