Zeroing In On EC Series

[atlantis]

Some time ago I posted:

In 64 spins the ideal expectation of the doublesides of all 3 EC's (6 EC's) forming a series of 2 ONLY is 24

In 64 spins the ideal expectation of the doublesides of all 3 EC's (6 EC's) forming a series of MORE THAN 2 is 24 too.

In 64 spins then the expectation for unique SINGLES that cannot form part of any of above EC series is therefore: 16.

So in 64 spins the expectation betting ONCE after series of 2 to form 3 - or betting ONCE on the OPPOSITE after a series of 2 is:

Win/Loss RATIO is: 24w / 40L

24 wins out of 64 spins expressed as a percentage = 37.5%

(For block of 128 spins - just double the w/l ratio eg: 48w / 80L; percentage is same for 128 spins = 37.5%)

I just ran 64 random numbers into RX and these are the stats for the 6 EC's:

=================================================

LOW - 4 hits of series of length exactly 2; 5 hits of series of length more than 2

HIGH - 3 hits of series of length exactly 2; 4 hits of series of length more than 2

TOTAL SERIES ON HIGH/LOW IN 64 spins = 16 (7 series of exactly 2; 9 series of more than 2)

16 hits total series for both sides of ONE EC is average %expectation of 16 hits

================================================
RED - 1 hit on series of length exxactly 2; 6 hits of series of length more than 2

BLACK - 5 hits on series of length exactly 2; 1 hit on series of length more than 2

TOTAL SERIES ON RED BLACK IN 64 spins = 13 (6 series of exactly 2; 7 series of more than 2)

13 hits total series for both sides of ONE EC is slightly under avg %expectation of 16 hits
================================================

ODD - 6 hits on series of 2; 2 hits on series of more than 2

EVEN - 5 hits on series of 2; 2 hits on series of more than 2

TOTAL SERIES ON ODD/EVEN IN 64 spins = 15 (11 series of  exactly 2; 4 series of more than 2)

15 hits total series for both sides of ONE EC is just under avg %expectation of 16 hits.
=================================================

If you bet AGAINST a series of 2 forming a series of 3 for ONE BET ONLY you get:

LOW/HIGH=7 hits
RED/BLACK=6 hits
ODD/EVEN=11 hits

Add 'em up and you get - surprise! 24 hits of series of 2 only in 64 spins!! (ideal/avg expectation)

That's 37.5%

These expectations are usually STABLE.

Now if betting ONCE only on series of 2 to become three you get:

LOW/HIGH =9 hits
RED/BLACK =7 hits
ODD/EVEN=4 hits

Add 'em up and you get 22 hits of series of 3 or more! (not quite ideal - but nothing perfect!)

That's 34.375%

Expectation is 24 hits on each series (series of 2 or 2+) in the frame span of 64 spins!

There will usually be about 16 unique singles in the 64 spins which cannot be made into a series of any of the EC's.
And usually about 48 total series.

24 (series of 2) + 24(series of more than 2) + 16(unique singles) = 64 spins

The following is the way I currently investigate to target, home in, pinpoint and "snipe" the repeat EC's. I use and would recommend a "mild progression".

There is avg. of 8 hits for EC repeats for each side of an EC over 64 spins.

I set RXtreme to only use stats for the last 64 spins only.

I track and input 64 spins. From now on I can always refer to the rolling history of the last 64 spins statistics and can see the total number of repeats for each side of the three EC's

I now consult the EC repeat stats in RXtreme which shows the singles and repeats for the last 64 spins.

I check these stats after EVERY SPIN has been inputted.

I look at the stats for R,B,O,E,H and L in turn after each decision.

As soon as I see an EC that has only 5 repeats or less in total I commence betting for a repeat of that EC. This can be immediately if a SINGLE of that type last hit or, if not, when that particular EC next hits. My aim is to capture a repeat EC.

This signal of 5 repeat series must include ALL series of 2 only PLUS series of 2+ added together...

