Dont know why its working, but it is at present!

[MuppetMan]

Hi all,
was just messing around and started placing 1 unit on 1st Doz, Red, 19-36, and 1st 2 columns. 5 units total.
Made a quick 50 units.
If you dont increase running total you increase each bet by a unit. Even if you stay even you increase bet size until you increase your overall profit. But if you have a win, you decrease by 1 until increase profit. Hope that makes sense.
Could be nonsense. Will test more tomorrow as 130am here in Perth.

MM

[wento]

Haha at aswell, get an idea in my head and can't sleep and stay up late texting it and playing around

[MuppetMan]

ha yep nonsense

[GLC]

ha yep nonsense

Just a mini-snapshot of a lot of the systems I've posted.  They were fun while they were winning, but it didn't take long to find out the were "nonsense".

On the other hand, there's no reason why by setting some boundaries you couldn't win a few chips betting that way.  Maybe use a trigger to start betting, set a reasonable stop loss, win target, etc...   Who knows??

Why not look at my topic "DUE" for some ideas.  Maybe track until some of the bet locations get way behind and then start flat betting.  #15 and zero are the only 2 numbers that cause you to lose all 5 chips.  A short session is the key here, I think.

You could move the bet on 19-36 to the 3rd dozen.  That would mean the 15, 24 and zero are the only total losers.

I've played around with these static bets a lot.  The longer you play them, the worse it gets.  You always run into a rash of 15's and zero's.

You can use the hollandish  idea for a progression.

Try this.  Every time you lose anything break it into 1 unit pieces and write the 1's down in a recovery line.  Keep writing them down or crossing them off until you reach a win target of +20 or you have a total loss of 5 units in one spin.  At that time increase your bets on all 5 locations by 1 unit.  Now you're betting 2 units on each.  Every time you win something cross off the 1's.  Every time you lose something write down that many 2's to the right of the 1's.  Even if you lose all 5 bets, keep writing down the amount in 2's until you have recovered all the 1's.

After all the 1's are recovered, move to betting 3 units on all 5 locations and start crossing off the 2's.  Continue in this fashion until you have recovered everything and then drop back to betting 1 unit on each location.

Set a reasonable stop loss of say 50-75 units and see how it performs.  I've had bets like this do very well.  When it starts going south, just don't give everything you won back and chalk it up to experience.

GLC

[Master_of_pockets]

That s ok MuppetMan.
It s good to have you here and posting ur ideas and systems...this is why  R forums exists.

If you like take my little advice.
It s good for you to test a system for a good amount of spins in order for you to see if it s a good system that may have potentials or not.
Good fluctiations happens all the time and can trick us in a little spin sample.

After 1000flat betting spins or after 10.000 betting spins with progression its a nice amount to post a system and it s a system that is worth looking at.

[Nickmsi]

Don't Give Up . . .

Just add a little differential betting, different progression and Bingo, you might have a winner.

Check it out.  Attached RNG and Manual versions of the Muppet-Man.

Simply press F9 on the RNG version and see immediately what your maximum draw down was, what your maximum bets were for Red, High, Column 1 & 2 and Dozen 1.

Play with .01 and you can have some fun.  Enter all 1's in the Column AP "EC Bet Amounts" if you want to try Flat Betting.

Thanks for posting.  Enjoy.

Nick

[MuppetMan]

Wow,
Thanks guys for contributing. I was simply mucking around with this last night before bed as I tend have add when comes to roulette. Hmm, what about this, or this, what if i did this, and before i know it I have totally lost direction of my initial concept.

Trust me I wont ever give up.

And George, I have looked at 'Due'. Going to have a play around with it. Its hard to focus in this forum I find. haha.

[GLC]

Wow,
Thanks guys for contributing. I was simply mucking around with this last night before bed as I tend have add when comes to roulette. Hmm, what about this, or this, what if i did this, and before i know it I have totally lost direction of my initial concept.

Trust me I won't ever give up.

And George, I have looked at 'Due'. Going to have a play around with it. Its hard to focus in this forum I find. haha.

This forum is a veritable playground for someone with Attention Deficit Disorder.  Even if you don't have ADD you'll think you do after a few weeks.