• Welcome to #1 Roulette Forum & Message Board | www.RouletteForum.cc.

News:

WARNING: Forums often contain bad advice & systems that aren't properly tested. Do NOT believe everything. Read these links: The Facts About What Works & Why | How To Proplerly Test Systems | The Top 5 Proven Systems | Best Honest Online Casinos

Main Menu
Popular pages:

Roulette System

The Roulette Systems That Really Work

Roulette Computers

Hidden Electronics That Predict Spins

Roulette Strategy

Why Roulette Betting Strategies Lose

Roulette System

The Honest Live Online Roulette Casinos

Found an old note of my play 40 years ago.

Started by Ralph, Aug 18, 09:11 AM 2012

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Ralph

I found in my papers a bet, I got from somewhere.
It is not anything I come up with  myself.

I have played this some years ago in Germany,
at the time we did not have any casinos here, and
online casinos or internet nobody knows of.

Its a funny bet, lose slow, and win very
often.

I have tested it today, trying to make some
progessing method to it.

Tested both negative and positive progressions.

Sometimes progressions on loss, give some winnings,
but often it is the same as go to the bank for
a loan, you must pay back later with interest.

I won on both progressions, but the negative
were more comfortable, as it advice then to stop
and do not ask for money not won in the same session.

The bet cover 20 numbers, one corner,one line
and 5 splits. The note I found I wrote it should
allways be the same bet, and numbers.

The bet gives allways at least 1 plus at any winning,
and up to 10 units.

I  tested progress one unit on winning, and just if the
winning comes from a split.

The sample is small, I do not yet know if it is
better flat or using a progression.

1 corner bet 0,1,2,3   1 unit
1 line        31-36   2 units
5 splits  8-11,13-14,15-18,17-20,27-30.  1  unit.


I do not remember why it should allways be the same numbers,
maybe just because I got winnings using them, it was
decades ago.
The best way to fail, is not to try!

TwoCatSam

If dogs don't go to heaven, when I die I want to go where dogs go.  ...Will Rogers

Ralph

Sam!

If you click on my name, the forum may gossip.
The best way to fail, is not to try!

TwoCatSam

If dogs don't go to heaven, when I die I want to go where dogs go.  ...Will Rogers

Normy2000

Quote from: Ralph on Aug 18, 09:11 AM 2012

1 corner bet 0,1,2,3   1 unit
1 line        31-36   2 units
5 splits  8-11,13-14,15-18,17-20,27-30.  1  unit.


Hi Ralph,

If you info about this bet selection, google: KAVOURAS BET

Cheers, nOrMy2o0o
nOrMy2o0o  ‹(•¿•)›
"Learn from yesterday, live for today, hope for tomorrow. The important thing is not to stop questioning."  Albert Einstein

Tamino

Ralph,


Whoever gave  you that  bet  did  you a favor. Given the chance I would play this in any  single 0 jurisdiction.

Similar to my 22 Action  number system  for the 0/00 wheel.

Tamino
APPY WINNINGS!!!

P.S. Did  you ever read about Christian Kaisan  at the Paroli forum?





Ralph

Quote from: Tamino on Aug 18, 10:58 AM 2012
Ralph,


Whoever gave  you that  bet  did  you a favor. Given the chance I would play this in any  single 0 jurisdiction.

Similar to my 22 Action  number system  for the 0/00 wheel.

Tamino
APPY WINNINGS!!!

Still I am not on other forum, Important information will often reach all forums.


I have checked the bet, and it is designed so it do not favour any sector on a physical wheel.
So you win due to pure luck, I used it once in Travemünde casino, betting flat, and got good result.
You will probably not win all the time, but I know it lose slow bad days.

I recall I got it from a guy from Bolivia in a casino in Germany, he bet very high stakes, and his mouth was full of gold. Myself betting 5 DM.

I may make some testing shifting the split according to hot numbers. May be have one moving.


P.S. Did  you ever read about Christian Kaisan  at the Paroli forum?
The best way to fail, is not to try!

F_LAT_INO



I have played this some years ago in Germany,
at the time we did not have any casinos here, and
online casinos or internet nobody knows of.

--Good old times,not even cameras.
  And those casinos that have worked
ilegally on border of Germany/Switz.
and on Boden Sea with 24 numbers
roulette...remember that Ralf.
You can always get me on  
ivica.boban@ri.t-com.hr

Ralph

Quote from: F_LAT_INO on Aug 18, 12:35 PM 2012

I have played this some years ago in Germany,
at the time we did not have any casinos here, and
online casinos or internet nobody knows of.

--Good old times,not even cameras.
  And those casinos that have worked
ilegally on border of Germany/Switz.
and on Boden Sea with 24 numbers
roulette...remember that Ralf.

From my part of the globe, North Germany, as Travemünde and Hamburg were the places we use to go, Just a few hours with the ferrys.

I was busy at work then, and could spend a few weekends a year.
The best way to fail, is not to try!

vladir

This is the kavouras bet. I played with it a bit some time ago, but never found a working progression for this... Any advice ?
"In God we trust; all others must bring data", W. Edwards Deming

Ralph

I am still testing, but it looks like rise one unit on win at a split, if other bets wins go back to one unit.

Played half we day, and never draw back more than all sessions got plus with a few units.

Test at BV in real mode, using 0.01 chips, got more than 200.
The best way to fail, is not to try!

ego


-

I remember a old member from the first vls forum many years ago - he use the name Lanky ...
He was expert playing 24 number bet using the 6 point divisor plan.

Not sure how he modify the 6 point divisor plan - but there is some old good topics around if you use google ...
Denial of gamblers fallacy is usually seen in people who has Roulette as last option for a way to wealth, debt covering and a independent lifestyle.  Next step is pretty ugly-
AP - It's not that it can't be done, but rather people don't really have a clue as to the level of fanaticism and outright obsession that it takes to be successful, let alone get to the level where you can take money out of the casinos on a regular basis. Out of 1,000 people that earnestly try, maybe only one will make it.

Ralph

Nothing is for sure. I tested progressions on win, and all ended  OK, had one deep hole, back so a bankroll of 100000 was on threat.
A few more losses in a row should have depleted 100000 units.

A few numbers not in play hitted extremely often  6 times 14, 3 times 6, 3 times 5, never saw
such outcome before. I may try to change the bet, so I can catch repeaters.

Ended with just 3 units plus.

I raised the stake  1 x 8 on win and stand on loss.
The best way to fail, is not to try!

ego


-

This make me think of Brett Morton 22 number bet selection - very similiar ... also John Patrick ...

John Patrick



Brett Morton



22 number bet:
1 unit on line 1 to 6
1 unit on line 10 to 15
1 unit on line 22 to 27
1 unit on corner 28 29 31 32
Denial of gamblers fallacy is usually seen in people who has Roulette as last option for a way to wealth, debt covering and a independent lifestyle.  Next step is pretty ugly-
AP - It's not that it can't be done, but rather people don't really have a clue as to the level of fanaticism and outright obsession that it takes to be successful, let alone get to the level where you can take money out of the casinos on a regular basis. Out of 1,000 people that earnestly try, maybe only one will make it.

Ralph

I have been tested all kinds of progressions, and I think you can not make it better using progressions.
The bet may not be better than any other. The reason you win for a while, has to do with the outcome.

Whitout progressions I may have lost as well, but at another time.

This is a permanent bet, and of course you will have a row of numbers which not includes the bet at any time.

I have spent 100 Euro testing. Was 30 plus at most.
The best way to fail, is not to try!

-