For instance:

Stats for appearance of RED Series:

Series of 2 = 2
Series of 3 = 2
Series of 4 = 1
Series of 5 and above = 0

Total series of RED in 64 spins = 5 (signal)

I will now bet to follow RED forming a SERIES if the last result was a single red or when the next single red appears. If lose, I wait for next single red and bet for repeat etc... Stop at a winner!

Always I bet on the single to become a series. This applies to all 6 of the EC's being monitored.

Strategy is based on imbalance and return to mean.

This method requires patience and determination and resolve because you only bet when the stats show in your favour to an extent. (You can use a signal trigger of 4 if desired - but will get less betting opportunities)

I seek to find the optimum staking strategy and cut-loss points; this type of play will not suit everyone of course - but it does appear to be a sensible and stable selection criteria based on the general facts stated above and I class it as a meritable and purposive non-random approach capable of yielding a profit.


A.

[ego]

Antlantis, maybe you could try to win two in a row with Carch progression.
It has Three levels and you only lose it all if you strike 30 loses.

[atlantis]

Members may have perceived that by using these stats regarding the EC's that there are other signals that can be used to trigger bets  eg: attempting to capture the "single EC's" as well when it can be plainly seen that there exists a significant 'deficiency' building up which is assumed would soon be returning to balance...
Another idea can be to add up the "repeats" of BOTH sides of an EC and use a trigger to begin betting for EITHER side of that EC for the stats figures to return to norm when their appearance figures are below expected par too!

On the win-maxx site it says in relation to the "THE GENERAL LAW OF THE APPEARANCE OR DEVELOPING OF ALL THE EVENTS ATTRIBUTED TO CHANCE FOR EVEN MONEY BETS."

It is therefore allowed to say, that the independence of every spin is not a real one. Every spin of the wheel is a part and has a function in a permanency of a certain length!

If you now think this statement stands in contradiction with our introduction:
"roulette is a game of indepentdent trials, there is no secret connection between one spin an the next one", that is not so. In fact there is no secret, it is quite obvious that there must be a connection. Otherwise the wheel could not produce these steady statistics.

The question: "Are all spins and all appearances independent?" must be answered with : " No, neither the spins nor the appearances can be independent, because each is a part of the whole!" In reality, each spin and each appearance has its necessary and obligatory function in the totality of a permanency. Chance doesn't exist there, because all effects have their visible or hidden causes.

You can bet on that.

@ego: Thanks for your idea. Something like that is required, I think. Probably rule out the dangerous marty or fibo though. Gr8player, best of 3 or 5 maybe Oscar's or parlay bets...?

Despite all efforts there is still a chance of a horrible "variance" occurring so need to ensure measures in place to restrict losses and to cut down on the "gamble" element as much as poss. But nevertheless, it seems pertinent, moreover logical and reasonable to work with and utilise this general "law of appearance" to try and capitalise and swing the odds of success into our favour and gain the upper hand.

I will soon post an example.

A.

[ego]

I like this very much and will follow and read you topic again :-)

Cheers

[atlantis]

All sessions will be different and I warn there can be waiting periods where no bets are made.

Here is an example test session I just made.

Pics EC1 and EC2 show that there are 2 immediate qualifiers after 64 random spins generated thru RX simulator.
The two in question and which we are interested in are EVEN with 5 repeat series and LOW with 4 repeat series.
I attempt to capture a series on both.

Since the last number was a single instance of EVEN (#26) and it was HIGH number I shall bet only on the EVEN to produce a series of 2 first...
I thus bet 1u on EVEN and that is shown in pic EC3

The result (a win! #28 EVEN) is shown on spin 65 on pic EC4

On spin 67 a LOW number has now popped up and since there are 5 or less repeats on the stats counter I place a bet on the LOW which unfortunately loses on spin 68. There is then a run of another 7 high numbers before the next LOW single number outcome at Spin 76 (#7)
I now bet +1u on LOW for a repeat and on Spin 77 #10 occurs to deliver the win. Hooray!
This is all shown on pic EC5

Pic EC6 shows the balance graph. You can see there was then occurred a protracted period when there were no bets indicated before another phase of betting activity produced further profit later in the session.... This happens.

