1 ON 1

[amk]

Hello again everybody,

I have developed a new method which shows great potential.... I have not come across this concept during the last 7 months of my research but ofcourse it might already exist..... As an avid player I feel I need to share my methods in order for it to advance to levels I by myself could not reach...

Together we stand strong....

                                                                   

1 ON 1

We have 9 different combinations of dozens and columns 2 wide....

1A
1B
1C
2A
2B
2C
3A
3B
3C

Total Units 8 or 80

We are ALWAYS betting in this sequence. Played HIT AND RUN we continue our next session where we left off in the sequence of 9.....

During 400 games played continuously there were 44 loses THIS IS NOT IMPORTANT what is IMPORTANT is that there were only 3 double loses......  +160 units played with 4 stage progression (80 units)

If this method was played ZEROBLUE style, wait for a loss then place your bets we would be up 16 units playing with 8 units (two stage progression) or up 40 units playing with 80 units (4 stage progression)

With many people hopefully testing this approach we can forge it into a winner...
 
Somewhere we will see a triple loss, it will be very rare, chances statistically are 1 in 729, HOWEVER we are playing 1 ON 1, our pattern versus randoms pattern. A triple loss and a double can only occur when the two patterns line up perfectly......difficult for random to do......

Look forward to your insights

[amk]

It would be worth while testing for H/L as well, 8 patterns.....

[iggiv]

bud, i am sorry to disappoint u but always the same sequence is not gonna work. that's just what
roulette kills. Roulette is an enemy of the same patterns. And random is not gonna work either. Though with random u will be closer to zero, and with the same sequence u will lose in a long run.

that's my 2 cents.

[superman]

same sequence is not gonna work

Agreed, it's been tried and tested on ALL combinations, exactly why the matrix methods fail too, they look at patterns and bet against them continuing, might as well just flip a coin, less tracking that way lol

[amk]

Hello Iggiv and Superman,

Thank you very much for your replies...

I just felt that the double loses are important, there were only 3 in 400 games...

If you were to wait for a loss then place a 4 step progression there would have been no loses...

Only testing can tell..... 

Only a triple loss is a complete loss, played HIT AND RUN the chances of hitting a triple loss are very small....

Just wanted to post this method to see where it can lead......