Helloooooo
To me it looks like a twilight zone occurrence, in 1024 spins there will be 456 singles on dozens (totaling 456 spins) and there will be 228 series totaling 568 spins.
How can series total more spins then singles???
It seems there is a force in roulette which pulls random to fall more on dozen series then singles but WHY the odds should be the same for both stats. As with ECs where the total singles spins equals the total series spins.
What am I not seeing correctly? why does random favor dozen series, maybe I am just missing something obvious.
Below are the stats from win-maxx perhaps this occurrence/pull can be used for an advantage some how?
Any thoughts?
In 1024 consecutive spins all three dozens together will form 684 figures:
456 single-units 456 figures 456 spins
and 228 series of which are:
series of 2 153 figures 306 spins
series of 3 51 figures 153 spins
series of 4 16 figures 64 spins
series of 5 6 figures 30 spins
series of 6 or higher 2 figures 15 spins
total 684 figures 1024 spins
Quote from: amk on Nov 11, 09:52 AM 2020
Helloooooo
To me it looks like a twilight zone occurrence, in 1024 spins there will be 456 singles on dozens (totaling 456 spins) and there will be 228 series totaling 568 spins.
How can series total more spins then singles???
It seems there is a force in roulette which pulls random to fall more on dozen series then singles but WHY the odds should be the same for both stats. As with ECs where the total singles spins equals the total series spins.
What am I not seeing correctly? why does random favor dozen series, maybe I am just missing something obvious.
Below are the stats from win-maxx perhaps this occurrence/pull can be used for an advantage some how?
Any thoughts?
In 1024 consecutive spins all three dozens together will form 684 figures:
456 single-units 456 figures 456 spins
and 228 series of which are:
series of 2 153 figures 306 spins
series of 3 51 figures 153 spins
series of 4 16 figures 64 spins
series of 5 6 figures 30 spins
series of 6 or higher 2 figures 15 spins
total 684 figures 1024 spins
e' evidente avrai un utile nelle serie di 6, quando avrai una serie di 6, esempio NNRNRN giocherai RRNRNR in quanto e praticamente improbabile che esca di nuovo lo stesso schema, in pratica giochi il contrario della serie, altro esempio, esce una serie di 6, RNRNRN tu giocherai NRNRNR in quanto la serie di sei e rara, e se incontri dopo la serie di 6 una serie di 2 3 4 5 la beccherai ugualmente :thumbsup:stesso discorso e valifdo per dozzine colonne bassi e alti
I think, we should ask, what the least amount of series, worst variance ever hit, in 100 spin increments. or what streak of dz must hit in 100spins, if streak of three must hit, then how you exploit it.
Thanks for your replies Ven and Sweet!
Will look into those angles.
Perhaps a better visual is this
The following represents proportionally 1024 spins (or even 1024000 spins)
568 series spins next to each other 222333311122222221133332211112211113322111333322211
456 singles spins next to each other 13231212323121321213232313231312312131213
as you can see there are 10% more series total spins then single spins
this will always be the case longterm
WHY?
why for example are the singles appearances not ahead by 10% why the series?
why are they not both the same?
they both deal with the same odds, if anything getting more series spins should be more difficult as landing the same dozen back to back to back etc the odds get more and more difficult...........
if series more than single, then try flatbet
1u,( only once,)
when a new dz hit, (follow new dz hit, only one bet, then stop, wait for new dz, ignore green),
hoping it will become series. Bet long term, say, 1000bet or. 10000bet. to see whether series more than single.
That wont work SWEET.
There is no known method that can win with these stats, the flat bet will fail.
What I am trying to find out is why are there more series spins then single spins?
The odds should be that series spins are less as it is more difficult to get back to back or more of the same dozen compared to single dozens.
I dont think anyone knows but there has to be a reason.
Flat bet after a new dozen Rx code and result.
[reveal]
system "Normy bet once after new Dozen system.dgt"
method "main"
begin
while starting a new session
begin
call "init"
end
copy record "last #" layout to record "2nd last #" layout
copy last number to record "last #" layout
if record "spins count" data > 1
begin
call "tracking"
end
add 1 to record "spins count" data
end
// -----------------------------------TRACKING -------------------------------
method "tracking"
begin
if Record "last #" layout is Found within Record "doz1" layout
and Record "2nd last #" layout is not Found within Record "doz1" layout
begin
Put 1 on 1st Dozen
end
// ===================================
if Record "last #" layout is Found within Record "doz2" layout
and Record "2nd last #" layout is not Found within Record "doz2" layout
begin
Put 1 on 2nd Dozen
end
// ===================================
if Record "last #" layout is Found within Record "doz3" layout
and Record "2nd last #" layout is not Found within Record "doz3" layout
begin
Put 1 on 3rd Dozen
end
end
// ------------------------------INITIALIZATION-------------------------------
method "init"
begin
copy list [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12] to record "doz1" layout;
copy list [13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24] to record "doz2" layout;
copy list [25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36] to record "doz3" layout;
clear record "last #" layout
clear record "2nd last #" layout
clear record "spins count" data
end
[/reveal]
link:s://:.rouletteforum.cc/index.php?topic=18814.0 similar idea