Optical Illusion

[ignatus]

15/21 Games won

I tested this +1/-1 progression,(and reset when reach a new high) and it seems to work very good! I imagine drawdowns be less with this kind of progression..(?)

Thanks Tomla! 

[ignatus]

17/26 Games won

No luck with this progression. i can't improve the stats sry 

[Tomla021]

Just something I like about the bet I will take a day off but I still like the bet or variations of it--- if it doesnt work c'est la vie

[Still]

14/20 Games won

5 sessions from hell, well, my luck turned, this wasn't the grail i was hoping for..  but still a ~70% winrate, i could live with that- if you consider losing ~2-3 times out of 10 sessions, still it's profitable

calculating wins/losses

losses 6*500= -3000u
wins 14*500= +7000u

Total= +4000u

Actually, given the way martingales tank, the losses are not stopped at exactly 500.  Actual tally might be breakeven. 

So yah, +1/-1 would be a better way to test.

[Tomla021]

did 10 more sessions won 8 to 500 lost 2 to -500

[ignatus]

OK, let's calculate on this one! 17/26 Games won= That's a ~65% winrate

So! Let's say we play with 1u bets, that would be;

Total investment 26*100= 2600u
Total losses 9*100= -900u
Total winnings 17*100= +1700u

Total= +800u

Total= 800/2600= That's a +31% Return of investment

NOT BAD!! 

[Tomla021]

this is a perfectly legitimate way of playing

[Tomla021]

played this flat betting and came out well ahead but I didnt track it--I will next time

[denzie]

OI, maybe one of my best martingale systems ever?...

[Tomla021]

the way its set up its an even money bet---he does the same on his new one---your forcing a situation but doing it slower ---I give ignatus kudos in a  big
way--im still studying

[Tomla021]

I play d'alembert but whatever as a martingale --plus 500 or minus 500---Its valid ! I have no probs losing 500 twice in 10 tries---its 5 marty shots interrupted by the break even bets--which stretch

[nottophammer]

tested two sets and both won the 500 with very little downdraft

roughly how many spins Tomla

[Tomla021]

about 65 ---and i didnt record it but it helped me understand it ---your pushing into what you want

[mogul397]

Just looking this over.  My thinking is that I need $5 for an outside bet even
though inside is 50 cents. So I could do this with $500. Not a crazy requirement.

Have done NO testing. But once again, what I see/feel is that some sort of stop loss
is needed. Either a stop "loss" or a stop "play". If you stopped playing during some
of those pronounced drawdowns, then maybe that would help.

Also, not for nothin', I've been looking/playing with EC's but playing the "event" that
just happened.  EG for "red-red" on the last 2, there is no change, so you bet red.
If it was red/black, it is a change, so bet red for another change.  This catches all
short or long runs of red of black and chops.  Doubles is the enemy. Just a thought.
Flat bet so far.