#1 Roulette Forum & Message Board | www.RouletteForum.cc

Roulette-focused => The Notepad => Topic started by: Wally Gator on Jul 30, 09:34 PM 2010

Title: Will it work long term?
Post by: Wally Gator on Jul 30, 09:34 PM 2010
Took this from the idea that winwithmath had regarding the sway of the pendulum.  Appears to have potential on an RNG with the double 0.  The more 0's the better.  Anyway, I've attached a spreadsheet.  It's easy to figure out and appears to work.  Need folks to put their numbers in and see if there is a streak that doesn't have a win.

Flat bet is the best part.

Any ideas or suggestions for making it better?

Gator
Title: Re: Will it work long term?
Post by: Boo_Ray on Jul 31, 04:31 PM 2010
I dont understeand what you mean
Title: Re: Will it work long term?
Post by: Wally Gator on Aug 01, 12:12 AM 2010
Thanks for your note.  I was trying to take advantage of the pendulum swing as winwithmath had shown using a strategy for the ECs.  Not sure if it's going to work, but seems like there is alot of room for using the swing back and forth to our advantage.

Basically a repeat is a + and a chop is a -.  I was playing this always looking to go down or toward even (0).

So, if you're at 3 you're looking to get to 2, then 1, then 0.  If you're at -3 you're looking to get to -2, then -1, then 0.

I don't see any incredibly long runs using this strategy and believe there are strong possibilities to take advantage of it, possibly with something like the 6-point divisor.

If you still dont' get it using the spreadsheet, please let me know and I'll further explain it.

Thanks for your help and question.
Title: Re: Will it work long term?
Post by: Phishalot on Aug 01, 07:40 AM 2010
Wally

I thought that using that method we where to stop when we reached either +4 or -8. I think if you play it long term you will need a large bankroll.

We know for a fact that the pendulum will always swing back to 0. But do not know how high it may swing to one side or the other. Think that is why this is a method is played with such a small win and loss goal.

Personally I think Jordan's method is better and is based on the same swing.

Nice to see ya
Phishalot
Title: Re: Will it work long term?
Post by: Wally Gator on Aug 01, 09:17 AM 2010
Phisalot,

Great to hear from you, thanks for the note.  I agree with what you're saying, which is why this is in the "notepad" section.  My thoughts were that if there are few runs with the strategy we could incoroprate a minimal progression that may make it a good less than 50-100 spin strategy.  Kind of like the win-maxx strategy on streets .... works most of the time, but if you lose you gotta have the guts to leave and not chase.

I missed Jordan's strategy, I'll look for it now.  Thanks.

Wally
Title: Re: Will it work long term?
Post by: Fripper on Aug 01, 09:40 AM 2010
Hi wally and you to have maybe found a way to play the swing James talked about in a different way, just as me. This idea is very similar as the one I posted in the full systems area and it is indeed interesting. Maybe we all can find the best way to take advantage of this swing. As one said, it always goes up and down, the hard thing is that it does sometimes go very high or low, and we don't know when. If we find some way to take advantage of both +1, -1,+1,-1 and so on and also +1,+1,+1,+1, then we are onto something.

Fripper
Title: Re: Will it work long term?
Post by: F_LAT_INO on Aug 18, 02:20 AM 2010
It is clearly explained in my thread--RAND.vers.RAND.--and in numb.6 testing of 30x100
sessions,each of 30 sessions were at least 20 units in plus in some stage.
It is a method for En Prison rules.And there is a clue you can build up your strategy on.
Title: Re: Will it work long term?
Post by: Wally Gator on Aug 18, 08:07 PM 2010
I can't play at a casino with En Prison rules.  Will it work without it?
Title: Re: Will it work long term?
Post by: F_LAT_INO on Aug 19, 04:41 AM 2010
Quote from: Wally Gator on Aug 18, 08:07 PM 2010
I can't play at a casino with En Prison rules.  Will it work without it?

Could on a stop w/l basis.