Pic EC7 shows a clip of the betting history from Spin 64 thru Spin 97 where I amass a total of +6pts.
(However I notice I make a slight mistake due to confusion and wrongly bet 2 EC's at one point)

The session ends with +10u.

I would play it Single 0 - Online live dealer or live autowheel online (preferably with le partage)
Very helpful if you can find a table where you have plenty of previous results history to assist in collecting the last 64 spins required quickly...

A.

[atlantis]

I win several sessions using this now.

Instead of just concentrating on the "series" or repeat EC's, I now attack both FOR the appearance of the singles and FOR the series across all EC's and I let the RX stats tell me when to bet as I showed. It's working like a charm.

This is because I am conforming and anticipating the wheel will act in accordance with the general law quoted above and ever seeks to balance out to the norm.  I bank on this happening and recurring into the expected normal avg. parameters due over the set of 64 spins duration - and I use a rolling history of the last 64 - so I'm always looking at the appearance stats for the last 64 after each and every spin...

To speed up the betting entry point until I have waited and gathered a full 64 decisions I have taken to now commencing staking after just 24 spins are recorded (with the same targets of "singles" and "series" appearance) but with a lower stats betting trigger of 0 or 1. If there are none indicated - I make no bet.

After 32 spins I will reset my trigger to: 2 or less

After 48 spins it will be: 3 or less

And after 64 spins and beyond - from now on I only will use EC appearances of 4 or 5 as before to qualify a bet situation for either "single" or "series".

I find it difficult to lose with this plan. I am playing cautiously; using a mild progression helps things along nicely.

Win a few units. Takes a bit of time but that's no sweat with me and I'm happy. I'm happy to stay with this for now and reluctant to even change my strategy or return to other methods as it has not yet let me down, and I feel I can play confidently assured of winning sessions ahead- also I do kinda feel I have the maths probability on my side...

@ego: Since you expressed interest I urge you to give it a try.

Anyhow, just letting you know this is my progress and changes up to now.

Regards,
A.

[PeaBea65]

Well done Atlantis, will follow this with interest.  Very interesting.

[atlantis]

After 64 spins, and if no bets are seemingly imminent or indicated I realise I can instantly reconfigure the spin stats in RXtreme back down to the last 24, 36 or 48 spin history and consult the EC appearance stats to check if any bets are are now indicated at those stages too - this is proving a tremendously useful and additional ploy to search for extra bet opportunities.   

Spins   Min
=======
24-35 -  0/1
36-47 -  1/2
48-63 -  2/3
64-    -  4/5


Results of Last 2 sessions:

S#1
===
Râ†'B@1=-1
Râ†'B@2=-2
Râ†'B@3=+3 
Râ†'B@1=+1  +1

Râ†'B@1=-1
Râ†'B@2=+2  +1

Râ†'B@1=-1
Râ†'B@2=+2  +1

Hâ†'H@1=+1  +1

Hâ†'H@1=+1  +1

Hâ†'H@1=-1 
Bâ†'B@1=+1 
Hâ†'H@1=+1  +1

Lâ†'H@1=+1  +1

Râ†'B@1=+1  +1


S#2
===
Bâ†'R@1=-1
Bâ†'R@2=+2   +1

Eâ†'E@1=+1   +1

Eâ†'E@1=+1   +1

Oâ†'E@1=+1   +1

Hâ†'L@1=+1   +1

Oâ†'E@1=+1   +1

Eâ†'O@1=-1
Eâ†'O@2=+2   +1

Oâ†'E@1=+1   +1

Râ†'B@1=+1   +1

Profit = +17u

A.

[mogul397]

What is RXtreme?  A phone app?

How do you get it?

Thanks

[Normy2000]

You find it here: link:://uxsoftware.com/pages/index.html
There is a free version but only 30$ to buy.