How to capitalize on this?

[GLC]

Red/Odd/Low in streets 1-3; 4-6; 7-9  (5 numbers)
Black/Even/Low in streets 1-3; 4-6; 7-9  (4 numbers)
Red/Even/Low in streets 10-12; 13-15; 16-18  (4 numbers)
Black/Odd/Low in streets 10-12; 13-15; 16-18  (4 numbers)
Red/Odd/High in streets  19-21; 22-24; 25-27  (5 numbers)
Black/Even/High in streets 19-21; 22-24; 25-27  (4 numbers)
Red/Even/High in streets 28-30; 31-33; 34-36  (4 numbers)
Black/Odd/High in streets 28-30; 31-33; 34-36  (4 numbers)

We can bet each of the above sortings with a unit on each of the even chance locations and also on each of the 3 streets.

Is there a way to use even chances to trigger bets on the streets or vice versa?

Can this arrangement be used like Flatino's system of betting most recent vs farthest back?

I've spent a lot of thought on this and I keep coming to a blank wall.

I've tried tracking the even chances to see what hits most as a trigger to bet the 3 streets.

Maybe we can bet 6 units, 1 unit on each of the corresponding 3 even chances and 1 unit on each of the streets?

Any way to exploit the fact that there are 5 Red/Odd/Low numbers in the 1st 3 streets and 5 Red/Odd/High numbers in the 19-27 streets?

Is this worth pursuing, or is it a waste of time?

Thoughts please.

GLC

[Ralph]

I have tested to use EC as trigger for straight up bets, and I think I  posted it here. I did not saw any special advantages that time, but it was a short test.

I checked the last 20 numbers and then play the minority i.e. if red,odd and low had lowest hit I bet the numbers which were red, low and odd.

Put a low stake and add up a chip each run until hit, if not on plus first hit, lower the stake and went on.

Suspect it would be better opposite, will give it a try for some spins.


The red odd balance I have though about, but could not see any advances.

Sometimes I place a  low doz, red and odd bet.

[Ralph]

Did a few sessions on using EC as trigger for straight up bets. Choosing the most shown in the last spins, The 20 on the marque.

This time it was very good, but I did not many. About 40 units a session in average. I will do some more, it may be the day's method!
I can not understand why I  trying sleeper methods before when I tested it, I use to not trust them wake up.

[Ralph]

I will give a thought on how to play streets using EC as trigger, I seems to need some experimental play, as this connection is not obvious.

[Ralph]

Playing try to use EC as trigger for streets. Did not got burned, but is was close.


trying this:

Use the second last number as trigger.

25 RED,ODD,HIGH

Use the streets with more than one RED, ODD, HIGH
Street 19-21,25-27

bet 1,   32 Loss
bet 2    26 Win +18

Tracking bets

one units 
2 black  loss -17

One tracking bet will do, its the second last next time.

bet on streets 4-6, 10-12.

This should have taken to much place.
Close to RFH.

86 bets and down (two streets)about 2300 units before it turned.
Thought it may become more frequent and start
adding 10 units a spin, remove some on each hit
Ended with 476 plus.

Not too bad, but it was a large drawback, I saw
the other two streets in this doz hitting very often.

Needs a better bet selection.

Do not feel for testing this more today.

[Drazen]

Dear George

RO vs BE is well known bet to all who have studied this game a bit better/longer.

Because there we have slight mathematical advantage. Still it doesn't prevent from large possible DD-s nor creates an edge...

I was writting some time ago how F_LAT_INO (when you already mentioned him here) played this bet for 7 days /sessions in a row, until he got balanced and back in plus.. although as outside bet

This your idea i find interesting and refreshing 




Cheers


Drazen

[GLC]

After starting this topic, I read through my archives and ran across the original?? system that introduced  me to this method of dividing the table.

In a nutshell this is the system.

Track for 30-40 spins (I hate this much tracking, probably why I didn't do anything with this the first time I ran across it) noting how many times each of the 6 even chances hits.  At the end of tracking, lets's say Red hit more than Black, Odd hit more than Even and Low hit more than High.

We start betting a four step marty on each of those 3 even chances simultaneously.  That's 1-2-4-8.  The author makes a statement that I'm not sure I understand.  He says:

"Each loss, even partial calls to use the next bet. This game proceeds until the purpose +70

units is reached, or the fourth bet has lost."The part that is confusing is when he says "even partial".  To me that means if we lose all 3 bets we move to the next higher bet.  If we lose 2 and win 1 we move to the next higher bet because our net is minus.  But if we lose 1 and win 2 that's a partial win and we reset all 3 back to 1. 


Continue playing this way until we reach +70 or lose while betting 8-8-8.If we lose while betting 8-8-8, we move to a 2nd half of the system which is betting the corresponding streets.

So with ROL we will be betting streets 1, 2 and 3 or numbers 1-9.

We use the following progression:1-1-1; 1-1-1; 2-2-2; 3-3-3; 6-6-6

If we ever lose the 6-6-6 bet, we continue to bet 6-6-6 (reminiscent of Hermes' leveller bet progression) until we reach our stop-loss (he recommends a 300 unit stop-loss) or our win target of +70.


+70 is not clear either because he says to play the marty until we reach +70 or lose while betting 8-8-8.  I take that to mean that if we reach +70 before losing 8-8-8 the game is over so if we lose 8-8-8 before reaching +70, when playing the streets, we should stop when we reach +70.  No?

One final point is that we play the same even chances or streets for the entire session.  That's the system as I understand it.

GLC